Skip to content

Application of Economics & Social Psychology to Improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1: EHR Nudges

Application of Economics & Social Psychology to Improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1: Electronic Health Record Nudges

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04477304
Acronym
AESOPS-T1
Enrollment
555
Registered
2020-07-20
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2023-08-06
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Abuse, Unspecified

Keywords

opioid use disorder, randomized control trial, behavioral economics, nudges

Brief summary

The opioid epidemic has had a tremendous negative impact on the health of persons in the U.S. The objective of the trial 1 of Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS-T1), is to discourage unnecessary opioid prescribing through the application of behavioral insights-empirically-tested social and psychological interventions that affect choice.

Detailed description

A multisite study, AESOPS-T1 randomizes clinics to behavioral intervention or control. Clinics randomized to the behavioral intervention arm receive electronic health record (EHR)-based nudges. Eligible participants are clinicians who practice ambulatory primary care at the participating clinical sites in Illinois and California. At the time of opioid prescribing, clinicians in clinics randomized to the intervention group will be prompted with an EHR nudge when the prescribing history for the patient falls into one of the following three mutually exclusive categories: Opioid naïve, At-risk for long-term use, or Long-term opioid recipient. These EHR-based nudges include accountable justification, defaults and precommitments. The control arm receives no EHR-based intervention. Both arms receive guideline education. The primary outcome is the change in clinician aggregate weekly milligram morphine equivalent (MME) dose and the secondary outcome is the proportion of dosages that equal or exceed 50 MME per day. These outcomes will be estimated by treatment arm with an intent-to-treat difference-in-differences framework using a mixed-effects regression model on clinician MME daily dose. The intervention period will be 18-months, with a 6-month follow-up period to measure the persistence of effects after the interventions conclude.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOpioid Naive, OR

Visits where the order is for an included opioid and there is no prior opioid prescription with a start date of greater than 1 day and less than 91 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

BEHAVIORALAt-risk for long-term use, OR

Visit where the order is for an included opioid, there is a prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 1 day and less than 91 days, and there is no prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 90 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

Total opioid doses are at least 50 MME per day, there are two or more prior opioid prescriptions with two different start dates both greater than 1 day and less than 91 days, and there is a prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 90 days and less than 181 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

Sponsors

Northwestern University
CollaboratorOTHER
AltaMed Health Services Corporation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Providers of clinics that see patients ≥ 18 years old and for whom clinic leadership agrees to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* Visits will be excluded from intervention when the patient has active cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)6-month baseline and 18-month interventionChange = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)6-month baseline and 18-month interventionChange = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention6-month baseline and 18-month interventionChange = (18-month intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)6-month baseline and 6-month post-interventionChange = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 18-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention6-month baseline and 6-month post-interventionChange = (6-month post-intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)6-month baseline and 6-month post-interventionChange = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Behavioral Intervention Arm
Clinicians in clinics randomized to the intervention group receive guideline education and will be prompted with an EHR nudge when the prescribing history for the patient falls into one of the following three categories: Opioid naïve, At-risk for long-term use, or Long-term opioid recipient.
322
Control
Clinicians in clinics randomized to the control group will receive web-based guideline education, consisting of an online educational module at the start of the study period. This will include educational clinical content related to the CDC guidelines, the Oregon Pain Guidance document, tapering training and other resources such as Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Medication-Assisted Treatment Physician Locator and the Naloxone Provider Guide.
233
Total555

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyNo valid opioid prescriptions during study timeframe4726

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalBehavioral Intervention Arm
Age, Customized
Unknown/Not reported
233 years555 years322 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
233 Participants555 Participants322 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
135 Participants334 Participants199 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
92 Participants213 Participants121 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown/Not reported
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3220 / 233
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3220 / 233
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3220 / 233

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx =\> 50 MME during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.21 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.02
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.02 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.23, -0.16]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx \< 50 MME during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.14 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.05 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.12, -0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention

Change = (18-month intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention-0.08 Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsStandard Deviation 0.01
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention0 Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsStandard Deviation 0.01
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.1, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx =\> 50 MME during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.13 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.04 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.02
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.13, -0.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 18-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.09 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.04 chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEStandard Deviation 0.01
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.08, -0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention

Change = (6-month post-intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

Population: Clinicians enrolled at AltaMed and Northwestern University who prescribed an opioid Rx during study period. Historical Rxs, suppositories/injectionables, control clinicians who erroneously received alerts, and Rxs prescribed to patients diagnosed with cancer, or who were under 18 years, were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Intervention ArmChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention-0.02 Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsStandard Deviation 0.01
ControlChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention-0.01 Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsStandard Deviation 0.01
Comparison: Assuming a clinic-level intraclass correlation of 0.01, alpha 0.025, 86 clinics, and 5.5 clinicians per-clinic (N = 473), it was calculated we would have over 85% power for a one-tailed test detecting a 12% reduction in MME from baseline to intervention.p-value: 0.39295% CI: [-0.03, -0.01]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026