Skip to content

Examining the Impact of Mindfulness on Patients' Experience of Osteopathic Manipulation

Examining the Impact of Mindfulness on Patients' Experience of Osteopathic Manipulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04477278
Enrollment
39
Registered
2020-07-20
Start date
2019-03-25
Completion date
2020-06-23
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Satisfaction, Patient

Brief summary

This is a single site, two-arm, parallel group pilot randomized controlled trial examining the effect of coupling a brief mindfulness-based intervention with an osteopathic manipulation session for pain patients.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindfulness Meditation

The mindfulness meditation recording consisted of instruction in focused attention on breath and body sensations and metacognitive monitoring and acceptance of discursive thoughts, negative emotions, and pain.

BEHAVIORALHistory of Osteopathy

The history of osteopathy recording introduced patients to the founder of osteopathy, Andrew Taylor Still, and his philosophy of healing.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for OMT at the Huntsman Cancer Institute

Exclusion criteria

* Altered mental status due to delirium, psychosis, or medication sedation as determined by treating clinician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity from immediately before session to immediately afterImmediately before and after the osteopathic manipulation session (i.e., 1 hour)Pain intensity was measured with individual items rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate more pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Sensation Ratio (Pleasant/Unpleasant) from immediately before session to immediately afterImmediately before and after the osteopathic manipulation session (i.e., 1 hour)The sensation manikin is a digital human figure silhouette that is overlaid with a grid of 786 sensation pixels. Participants identify locations (i.e., grid pixels) on the manikin where they feel both pleasant and unpleasant sensations. Clicking once on any grid pixel turns that location blue, indicating a pleasant sensation. Clicking twice on any grid pixel turns that location red, indicating an unpleasant sensation. Each participant was instructed to color the entire area in which they were currently feeling sensation in their body. A clinically useful sensation ratio score is achieved by dividing the number of pleasant sensation pixels reported by the number of unpleasant sensation pixels reported. Higher scores indicate a larger pleasant sensation to unpleasant sensation ratio.
Patient SatisfactionImmediately after the osteopathic manipulation sessionSession satisfaction was measured with an individual item (I am satisfied with my treatment session.) rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Change in Mindfulness of the Body from immediately before pre-session audio recording to immediately afterImmediately before and after the pre-session audio recording (i.e., 10 minutes)Mindfulness of the body was measured with an individual item (I felt in contact with my body) from the State Mindfulness Scale (Tanay & Bernstein, 2013) rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate more mindfulness of the body.
Change in Embodied Safety from immediately before pre-session audio recording to immediately afterImmediately before and after the pre-session audio recording (i.e., 10 minutes)Embodied safety was measured with an individual item (I felt my body was a safe place.), from the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (Mehling et al., 2012) rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater embodied safety.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026