Skin Laxity
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bipolar fractional radiofrequency treatment via use of the Profound System to achieve skin tightening and contour change in lax submental (beneath the chin) tissue.
Detailed description
This is a single-center, unblinded, non-randomized, non-controlled study designed to follow a total of up to 15 qualified and consenting subjects to receive one bipolar fractional radiofrequency microneedling treatment under an IRB approved protocol. Up to 15 subjects will be enrolled and treated at UT Southwestern in the Department of Plastic Surgery. Subjects will be identified from the clinical practice of Dr. Jeffrey Kenkel, Department of Plastic Surgery.
Interventions
Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Healthy male and female adults between ages 21-70 years of age. * Desire skin laxity lift of the submental region. * Confirmed BMI ≤ 35. * Subjects who can read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent Form. * Subjects willing and able to comply with all study requirements. * Fitzpatrick skin type I-VI. * Submental fat graded by the Investigator as ≥ 1 using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale * Subject is willing not to undergo any type of aesthetic procedure that could confound the study device treatment effects until he/she completes the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Active localized or systemic infections, that may alter wound healing. * Immunocompromised subjects. * Subjects with coagulation disorder. * History of skin photosensitivity disorders, or use of photosensitizing drugs (e.g., tetracycline or sulfa drugs). * Pregnant and/or lactating (All female volunteers will be advised about using birth control during the period of study). * Excessive skin laxity on the submental and neck (Submental Skin Laxity Grade: SMSLG 4, Appendix E), or other anatomical feature for which reduction in SMF which may, in the judgment of the investigator, result in an aesthetically unacceptable outcome. * Scarring in areas to be treated. * Tattoos in the treatment areas to be treated. * Significant open facial wounds or lesions. * Severe or cystic acne in treatment areas. * Current active smoker. * Use of Accutane (Isotretinoin) within the past 6 months. * Use of topical retinoids within 48 hours. * Use of prescription anticoagulants. * Pacemaker or internal defibrillator. * History of skin disorders resulting in abnormal wound healing (i.e. keloids, extreme dry and fragile skin). * Subjects on current oral corticosteroid therapy or within the past 6 months * Metal implants in the treatment area. * In the opinion of the investigator, subject is unwilling or unable to adhere to all study requirements, including application and follow-up visits. * Subjects with a history of radiation therapy to the treatment area. * Subject has a history of allergy to lidocaine or ester-based local anesthetics. * Subjects with significant cardiac history or rhythm disturbance who may be unable to tolerate lidocaine with epinephrine. * Subjects with any skin pathology or condition in the treatment area that could interfere with evaluation or with the use of typical ancillary medical treatments or care used before, during or after treatments (e.g. psoriasis, rosacea, eczema, seborrheic dermatitis, vitiligo, hyper or hypo-skin pigmentation conditions such as post inflammatory hyperpigmentation). * Subjects who are unwilling to shave excessive hair in the treatment area that might influence or impair evaluation in the opinion of the Investigator. * Subjects have undergone skin resurfacing or tightening treatments in the treatment area over the past year. * Subjects have undergone dermatological treatments such as fillers and neurotoxins for the past 6 months in the treatment area. * Subjects have undergone laser and light treatments in the treatment area over the past 3 months. * Subjects have undergone superficial peel or microdermabrasion within 4 weeks.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Minor Tissue Strain | Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up | Percent change in Minor Tissue Strain is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6. |
| Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area | Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up | 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Volume | Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up | 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6. |
| Percent Change in Horizontal Displacement | Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up | Percent change in Horizontal Displacement is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6. |
| Percent Change in Vertical Displacement | Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up | Percent change in Vertical Displacement is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Skin laxity and elasticity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin laxity, elasticity. |
| Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Skin Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation. |
| Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Stiffness) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Skin stiffness will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin stiffness. |
| Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Energy Absorption) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Energy absorption will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin - Energy absorption |
| Improvement in Assessments: Global Aesthetic Improvement Score | Baseline - 6 Months (Day 180) | Blinded reviewers will assessment and score using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (1=Very Much Improved, 5= worse) |
| Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | Baseline, Month 6 | Biopsies collected from subjects will be analyzed to observe changes from baseline to Month 6 . Gene Expression studies cellular activity and Col1, Col3, ELN, Lox, IL8 are all biomarkers. Fold Changes were compared to control and calculated from Ct values of RT-qPCR reactions. * Ct: threshold cycle * RT-qPCR: Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) |
| Change in Histology at Month 3 | Baseline, Month 3 | All subjects will undergo a single treatment for skin laxity in the submentum with a dermal handpiece. Dermal Handpiece: Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity. Fold changes were compared to control and were calculated from fluorescence intensity of a confocal microscopy images. Histology studies the structure of the tissue. Col3, Col1, ELN, Macrophage are biomarkers. |
| Change in Histology at Month 6 | Baseline, Month 6 | All subjects will undergo a single treatment for skin laxity in the submentum with a dermal handpiece. Dermal Handpiece: Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity. Histology studies the structure of the tissue. Col3, Col1, ELN, Macrophage are biomarkers. |
| Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | Baseline, Month 3 | Biopsies collected from subjects will be analyzed to observe changes from baseline to Month 3. Gene Expression studies cellular activity and Col1, Col3, ELN, Lox, IL8 are all biomarkers. Fold Changes were compared to control and calculated from Ct values of RT-qPCR reactions. * Ct: threshold cycle * RT-qPCR: Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) |
| Subjects Assessment of Pain: Numerical Pain Rating Scale | Visit 2 (Day 0- immediately after study procedure) | Immediately after the study procedure, subjects will be asked to rate any pain or discomfort using a 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0= No pain, 10= Extreme pain) |
| Non-invasive Measurements: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurements | Baseline, 3 Month and 6 Month Follow Up | Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Biox Aquaflux- will be used to measure transepidermal water loss. |
| Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Baseline, 3 months, 6 Months (Day 180) | Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Skin laxity and elasticity are measured using the Biomechanical Tissue Characterization System. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to topographical and histological images of pre- and post-treated skin. Ra, is the average measurement of skin curvatures and takes into all account variances in the skin roughness profile from the center line. Rz, is the difference between the highest and lowest data points from the mean surface measurement. |
| Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Attenuation Coefficient | Baseline, 3 months, 6 Months (Day 180) | Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to topographical and histological images of pre- and post-treated skin. Attenuation coefficient (AC) is a measure of the decay of light intensity within the sample due to absorption and scattering. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Single Group All subjects will undergo a single treatment for skin laxity in the submentum with a dermal handpiece.
Dermal Handpiece: Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity. | 15 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Single Group |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Score Skin Type 1 | 2 Participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Score Skin Type 2 | 8 Participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Score Skin Type 3 | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 13 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 13 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 13 |
Outcome results
Percent Change From Baseline in Volume
3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up
Population: 2 subjects withdrew from the study thus only 13 were analyzed at Month 6.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Percent Change From Baseline in Volume | -1.30 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Percent Change From Baseline in Volume | -1.9 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area
3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up
Population: 2 subjects withdrew from the study thus only 13 were analyzed at Month 6.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area | -0.18 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area | -017 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
Percent Change in Horizontal Displacement
Percent change in Horizontal Displacement is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up
Population: 2 subjects withdrew from the study thus only 13 were analyzed at Month 6.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Percent Change in Horizontal Displacement | -0.55 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Percent Change in Horizontal Displacement | -0.44 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Percent Change in Minor Tissue Strain
Percent change in Minor Tissue Strain is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up
Population: 2 subjects withdrew from the study thus only 13 were analyzed at Month 6.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Percent Change in Minor Tissue Strain | -5.0 percentage change | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Percent Change in Minor Tissue Strain | -0.44 percentage change | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Percent Change in Vertical Displacement
Percent change in Vertical Displacement is measured using the Markerless Tracking feature on Canfield's H2 3D Imaging System. 3D stereophotogrammetry measurements obtained at Follow Up visits and compared to baseline measurements. Percent change from baseline was calculated from baseline for both Month 3 and Month 6.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6 Follow Up
Population: 2 subjects withdrew from the study thus only 13 were analyzed at Month 6.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Percent Change in Vertical Displacement | 0.04 percent change | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Percent Change in Vertical Displacement | -0.19 percent change | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
Change in Gene Expression at Month 3
Biopsies collected from subjects will be analyzed to observe changes from baseline to Month 3. Gene Expression studies cellular activity and Col1, Col3, ELN, Lox, IL8 are all biomarkers. Fold Changes were compared to control and calculated from Ct values of RT-qPCR reactions. * Ct: threshold cycle * RT-qPCR: Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
Population: Inconsistency in the analyzed patients was due to study staff unable to obtain a usable sample during visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | ELN | 1.27 fold change | Standard Error 0.4 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | Lox | 1.81 fold change | Standard Error 0.39 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | Col1 | 1.18 fold change | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | Col3 | 1.46 fold change | Standard Error 0.42 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 3 | IL8 | 1.81 fold change | Standard Error 5.46 |
Change in Gene Expression at Month 6
Biopsies collected from subjects will be analyzed to observe changes from baseline to Month 6 . Gene Expression studies cellular activity and Col1, Col3, ELN, Lox, IL8 are all biomarkers. Fold Changes were compared to control and calculated from Ct values of RT-qPCR reactions. * Ct: threshold cycle * RT-qPCR: Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Population: Inconsistency in the analyzed patients was due to study staff unable to obtain a usable sample during visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | Col1 | 6.28 fold change | Standard Error 5.56 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | Col3 | 9.99 fold change | Standard Error 5.56 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | ELN | 2.62 fold change | Standard Error 0.79 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | Lox | 9.24 fold change | Standard Error 8.56 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Gene Expression at Month 6 | IL8 | 9.24 fold change | Standard Error 8.56 |
Change in Histology at Month 3
All subjects will undergo a single treatment for skin laxity in the submentum with a dermal handpiece. Dermal Handpiece: Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity. Fold changes were compared to control and were calculated from fluorescence intensity of a confocal microscopy images. Histology studies the structure of the tissue. Col3, Col1, ELN, Macrophage are biomarkers.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
Population: Inconsistency in the analyzed patients was due to study staff unable to obtain a usable sample during visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 3 | Col3 | 1.24 fold change | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 3 | Col1 | 0.98 fold change | Standard Error 5.77 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 3 | ELN | 1.21 fold change | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 3 | Macrophage | 0.92 fold change | Standard Error 4.38 |
Change in Histology at Month 6
All subjects will undergo a single treatment for skin laxity in the submentum with a dermal handpiece. Dermal Handpiece: Radiofrequency (RF) will travel through the RF generator through the electrodes and into the dermal layer beneath the surface of the skin. The microneedles of the dermal cartridges coupled with the thermal heat will stimulate neocollagenesis and neoelastosis, aiding in the reduction of submental laxity. Histology studies the structure of the tissue. Col3, Col1, ELN, Macrophage are biomarkers.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Population: Inconsistency in the analyzed patients was due to study staff unable to obtain a usable sample during visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 6 | Col3 | 1.04 fold change | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 6 | Col1 | 0.93 fold change | Standard Error 5.04 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 6 | ELN | 0.98 fold change | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Change in Histology at Month 6 | Macrophage | 0.89 fold change | Standard Error 5.55 |
Improvement in Assessments: Global Aesthetic Improvement Score
Blinded reviewers will assessment and score using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (1=Very Much Improved, 5= worse)
Time frame: Baseline - 6 Months (Day 180)
Population: Only 11 out of 15 enrolled were analyzed since 2 subjects withdrew and the photos of 2 other subjects were not clear.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Improvement in Assessments: Global Aesthetic Improvement Score | 2.727 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation)
Skin Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Viscoelastic Deformation | 0.098 mm | Standard Deviation 0.044 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Elastic Deformation | 3.317 mm | Standard Deviation 4.227 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Ultimate Deformation | 2.316 mm | Standard Deviation 0.819 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Viscoelastic Deformation | 0.091 mm | Standard Deviation 0.047 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Elastic Deformation | 1.947 mm | Standard Deviation 0.591 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Ultimate Deformation | 2.038 mm | Standard Deviation 0.621 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Elastic Deformation | 1.718 mm | Standard Deviation 0.662 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Ultimate Deformation | 1.805 mm | Standard Deviation 0.686 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Elastic, Viscoelastic and Ultimate Deformation) | Viscoelastic Deformation | 0.087 mm | Standard Deviation 0.043 |
Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Energy Absorption)
Energy absorption will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin - Energy absorption
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Energy Absorption) | 78.583 mmHg*mm | Standard Deviation 19.482 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Energy Absorption) | 74.724 mmHg*mm | Standard Deviation 21.76 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Energy Absorption) | 76.425 mmHg*mm | Standard Deviation 29.84 |
Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity)
Skin laxity and elasticity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin laxity, elasticity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Laxity | 1.772 mm | Standard Deviation 0.751 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Elasticity | 0.997 mm | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Laxity | 1.397 mm | Standard Deviation 0.624 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Elasticity | 1.053 mm | Standard Deviation 0.356 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Laxity | 1.197 mm | Standard Deviation 0.547 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Laxity, Elasticity) | Elasticity | 0.808 mm | Standard Deviation 0.387 |
Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Stiffness)
Skin stiffness will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Bio-Mechanical Tissue Characterization (BTC2000)- will be used to measure skin laxity values of the skin. This is a laser measurement system for objective, quantitative and sensitive analyses of the bio-mechanical properties of: Skin stiffness.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Stiffness) | 205.129 mmHg/mm | Standard Deviation 50.702 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Stiffness) | 208.689 mmHg/mm | Standard Deviation 46.586 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements : Biomechanical Tissue Measurements (Stiffness) | 210.836 mmHg/mm | Standard Deviation 74.519 |
Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Attenuation Coefficient
Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to topographical and histological images of pre- and post-treated skin. Attenuation coefficient (AC) is a measure of the decay of light intensity within the sample due to absorption and scattering.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 Months (Day 180)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Attenuation Coefficient | 4.145 mm-1 | Standard Deviation 0.765 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Attenuation Coefficient | 3.748 mm-1 | Standard Deviation 0.674 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Attenuation Coefficient | 3.661 mm-1 | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz]
Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Skin laxity and elasticity are measured using the Biomechanical Tissue Characterization System. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to topographical and histological images of pre- and post-treated skin. Ra, is the average measurement of skin curvatures and takes into all account variances in the skin roughness profile from the center line. Rz, is the difference between the highest and lowest data points from the mean surface measurement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 Months (Day 180)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Ra (arithmetic mean roughness) | 0.015 mm | Standard Deviation 0.004 |
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Rz (Average depth of roughness) | 0.105 mm | Standard Deviation 0.027 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Ra (arithmetic mean roughness) | 0.014 mm | Standard Deviation 0.004 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Rz (Average depth of roughness) | 0.1 mm | Standard Deviation 0.028 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Ra (arithmetic mean roughness) | 0.014 mm | Standard Deviation 0.005 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) : [Ra, Rz] | Rz (Average depth of roughness) | 0.095 mm | Standard Deviation 0.028 |
Non-invasive Measurements: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurements
Skin texture and laxity will be assessed using non invasive skin measurements. Biox Aquaflux- will be used to measure transepidermal water loss.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Month and 6 Month Follow Up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurements | 14.084 g/m^2/h | Standard Deviation 3.821 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurements | 11.095 g/m^2/h | Standard Deviation 4.539 |
| 6 Month Follow Up | Non-invasive Measurements: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurements | 14.246 g/m^2/h | Standard Deviation 6.661 |
Subjects Assessment of Pain: Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Immediately after the study procedure, subjects will be asked to rate any pain or discomfort using a 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0= No pain, 10= Extreme pain)
Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 0- immediately after study procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Month 3 Follow Up | Subjects Assessment of Pain: Numerical Pain Rating Scale | 1.96 score on a scale |