Skip to content

The Effects of Subgingival Air-polishing, as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on Periodontal Parameters and Patient Satisfaction in Patients With Periodontitis

The Effects of Subgingival Air-polishing, as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on Periodontal Parameters and Patient Satisfaction in Patients With Periodontitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04477070
Enrollment
22
Registered
2020-07-20
Start date
2020-07-21
Completion date
2023-10-21
Last updated
2021-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Brief summary

Periodontal disease is serious and global chronic disease. The prevalence of periodontal diseases in United Arab Emirates is not clear but data from Dubai Health Authority showed that one in five patients has received periodontal treatment in recent years. Several studies reported the additional benefits provided by the use of air-polishing devices in combination with ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of gum disease, their use may reduce postoperative pain and discomfort while providing improvement in gum status. The aim of the study is to compare the effect of removing bacterial deposit (biofilm) from deep tooth pocket using combined air-polishing and conventional pocket debridement versus conventional pocket debridement alone on tooth supporting tissue parameters in patients with advanced gum disease (periodontitis). Methodology: A total of 22 patients with advanced gum disease will be randomly allocated to two groups: a control group, which will receive conventional pocket debridement and a test group which will receive ultrasonic debridement with air-polishing (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). Gum measurements will be recorded by a masked calibrated examiner at six points for each tooth and patients' postoperative experience and satisfaction will be assessed using special forms.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAir-polishing with ultrasonic debridement

Use of air-polishing and ultrasonic device (Airflow Prophylaxis Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) to remove plaque and calculus from the surface of the roots of teeth.

Use of scaling instruments to remove plaque and calculus from the surface of the roots of teeth.

Sponsors

Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 or over. * Diagnosed with unstable generalised periodontitis, stage III-IV and grade B or C. * Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments. * Absence of systemic disease that will may affect the treatment outcome. * Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Received periodontal treatment in the last 12 months. * Received systemic anti-inflammatory or antibiotic in the last 6 months or during the study period. * Use of medication known to affect the gingival growth. * Chronic bronchitis. * Asthma. * Participants that require prophylactic antibiotic. * Pregnant or breastfeeding participants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Full mouth plaque score (FMPS)Change from baseline FMPS at six monthsThe plaque score is calculated by expressing as a percentage the number of surfaces harbouring plaque related to the total number of tooth surfaces.
Full mouth bleeding score (FMBS)Change from baseline FMBS at six monthsThe bleeding score is calculated by expressing as a percentage the number of sites that bleed upon probing in relation to the total number of tooth sites.
Probing pocket depths (PPDs)Change from baseline PPDs at six monthsPPD is the depth from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus and it is measured in millimeters at several locations around the whole circumference of the tooth.
Clinical attachment levels (CALs)Change from baseline CALs at six monthsCAL is calculated from a fixed reference point (cementoenamel junction or CEJ), and it is computed by calculating the distance from the CEJ to the base of the pocket in millimeters.
Number of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mmChange from baseline number of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mm at six monthsNumber of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mm. PPD is the depth from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus and it is measured in millimeters at several locations around the whole circumference of the tooth.
Percentages of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mmChange from baseline percentages of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mm at six monthsPercentages of sites with PPDs ≥ 6 mm. PPD is the depth from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus and it is measured in millimeters at several locations around the whole circumference of the tooth.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating timeBaselineTime required to complete the treatment
Quality of life measuresChange from baseline GOHAI score at six months daysPatient's quality of life will be evaluated using general oral health assessment index (GOHAI). The GOHAI has 12 negatively and positively worded items evaluating three dimensions of oral health related quality of life (physical function, pain or discomfort and psychosocial function). The score ranged from 0 to 60. The scores are maintained for the three items able to swallow comfortably, able to eat without discomfort, pleased with look of teeth, and reversed for the remaining nine items, so that a higher score was associated with a more positive oral health.
Postoperative painChange from baseline pain at seven daysPatient-related outcomes (pain) will be measured using visual analogue scale Minimum score 0 Maximum score 10 Higher score indicates worse outcome
Postoperative swellingChange from baseline swelling at seven daysPatient-related outcomes (swelling) will be measured using visual analogue scale Minimum score 0 Maximum score 10 Higher score indicates worse outcome
Postoperative bleedingChange from baseline bleeding at seven daysPatient-related outcomes (bleeding) will be measured using visual analogue scale Minimum score 0 Maximum score 10 Higher score indicates worse outcome
Postoperative bruisingChange from baseline bruising at seven daysPatient-related outcomes (bruising) will be measured using visual analogue scale Minimum score 0 Maximum score 10 Higher score indicates worse outcome
Postoperative root sensitivityChange from baseline root sensitivity at seven daysPatient-related outcomes (root sensitivity) will be measured using visual analogue scale Minimum score 0 Maximum score 10 Higher score indicates worse outcome

Countries

United Arab Emirates

Contacts

Primary ContactMomen A Atieh, BDS, MSc, DClinDent, PhD
momen.atieh@mbru.ac.ae+97143838905

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026