Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Arrhythmia
Conditions
Keywords
Clinical and Economical impact, Treatment pathway, Emergency Room, Atrial Fibrillation
Brief summary
Investigators developed a multidimensional protocol for the management of AF in the emergency department. Investigators aimed to assess if this new ER AF management protocol would result in better outcomes compared to routine care.
Detailed description
Management variation such as selecting rate vs rhythm control, timing and need for thromboembolic treatment, ER vs inpatient treatment and cardiology consultation could lead to disparate care of patients. Therefore, there is a need for future studies to standardize practice leading to improved management, decreased rates of hospitalization and overall cost. Investigators developed a multidimensional protocol for the management of AF in the emergency department. Investigators aimed to assess if this new ER AF management protocol would result in better outcomes compared to routine care.
Interventions
All patients with AF as primary problem treated with study protocol would be compared with historical cohort of AF patients who were treated with routine care in the ER. Patients will be followed up and outcomes will be compared between two groups at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Consecutive patients \> 18 years of age who comes to the ER with AF as the primary diagnosis and is treated according to study protocol.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with established cardiology or electrophysiology care.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative resource utilization in dollars | 15 months | Primary Outcome |
| Time to definitive therapy (AAD and or Ablation) | 15 months | Primary Outcome |
| Number of Hospital/clinic visits | 15 months | Primary Outcome |
Countries
United States