Skip to content

To Assess the Efficacy and Safety of INCB054707 in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of the Efficacy and Safety of INCB054707 in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04476043
Enrollment
209
Registered
2020-07-17
Start date
2020-08-25
Completion date
2023-08-16
Last updated
2025-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Inversa, Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of INCB054707 in participants with hidradenitis suppurativa over a 16-week placebo-controlled treatment period followed by a 36-week open-label extension period. All eligible participants will be invited to continue treatment for an additional 48-week Long-term extension period (also open label).

Interventions

Oral; Tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Oral; Tablet

Sponsors

Incyte Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Triple

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HS disease duration of at least 3 months before screening. * Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children. * Active HS in at least 2 distinct anatomical areas. * Participants agree NOT to use topical antiseptics on the areas affected by HS lesions during the placebo-controlled 16-week treatment period

Exclusion criteria

* Draining fistula count of \> 20 at screening or baseline. * Women who are pregnant (or who are considering pregnancy) or lactating. * Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or platelet dysfunction, Q-wave interval abnormalities, current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator. * History of failure to treatment of inflammatory diseases with JAK inhibitors. * Have evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. * Participants known to be infected with HIV, Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C. * Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined ranges.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16Baseline; Week 16Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12HiSCR was defined as at least a 50% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The IHS4 is a composite, dynamic score and validated tool used to determine Hidradenitis Suppurativa severity. It employs a weighted scale using the number of inflammatory nodules, the number of abscesses, and the number of draining tunnels (fistulas or sinuses), with respective weight factors of 1, 2, and 4. Scores: mild=0-3; moderate=4-10; severe ≥11. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% decrease, respectively, from Baseline in AN count.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16Baseline; Week 16HiSCR, the key secondary endpoint, was defined as at least a 50% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.
Percentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16Total AN count was assessed throughout the study.
Mean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)up to Week 16An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.
Mean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Poland, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 209 participants were enrolled at 36 study centers: 26 in North America and 10 in Europe. Data are reported through the cut-off date of 15 December 2021.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received oral placebo once a day (QD) for 16 weeks in the Placebo-controlled Treatment Period.
52
INCB054707 15 mg
Participants received oral INCB054707 15 milligrams (mg) QD for 16 weeks in the Placebo-controlled Treatment Period.
52
INCB054707 45 mg
Participants received oral INCB054707 45 mg QD for 16 weeks in the Placebo-controlled Treatment Period.
52
INCB054707 75 mg
Participants received oral INCB054707 75 mg QD for 16 weeks in the Placebo-controlled Treatment Period.
53
Total209

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1121
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1341

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicINCB054707 15 mgINCB054707 45 mgPlaceboINCB054707 75 mgTotal
Age, Continuous38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.85
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.51
35.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05
Mean abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count11.8 abscesses and inflammatory nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
12.9 abscesses and inflammatory nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.34
11.2 abscesses and inflammatory nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.85
10.6 abscesses and inflammatory nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.24
11.6 abscesses and inflammatory nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48
Mean abscess, inflammatory nodule (IN), and draining fistula (DF) (ANF) count14.1 abscesses, INs, and DFs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
15.1 abscesses, INs, and DFs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
13.6 abscesses, INs, and DFs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
12.2 abscesses, INs, and DFs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94
13.7 abscesses, INs, and DFs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
Mean International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) score22.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.24
23.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.79
22.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.02
18.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.25
21.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
13 Participants12 Participants10 Participants16 Participants51 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Captured as Other
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants7 Participants10 Participants6 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants44 Participants41 Participants47 Participants179 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
36 Participants35 Participants40 Participants36 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants39 Participants43 Participants39 Participants158 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants13 Participants9 Participants14 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 520 / 520 / 500 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 5220 / 5217 / 5019 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 522 / 521 / 500 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups for this population were defined according to the treatment assignment at randomization. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-2.5 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.88
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-5.2 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.86
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-6.9 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.88
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16-6.3 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.85
p-value: 0.027795% CI: [-5.2, -0.3]MMRM
p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-6.8, -1.9]MMRM
p-value: 0.002195% CI: [-6.2, -1.4]MMRM
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-1.8 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.74
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-2.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.83
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-2.6 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.92
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-2.6 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.96
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-2.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.99
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-2.4 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 1.06
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-5.1 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 1.03
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-4.4 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.93
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-2.9 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.72
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-4.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.9
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-3.5 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.82
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-5.0 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.97
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-5.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.82
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-6.4 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.92
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-7.5 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.96
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-7.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 1.05
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-7.7 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.98
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-4.0 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.74
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-7.6 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.95
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-7.6 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 1.02
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-6.2 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.8
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-6.8 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.92
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-4.4 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.71
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Abscess, Inflammatory Nodule (IN), and Draining Fistula (DF) (ANF) Count From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-7.1 abscesses, INs, and DFsStandard Error 0.89
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 8-2.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.82
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 4-3.0 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.71
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 12-2.8 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.84
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 6-2.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 2-1.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.69
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 6-4.8 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.76
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 8-4.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.79
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 12-5.0 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.82
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 4-3.6 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.7
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 2-2.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.66
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 6-5.3 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.77
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 2-3.4 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.69
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 4-4.8 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.71
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 8-6.4 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.82
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 12-6.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.84
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 8-5.7 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.79
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 4-5.3 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.69
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 2-4.0 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.66
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 6-6.2 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.75
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in AN Count at Weeks 2 to 12Week 12-6.5 abscesses and inflammatory nodulesStandard Error 0.81
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 16-0.3 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 6-0.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.14
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 40.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.3 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.17
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 8-0.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.46
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.23
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline2.4 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 3.97
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 60.1 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.85
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline2.3 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 4.44
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.01
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 40.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.11
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 80.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.1
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 120.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.71
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 160.1 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 3.25
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.6 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.62
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 6-1.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.95
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 8-1.1 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.82
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline2.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 4.04
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 16-0.8 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 3.2
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.87
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.8 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.59
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.0 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.61
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.2 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 1.3
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 6-0.8 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.62
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Baseline1.6 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.85
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 16-1.1 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.57
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.6 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.44
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in Draining Fistula Count From Weeks 2 to 16Change from Baseline at Week 8-0.8 draining fistulasStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The IHS4 is a composite, dynamic score and validated tool used to determine Hidradenitis Suppurativa severity. It employs a weighted scale using the number of inflammatory nodules, the number of abscesses, and the number of draining tunnels (fistulas or sinuses), with respective weight factors of 1, 2, and 4. Scores: mild=0-3; moderate=4-10; severe ≥11. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment group (placebo and INCB054707 15, 45, and 75 mg), stratification factors (disease severity \[Hurley Stage I, II, and III\] and geographical region \[North America and outside of North America\]), visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16), treatment by visit interaction, and covariates of Baseline measurement and Baseline measurement by visit interaction. The variance-covariance matrix of the within-participant errors in MMRM are modeled as unstructured.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.77
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.96
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.92
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-3.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
INCB054707 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.76
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-9.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-10.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-11.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-11.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.96
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-11.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
INCB054707 45 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.16
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 12-11.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 16-12.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 4-9.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 8-10.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.78
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 2-6.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
INCB054707 75 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Severity of the Disease, as Assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score, From Weeks 2 to 16Week 6-10.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.71
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.

Time frame: up to Week 16

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of INCB054707 or placebo during the Placebo-controlled Period

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)34 Participants
INCB054707 15 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)31 Participants
INCB054707 45 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)30 Participants
INCB054707 75 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)32 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16

HiSCR, the key secondary endpoint, was defined as at least a 50% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

Population: ITT Population. 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method. Missing post-Baseline values were imputed as nonresponders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 1628.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 1648.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 1644.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 1645.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.044595% CI: [1, 5.3]Wald test
p-value: 0.099895% CI: [0.9, 4.6]Wald test
p-value: 0.082995% CI: [0.9, 4.7]Wald test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12

HiSCR was defined as at least a 50% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: ITT Population. 95% CI was based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method. Missing post-Baseline values were imputed as nonresponders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 828.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 425.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 1230.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 617.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 215.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 632.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 836.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 1242.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 436.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 225.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 648.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 234.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 444.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 844.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 1248.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 852.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 449.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 234.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 652.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a HiSCR at Weeks 2 Through 12Week 1258.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16

AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% decrease, respectively, from Baseline in AN count.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. 95% CI was based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method. Missing post-Baseline values were imputed as nonresponders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1617.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 21.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 60.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1223.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 821.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 47.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 430.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 613.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 123.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 632.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 215.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 163.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 125.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 836.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 85.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1244.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 163.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 65.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1636.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 83.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 20.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 855.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 225.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 444.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 646.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1251.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1655.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 29.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 415.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 625.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 828.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1232.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1636.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 23.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 45.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 65.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 815.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1217.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1617.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 23.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 43.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 63.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 813.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1213.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1615.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1636.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1657.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 21.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 234.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 47.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1255.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 853.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 611.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 811.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 819.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 67.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1213.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 651.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1611.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1619.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 21.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 446.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1211.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 423.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 45.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 632.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 832.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 213.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1236.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 45.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1618.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 69.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 458.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 211.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1262.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1617.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 1652.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 45.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 27.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 837.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 1218.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 69.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 854.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 418.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 239.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 818.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1634.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN50, Week 656.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN100, Week 817.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 1239.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN90, Week 1220.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 626.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 From Weeks 2 to 16AN75, Week 220.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16

HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% decrease from Baseline in AN count with no increase in the number of abscesses or draining fistulas.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. 95% CI was based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method. Missing post-Baseline values were imputed as nonresponders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1617.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 819.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 21.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 69.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1219.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 47.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1226.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1630.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 415.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 29.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 617.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 823.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 213.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 421.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1232.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 830.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1628.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 628.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1630.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 218.9 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 415.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 624.5 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1239.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 835.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16

Total AN count was assessed throughout the study.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 24.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 414.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 613.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 828.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1228.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1625.6 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1644.4 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 830.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 29.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 619.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 420.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 15 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1233.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 420.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 631.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 838.3 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1651.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1246.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 45 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 216.7 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1238.8 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 1637.0 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 423.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 841.2 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 223.1 percentage of participants
INCB054707 75 mgPercentage of Participants With a Total AN Count of 0 to 2 From Weeks 2 to 16Week 638.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026