Skip to content

Osteochondral Lesions Under 15mm2 of the Talus; is Iliac Crest Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate the Key to Success?

'A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Clinical Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stimulation Combined With the Insertion of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for the Treatment of Small Primary and Non-primary Talar Osteochondral Lesions'

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04475341
Acronym
OUTBACK
Enrollment
96
Registered
2020-07-17
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2024-09-02
Last updated
2020-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteochondral Lesion of Talus

Brief summary

Osteochondral defects (OCDs) of the talus have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. When OCDs are of small nature (up to 15 mm in diameter), and have failed conservative management, surgical intervention may be necessary. For small cystic defects the current treatment is an arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) procedure, during which the damaged cartilage is resected and the subchondral bone is microfractured (MF), in order to disrupt intraosseous blood vessels and thereby introduce blood and bone marrow cells into the debrided lesion, forming a microfracture fibrin clot, which contains a dilute stem cell population from the underlying bone marrow. This procedure has been reported to have a 75% successful long-term outcome. Recently, the additional use of biological adjuncts has become popular, one of them being bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) from the iliac crest. BMAC consists of mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells and growth factors, which may therefore theoretically improve the quality of subchondral plate and cartilage repair. The current evidence for treating talar OCDs with BMS plus BMAC is limited and heterogeneous. It is unclear to what extent the treatment of talar OCDs with BMS plus BMAC is beneficial in comparison to BMS alone.

Detailed description

Osteochondral defects (OCDs) of the talus have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. When OCDs are of small nature (up to 15 mm in diameter), and have failed conservative management, surgical intervention may be necessary. For small cystic defects the current treatment is an arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) procedure, during which the damaged cartilage is resected and the subchondral bone is microfractured (MF), in order to disrupt intraosseous blood vessels and thereby introduce blood and bone marrow cells into the debrided lesion, forming a microfracture fibrin clot, which contains a dilute stem cell population from the underlying bone marrow. This procedure has been reported to have a 75% successful long-term outcome. Recently, the additional use of biological adjuncts has become popular, one of them being bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) from the iliac crest. BMAC consists of mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells and growth factors, which may therefore theoretically improve the quality of subchondral plate and cartilage repair. The current evidence for treating talar OCDs with BMS plus BMAC is limited and heterogeneous. It is unclear to what extent the treatment of talar OCDs with BMS plus BMAC is beneficial in comparison to BMS alone.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBMS + Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Both groups of patients are surgically treated with arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS). The control group will receive BMS alone but with a sham-treatment consisting of a Jamashidi (bone marrow aspiration) needle puncture of the iliac crest. The aspirated bone marrow concentrate will be collected and sent for cell characterisation but will not be inserted in the talar OCD. The intervention group will also receive arthroscopic BMS. From this group, BMAC from the iliac crest will be taken by the same needle puncture. Part of this concentrate will be sent for cell characterisation. Another part will be implanted into the talar OCD.

PROCEDUREBMS alone

Both groups of patients are surgically treated with arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS). The control group will receive BMS alone but with a sham-treatment consisting of a Jamashidi (bone marrow aspiration) needle puncture of the iliac crest. The aspirated bone marrow concentrate will be collected and sent for cell characterisation but will not be inserted in the talar OCD. The intervention group will also receive arthroscopic BMS. From this group, BMAC from the iliac crest will be taken by the same needle puncture. Part of this concentrate will be sent for cell characterisation. Another part will be implanted into the talar OCD.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a symptomatic OCL of the talus who are scheduled for arthroscopic debridement and microfracture * OCL depth and/or diameter ≤ 15 mm on computed tomography medial-lateral and/or anterior-posterior * Age 18 years or older * Intact remaining articular cartilage of the joint Kellgren-Lawrence stage 0-1

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant OCL of the tibia * Ankle osteoarthritis grade 2 or 3 van Dijk et al. \[53\] * Ankle fracture \< 6 months before scheduled arthroscopy * Inflammatory arthropathy (e.g Rheumatoid arthritis) * History of (or current) hemopoeitic disease or immunotherapy * Acute or chronic instability of the ankle * Use of prescribed orthopaedic shoewear * Other concomitant painful or disabling disease of the lower limb * Pregnancy * Implanted pacemaker * Participation in previous trials \< 1 year, in which the subject has been exposed to radiation (radiographs or CT) * Patients who are unable to fill out questionnaires and cannot have them filled out * No informed consent * HIV positive or hepatitis B or C infection (based on the anamnesis of the patient)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Numeric Rating Scale of Pain During Weightbearing2 years post-operatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AOFASpreoperativelyAmerican Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
FAOSpre-operativelyFoot and Ankle Outcome Score
NRS in restpre-operativelyNumeric Rating Scale of Pain During Rest
NRS during runningpre-operativelyNumeric Rating Scale of Pain During Running
NRS during stair-climbingpre-operativelyNumeric Rating Scale of Pain During Stair-Climbing
NRS during performing sportspre-operativelyNumeric Rating Scale of Pain During Sports
NRS during weight-bearingpre-operativelyNumeric Rating Scale of Pain During Weightbearing
FAAMpre-operativelyFoot and Ankle Ability Measure
SF-12pre-operativelyShort-Form 12
EQ5Dpre-operatively
Return to sportspost-operatively until 2 years of follow-up post-operatively
Return to workpost-operatively until 2 years of follow-up post-operatively
Radiological outcomes: CT-scan (depth, wide, length, joint space measurement)pre-operatively
Radiological outcomes: MRI scan (T2 relaxation times)Pre-operatively
Cost-effectivinessFrom per-operatively to post-operatively at 2 years (one period)all relevant clinical costs will be scored through a patient diary
Cell-subset analysisper-operativelyprotein analyses will be performed by Sanquin
Demographic dataPre-operativelyall kinds of demographic data will be assessed (age, gender, etc.)
ComplicationsFrom per-operatively to post-operatively at 2 years (one period)all types of complications
Re-operationsFrom per-operatively to post-operatively at 2 years (one period)re-operations will be assessed
Ankle Activity Scale (AAS)pre-operatively

Contacts

Primary ContactJari Dahmen, MD, BSc
j.dahmen@amsterdamumc.nl+31638522988

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026