Skip to content

Quality Improvement Project - My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!; (Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!)

A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around! (Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!) Development and Evaluation of a Consensus and Evidence Based Psychosocial Therapy Tool in a Preliminary Psychosocial Study on Therapy Optimization.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04474678
Enrollment
240
Registered
2020-07-17
Start date
2020-09-07
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Tumor, Hematologic Diseases, Leukemia, Neuroblastoma, Neurofibromatoses, Sarcoma

Brief summary

In this study, the main goal is to implement and evaluate a novel, evidence-based psycho-educative program for children in oncological care. Patients are provided with booklets tailored to each specific stage of their treatment. Among other factors, children's emotional well-being is evaluated as well as feasibility. The study is carried out at multiple sites across Austria, Germany and Italy/South Tirol.

Detailed description

It is well documented that the prevalence of mental disorders in childhood cancer survivors is twice to quadruple compared to healthy controls. Effects range from impaired emotional balance, fear of recidivisms, helplessness, depression to post traumatic stress disorder. As a basis for interventions to preventively address these issues and moreover, to achieve defined psychosocial goals in the field of paediatric oncology, guidelines and standards systematically describe stressors and resources in particularly challenging situations. Nevertheless, despite these guidelines, actual care is quite heterogenous due to differences in setting, provision and profession. Studies show that integrated models of psychosocial care yield better outcomes. Integrated care systems can enhance patient satisfaction, increase perceived quality of care, and enable access to services and reduce service costs. Highly complex, system-wide interventions such as models of integrated care represent considerable challenges for operationalisation of relevant factors and evaluation of whole processes compared to single interventions (e.g. relaxation techniques). Quality improvement (QI) is an iterative process designed to make controlled changes within the health care delivery system to provide patients with high-quality care that meets both their expectations and needs. In terms of quality assurance, this QI Project aims to operationalize recommendations of the S3 guideline for psychosocial care which results in a combined process- and patient-oriented intervention and evaluation tool - bridging the gap between standards/evidence and clinical practice. The Onco-Mini-Version of My Logbook - I know my way around already comprises a Starter-Kit and 8 booklets, which cover at least one main issue of every treatment phase: initial contact, medical assessment (MRI), supportive therapy (chemotherapy, radio therapy), rehabilitation and after-care. All interventions are carried out by a clinical psychologist or psychosocial staff specialized in pediatric psychooncology and are understood as part of an integrated care system. Every booklet provides practical materials with enhanced stimulating elements to encourage the child to explore actively. The booklets are structured in two face-to-face sessions covering psychoeducational, activity & practice and reflective aspects. The core of this QI project is a multilevel and interdisciplinary approach characterized by iterative processes. PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles were applied in all steps of conceptualization and implementation of this project. It aims to systematically improve psychosocial care of pediatric cancer patients through being implemented in a large number of hospitals in the German-speaking world. The proposed multicenter pilot phase promotes emotional well-being and level of information of the child during treatment through transfer of knowledge and coping skills. Moreover, it addresses feasibility of the tool but also the impact of medical procedures on feasibility. In the long term, the program is intended to help attenuate psychological late effects of oncological conditions and their treatments.

Interventions

OTHERMy Logbook! - I know my way around!

Special issues/booklets of My Logbook - I know my way around! - Every booklet is based on evidence-based interventions. It illustrates psychosocial and interdisciplinary processes in a standardized way, resulting in a practical guide (My Logbook) to accompany the child throughout all stages of oncological treatment.

Sponsors

St. Anna Kinderspital, Austria
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER
Cnopfsche Kinderklinik, Nürnberg
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kepler University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Saarland
CollaboratorOTHER
Hannover Medical School
CollaboratorOTHER
Krankenhaus Bozen
CollaboratorOTHER
Goethe University
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Muenster
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Tuebingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Salzburger Landeskliniken
CollaboratorOTHER
Leuwaldhof St.Veit (Kinder- und Jugendreha)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Essen
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Graz
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Erlangen
CollaboratorOTHER
Wuerzburg University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Klinik Bad Oexen, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitätsklinikum Köln
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Regensburg
CollaboratorOTHER
Luca-Dethlefsen-Hilfe e.V.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

experimental group: * currently or formerly treated for oncological condition * children/families at standard risk (Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM)) * at least average cognitive abilities (as measured via intelligence test) Inclusion Criteria control group: * currently or formerly treated for oncological condition

Exclusion criteria

* non-German speaking * Major vision impairments * Major auditive impairments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emotional well-being, T1Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Emotional well-being, T2Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Emotional well-being, T3During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Emotional well-being, T4During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Emotional well-being, T5During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Knowledgeability, T1Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from beginner to expert. Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Knowledgeability, T2Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from beginner to expert. Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Knowledgeability, T3During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from beginner to expert. Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Knowledgeability, T4During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from beginner to expert. Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Knowledgeability, T5During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearPatients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from beginner to expert. Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Feasibility of programFeasibility of program is evaluated following the second session which on average takes place one to six months after start of the treatment of the special issue (booklet). - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 yearRating of feasibility of the program by medical staff

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intelligence testDuring the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three MonthsPatients are administered a standardized intelligence test, dependent on their age, e.g. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV WISC-IV, Petermann & Petermann, 2014 or other comparable methods due to clinical standards
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1999)During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three MonthsThe Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire about 3-16 year olds.
KINDLR (Ravens-Sieberer & Bullinger, 2000)During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three MonthsThe KINDLR is a standardized questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents.
Questionnaire on Health Competence in Children and Adolescents, (Weiler, Fohn, Pletschko, Schwarzinger, & Leiss, 2017)During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three MonthsQuestionnaire for the assessment of health competence in children and adolescents
Medical informationWithin the first week of treatment - up to three MonthsDiagnosis, date of diagnosis, pre-existing conditions, secondary conditions, form of treatment/therapy, psychiatric diagnoses, neurological status
Demographic dataDuring the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three MonthsAge of patient, sex, parents' education, parents' profession, school form, mother language of patient

Countries

Austria, Germany, Italy, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026