Skip to content

Catheter-directed Thrombectomy in High and Intermediate-high Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Continuous Aspiration Thrombectomy in High and Intermediate-high Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04473560
Acronym
CATH-PE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-07-16
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism With Acute Cor Pulmonale

Keywords

pulmonary embolism

Brief summary

Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular death. Pulmonary embolism may be life-threatening condition with an estimated 30-day mortality rate about 10-30%. In high-risk pulmonary embolism, systemic thrombolysis is indicated, whereas recent development of interventional cardiology has made catheter-directed techniques an important alternative to thrombolytic therapy. The controversy concerns also risk stratification and treatment in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients. A significant percentage of intermediate-high risk patients with pulmonary embolism may experience rapid hemodynamic deterioration and then the prognosis in this group is significantly worse. Catheter-directed techniques are aimed to quickly relive obstruction and restore pulmonary blood flow, thus increasing cardiac output and immediately restoring hemodynamic stability. The scope of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of catheter-directed approaches in high-risk and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients.

Detailed description

Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular death. Pulmonary embolism may be life-threatening condition with an estimated 30-day mortality rate about 10-30%. In high-risk pulmonary embolism, systemic thrombolysis is indicated, whereas recent development of interventional cardiology has made catheter-directed techniques an important alternative to thrombolytic therapy. The controversy concerns also risk stratification and treatment in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients. A significant percentage of intermediate-high risk patients with pulmonary embolism may experience rapid hemodynamic deterioration and then the prognosis in this group is significantly worse. Catheter-directed techniques are aimed to quickly relive obstruction and restore pulmonary blood flow, thus increasing cardiac output and immediately restoring hemodynamic stability. The scope of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of catheter-directed approaches in high-risk and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients. The primary data recorded include details of each patient's clinical status, co-morbidities with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the implemented catheter-directed therapy, the results of additional studies (lab tests results, electrocardiogram, imaging studies), and the outcome. The study endpoints comprise technical success, clinically relevant procedure-related complications or bleeding events, classified according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 guidelines criteria. Collecting the fore mentioned data allows for clinicians to better manage the pulmonary embolism patients with increased mortality risk.

Interventions

DEVICECatheter-directed thrombectomy

Using common femoral venous access the pigtail diagnostic catheter will be placed into the main pulmonary artery and an initial pulmonary angiogram will be performed to demonstrate the location and extent of thrombi in pulmonary arteries. Then pulmonary arterial pressures will be measured. Subsequently an Indigo catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, California) will be placed and a direct-aspiration first-pass technique will be performed purposefully to attach a large thrombus to the catheter tip by suction and then pull it out through the sheath. The decision to terminate the intervention will be at operator's discretion after careful evaluation of hemodynamic parameters (restoration of the systolic blood pressure≥100 mmHg, heart rate \<100/min), improvement of arterial blood saturation≥ 92%, practicable clot burden reduction and total amount of aspirated blood (no more than 300 ml).

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical symptoms and presentation consistent with pulmonary embolism (PE). 2. PE symptoms duration ≤ 14 days. 3. High risk PE patients with absolute contraindications to systemic thrombolysis or its failure (refractory circulatory collapse) not eligible for surgical embolectomy. 4. Intermediate-high risk PE patients with right ventricle dysfunction confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography or transthoracic echocardiography and elevated troponin level with concomitant at least one of below criterium for minimum 24 hours: 1. Systolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg and ≤ 100 mmHg 2. Heart rate ≥ 110/min, 3. Arterial blood saturation \<90% during spontaneous breathing (atm) 5. Intermediate-high risk PE patients with right ventricle dysfunction confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography or transthoracic echocardiography and elevated troponin level with sudden occurrence of one or more of the below listed factors: 1. Systolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg and ≤ 100 mmHg 2. Heart rate≥ 110/min, 3. Arterial blood saturation \<90% during spontaneous breathing (atm)

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy. 2. Refusal to sign the informed consent form. 3. Presence of intracardiac thrombus. 4. Diagnosed thrombophilia. 5. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets count below 20 000 µL). 6. History of severe or chronic pulmonary hypertension. 7. Serum creatinine level higher than 1.8 mg/dl. 8. Known serious and uncontrolled sensitivity to radiographic agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of pulmonary arterial pressuresImmediately after catheter-directed thrombectomy procedureIncidence of the reduction of systolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressures (mmHg) more than 10% immediately after CDT procedure.
Reduction of vascular obstructionImmediately after catheter-directed thrombectomy procedureIncidence of the at least 50% reduction of vascular obstruction in the angiography assessed with Miller Index score
Clinical improvement during catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) procedureImmediately after catheter-directed thrombectomy procedureIncidence of arterial blood saturation increase \>92%
Ventricular strain reduction24 hours after catheter-directed thrombectomyRate of right ventricular strain reduction (right ventricle/left ventricle ratio assessment) in echocardiography 24 hours after the CDT.
Early mortality rate from pulmonary embolism24 hours after catheter-directed thrombectomyNumber of patients who died from pulmonary embolism (right heart failure) during the first 24 hours after CDT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events incidence3 months after catheter-directed thrombectomyIncidence of pulmonary vascular injury assessed on angiography
Total mortality rate from pulmonary embolism3 months after catheter-directed thrombectomy1\. Number of patients who died from pulmonary embolism (right heart failure)
Bleeding events incidence3 months after catheter-directed thrombectomyIncidence of major bleedings assessed using The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactAleksander Araszkiewicz, Assoc. Prof.
aaraszkiewicz@ump.edu.pl+488549293
Backup ContactSylwia Sławek-Szmyt, MD, PhD
sylwia.slawek@skpp.edu.pl+48 8549293

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026