Skip to content

Combined Simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy Trial (CoSi Endoscopy)

Combined Simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy (CoSi Endoscopy) Harmlessly Reduces Procedure Times: a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04473456
Enrollment
51
Registered
2020-07-16
Start date
2020-06-13
Completion date
2020-09-23
Last updated
2020-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procedure Time

Keywords

Combined simultaneous (CoSi) endoscopy, EGD, Colonoscopy

Brief summary

The COVID -19 pandemic has reduced endoscopy services to an average of 83% producing a significant economic impact on endoscopy units worldwide. Endoscopy as an aerosol-generating procedure requires endoscopy units to allow 12 cycles of air exchange per hour, equivalent to 20 minutes, between patients, to reduce medical risk exposure. Planning strategies to facilitate economic reactivation of endoscopy services in a responsible manner, maintaining adequate security measures for both patients and healthcare personnel is currently a major challenge. Serial endoscopic interventions as esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy are commonly performed during the same sedation time. Estimated times for quality inspection in the upper digestive tract and the colon, are 7 and 6 minutes, respectively. In addition, time to reach the cecum and to set up the following procedure increase not only procedure time but SARS-CoV-2 exposure to healthcare personnel. Performing these two procedures simultaneously by two endoscopists would considerably reduce procedure time while increasing the number of patients evaluated in one day, especially in the period of service reactivation. There are no studies comparing simultaneous EGD and colonoscopy procedures and, serial procedures. This study aims to determine differences in procedures times between simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy and conventional serial EGD-colonoscopy as an alternative to improve the number of procedures/hour/unit during the COVID-19 era.

Detailed description

Study type: This is a prospective controlled randomized study to determine differences in procedure times of simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy and serial EGD-colonoscopy. Patients are randomized into two groups: the serial group, where the EGD is performed first and thereafter the colonoscopy and, the simultaneous group, where the two procedures are performed at the same time, each by a trained gastroenterologist. Patients: Eligible patients are those consecutively scheduled for EGD and colonoscopy at EmuraCenter LatinoAmerica, Bogota DC, Colombia between June and August, 2020. Indications for procedures include among others abdominal pain, screening for digestive cancer, chronic anemia, digestive bleeding, and chronic diarrhea. Exclusion criteria are inadequate bowel preparation with Boston score with at least 1 point in any segment, residual gastric food, previous digestive system surgery, and refusal to participate. Patients and their accompanying person give written consent of the procedures and are asked to complete a telephone survey related to COVID-19 symptoms 1 day before the procedure and 30 minutes before the procedure. Randomization: Endoscopists participating in the study are experts endoscopists. In both groups, colonoscopies are performed by the same expert endoscopist. EGD in the serial group is performed by the attending endoscopist responsible for procedures that day. Outcomes: Variables to be compared between groups include unit entry's time, time to completion of both procedures, EGD time, EGD inspection time, colonoscopy time, time to teach the cecum, withdrawal time, inter-procedure time, unit's exit time, the dose of sedation agent and endoscopic findings. Oxygenation (pO2) and percutaneous pCo2 are evaluated 5 minutes before, 5, and 10 minutes during the procedure and 5 minutes after completing the last procedure. A trained physician or anesthesiologist will administrate sedation to patients using Propofol. Post-procedure symptoms will be assessed by written survey 30 minutes and 24 hours after the procedure. This survey evaluates 6 symptoms, 3 of which are related to sedation: Nausea, drowsiness, and dizziness. and, the other 3 symptoms are related to the endoscopic procedure: abdominal pain, bloating, and pharyngeal pain. Each of the 6 symptoms will be scored from 1 to 5 (1: None, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe, and 5: Extreme). Patient position and location of endoscopy systems: All patients are positioned in the left lateral decubitus position. For simultaneous procedures, the EGD tower is located to the left side and the colonoscopy tower at the right side of the bedside at the level patient's head. EGD: The systematic complete photodocumentation approach proposed by Emura et al will be carried out to inspect the upper GI tract mucosa using a Fuji 7000 video processor and a Fuji Lasereo EG-760 gastroscope. BLI-bright digital chromoendoscopy will be performed to observe the hypopharynx, the esophagus, and the esophagogastric junction and, the LCI mode for evaluation of the stomach and duodenal mucosa. Low CO2 insufflation will be used using the Fuji GW-100 insufflator. Colonoscopy in the serial group: A Fuji Lasereo 7000 equipment and an EC-760ZP-V / L colonoscope will be used. The CO2 insufflation will be carried out with Fuji GW-100 equipment. Colonoscopy in the parallel-group: An Olympus Evis Exera II equipment and an H-180-AI colonoscope will be used. An Olympus UCR insufflator will be used for CO2 insufflation. Transcutaneous measurement of pCo2: The pCO2 measurements will be performed using a Tosca TCM kit (XLab Solutions). This equipment uses a transducer (ts sensor 54) that is positioned on the patient's arm and measures pCO2 non-invasively.

Interventions

PROCEDURESimultaneous EGD and colonoscopy

Patients are examined simultaneously by EGD and colonoscopy

Sponsors

Universidad de la Sabana
CollaboratorOTHER
EmuraCenter LatinoAmerica
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants, care providers, and outcomes evaluator are masked.

Intervention model description

Patients are randomly assigned to non-intervention and intervention (simultaneous EGD and colonoscopy) arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible patients are those scheduled for EGD and colonoscopy at EmuraCenter Latinoamerica, Bogota DC, Colombia between June and August 2020. Procedure indications: abdominal pain, chronic anemia, chronic diarrhea, cancer screening, gastrointestinal bleeding.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedures timeTime elapsed in minutes between the starting of the first procedure and the ending time of the second procedure in the serial arm or both procedures in the simultaneous arm.Time elapsed in minutes between the starting of the first procedure and the ending time of the second procedure in the serial arm or both procedures in the simultaneous arm.
Interprocedure timeTime elapsed in minutes between the end of the first procedure and the starting of the second procedure (only applies in serial arm)Time elapsed in minutes between the end of the first procedure and the starting of the second procedure (only applies in serial arm)
Upper GI inspection timeTime taken in minutes to inspect the entire upper GI mucosa according to the complete photodocumentation method proposed by Emura et al.Time taken in minutes to inspect the entire upper GI mucosa according to the complete photodocumentation method proposed by Emura et al.
Colonoscopy withdrawal timeTime elapsed in minutes between the cecum and the lower rectum used to inspect the colorectal mucosaTime elapsed in minutes between the cecum and the lower rectum used to inspect the colorectal mucosa
Colonoscopy insertion timeTime elapsed in minutes to reach the cecumTime elapsed in minutes to reach the cecum
EGD timeTime elapsed in minutes between the insertion of the gastroscope into the mouth and the extraction from the mouthTime elapsed in minutes between the insertion of the gastroscope into the mouth and the extraction from the mouth
Colonoscopy timeTime elapsed in minutes between the insertion of the colonoscope into the lower rectum and the extraction from the lower rectumTime elapsed in minutes between the insertion of the colonoscope into the lower rectum and the extraction from the lower rectum
Propofol used in EGDAmount in mg of Propofol used during EGDAmount in mg of Propofol used during EGD
Propofol used in colonoscopyAmount in mg of Propofol used during colonoscopyAmount in mg of Propofol used during colonoscopy
Propofol used in EGD and colonoscopyAmount of Propofol in mg used fro procedures in the simultaneous armAmount of Propofol in mg used fro procedures in the simultaneous arm.
percutaneous pCO2Measurement of pCO2 by the percutaneous transducer at 5 minutes prior and 5, 10 during procedures and 5 and 10 minutes minutes after completing the last procedure.Measurement of pCO2 by the percutaneous transducer at 5 minutes prior and 5, 10 during procedures and 5 and 10 minutes minutes after completing the last procedure.
percutaneous pO2Measurement of pO2 by the percutaneous transducer at 5 minutes prior and 5, 10 during procedures and 5 and 10 minutes minutes after completing the last procedure.Measurement of pO2 by the percutaneous transducer at 5 minutes prior and 5, 10 during procedures and 5 and 10 minutes minutes after completing the last procedure.
Position change 1During colonoscopyChange of patient's position during colonoscopy. Yes or No answer
Position change 2During olonoscopyIf occurred, how many times the position changed. Numerical variable.
Post procedure symptoms survey related to colonoscopy20 minutes after the last procedure and after 24 hoursNausea, drowsiness, and dizziness are scored by patients using a scale from 1 to 5 (1: None, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe, and 5: Extreme).
Post procedure symptoms survey related to sedation20 minutes after the last procedure and after 24 hoursAbdominal pain, bloating, and pharyngeal pain are scored by patients using a scale from 1 to 5 (1: None, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe, and 5: Extreme).

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026