Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Conditions
Keywords
Cardiac Arrhythmias, Implantable loop recorder, Comparative Analysis
Brief summary
Comparative analysis of available ILR devices models Abbot Confirm RxTM, Medtronic Reveal LINQTM, and Biotronik BIOMONITOR., evaluating detection performance and effective of transmission of these devices to better understand the differences between them.
Detailed description
All devices have different algorithms for arrhythmia detection and structural design. Consequently, these devices vary in sensitivity of arrhythmia detection and data transmission.Therefore, we aim to expand a comparative analysis of available devices, evaluating detection performance and effective of transmission of these devices to better understand the differences between them.
Interventions
DEVICEInsertion of ILR device
All patients enrolled will be randomized to have one of three ILR devices implanted (BIOMONITOR III, Reveal LinQ, or Confirm RX) and will be given event monitoring device for concurrent evaluation.
Sponsors
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patients \> 18 years of age with appropriate indication for ILR for atrial arrhythmia management.
Exclusion criteria
Inability to give consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive predictive values of device detected atrial arrhythmias | 12 months | Positive predictive values of device detected atrial arrhythmias |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactDonita Atkins
Outcome results
None listed