Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CertiroBell® Compared With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Primary Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04471441
Acronym
MONTBLANC
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-07-15
Start date
2020-06-30
Completion date
2024-07-24
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplant

Keywords

Everolimus, CertiroBell, Mycophenolate mofetil

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CertiroBell® tablet compared with mycophenolate mofetil in primary living donor liver transplant recipients.

Detailed description

This study is multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of certirobell® tablet compared with mycophenolate mofetil in primary living donor liver transplant recipients. On the first visit the patients scheduled to be operated liver transplant in 35 days will be conducted screening. Patients who meet the criteria of this clinical trial will be randomized to CertiroBell or mycophenolate mofetil on the second visit. Each group will take CertiroBell or mycophenolate mofetil and will conduct scheduled tests with 5 additional visits.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus Tab.

After first dose 1mg BID(total 2mg daily PO), check the blood concentration of everolimus at each visit and adjust the dose to acheive the blood concentration maintaining at 3\~8ng/mL.

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil Tab./Cap.

Up to 1.5g BID(total 3g daily), PO

Sponsors

Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\* Inclusion Criteria: \[Time of screening\] * Patients who have transplanted in primary living donor liver in 35 days or who plan to be transplanted in primary living donor liver. * Over 20 years old(male or female) * Agreement with written informed consent \[Time of randomization\] - Patients who have transplanted liver within 4 weeks(25 days to 35 days) \*

Exclusion criteria

\[Time of screening\] * Patients who have transplanted non-liver organs or have plan to be transplanted non-liver organs. * Patients with bioartificial liver (cell system) * Patients who diagnosed with malignant tumor within 5 years \[however, who have recovered from skin cancer (squamous cell/basal cell carcinoma) or thyroid cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma without main vessel invasion or extrahepatic metastasis can be enrolled\] * Patients with severe systemic infection * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding or not agree to the proper use of contraception during the trial * Participated in other trial within 4 weeks * In investigator's judgement \[Time of randomization\] * Patients with acute rejection who have been clinically treated after liver transplantation. * Patients with complication related to the hepatic artery such as hepatic artery thrombosis at the time of randomization. * At screening * WBC \<1,500/mm\^3 or PLT \<30,000/mm\^3 or over 3 times upper than normal range of liver function tests(T-bilirubin, AST, ALT) levels * Protein/Creatinine ratio(urine test) \> 1 or eGFR by MDRD\< 30mL/min/1.73m\^2 or Total cholesterol \> 350mg/dL or triglycerides \> 500mg/dL * Patients taking HCV(hepatitis C virus) Therapeutic Drugs * Patients who had plasmapheresis within 1 week. * Patents who had a record of taking mTOR inhibitor before. * In investigator's judgement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of composite efficacy failureuntil 24 weeks after taking medicinecomposite efficacy failure include biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, death, or follow-up failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejectionuntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineacute rejection confirmed by result of biopsy(over 4 points of RAI score)
The pathological results and time of occurrence and method of treatment, result of the treatment of acute rejection confirmed by biopsy(over 4 points of RAI score)until 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicinedetails of acute rejection confirmed by result of biopsy(over 4 points of RAI score)
Incidence of composite efficacy failureuntil 48weeks after taking medicinecomposite efficacy failure include biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, death, or follow-up failure
Survival rate of patientsuntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineSurvival rate of patients
Survival rate of transplanted organuntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineSurvival rate of transplanted organ
Incidence and recurrence rates of liver canceruntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineIncidence and recurrence rates of liver cancer
Incidence and recurrence rates of HCV infectionuntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineIncidence and recurrence rates of HCV infection
Incidence of CMV infectionuntil 24weeks and 48weeks after taking medicineIncidence of CMV infection
variation of Serum creatinine, eGFR(estimated glomerular filtration rate) compared to the baselineat 24 weeks and 48weekseGFR using MDRD(Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) method

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRDong Jin Joo, M.D., Ph.D.

Severance Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026