Skip to content

Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

An Adaptive, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Engensis in Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04469270
Acronym
REGAiN-1A
Enrollment
162
Registered
2020-07-14
Start date
2020-11-20
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2025-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis on pain in participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs, as compared to Placebo, as a second Phase 3, well controlled study, sufficient in supporting the efficacy and safety of Engensis.

Detailed description

Overall Design VMDN-003-2 is an adaptive Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Engensis (containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient VM202) in Participants with painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Following completion of the informed consent process, Screening activities (during 45 days \[from Day -52 to Day -7\] prior to Day 0) will determine which Participants meet all-but-one eligibility criteria, which are assessed by an adjudication procedure, followed by completion of a 7-day eDiary prior to Day 0. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion and in a 1:1 ratio on Day 0 to either Engensis or Placebo. During Screening, medical history and familial cancer history, demographics, vital signs, height, body mass index, waist size, physical examination, retinal fundoscopy (by an ophthalmologist), 12-lead electrocardiogram, ultrasound of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles (to guide Study Injections), laboratory assessments, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hemoglobin A1c levels, viral screening, a record of all concomitant medications and procedures, urine drug analysis, and urine pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential will be conducted. In addition, the following procedures will be conducted during Screening: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Accurate Pain Reporting and Placebo Response Reduction, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, and cancer screening tests. During 7 days before Day 0 and randomization, Participants must complete the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy on an eDiary for determining the Average Daily Pain Scores for at least 5 out of the 7 days. Adverse event assessments will start upon completion of the consent process at the start of Screening. At any time prior to dosing on Day 0, Bedside Sensory Testing should be administered. Following randomization, and prior to the first intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo on Day 0, the partial Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, , and quality of life instruments will be completed. Blood will be collected for testing of selected cytokines, anti-Hepatic growth factor antibodies, and laboratory assessments. All Participants will receive sixteen (16) 0.5-mL intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo in each calf gastrocnemius muscle at each of two Visits during two Treatment Cycles: Treatment Cycle 1 on Day 0 and Day 14, and Treatment Cycle 2 on Day 90 and Day 104. At 2 hours (± 1 hour) after completion of intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo on Days 0 and 14 and Days 90 and 104, vital signs and blood draw for cytokine levels will be performed. Treatment-emergent adverse event assessment, including injection site reactions, will start as of randomization (Day 0) and continue throughout the study. Follow-up Study Visits will be conducted on Days 28, 60, 150, and 180 or early termination. Vital signs will be recorded at all Study Visits. At the Day 180 Visit (end of study), the following assessments will be conducted: the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (performed for 7 days prior to the Day 180 Visit), Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Bedside Sensory Testing, Patient Global Impression of Change and the quality of life assessments (36-item Short Form Health Survey and European Quality of Life Health Utilities Index, urine drug analysis, retinal fundoscopy, physical examination, concomitant medications and procedures, and anti-Hepatic Growth Factors antibodies. Blood will be drawn for determination of serum chemistry, lipid profile, pregnancy status, hematology, and Hemoglobin A1c levels. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Engensis compared to Placebo as measured by changes in the means of the Average Daily Pain Scores of the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, selected blood cytokines, Bedside sensory testing, and assessments of injection site reactions, physical examination, laboratory assessments, vital signs, treatment emergent Adverse events, and serious adverse events. Study and Treatment Duration: Screening will occur up to 52 days prior to Baseline (Day 0) and Participants will be followed from Day 0, the day of first Study Injections, to Day 180/Early termination. Visit Frequency: Consented Participants will be seen and evaluated for enrollment during Screening (up to 52 days prior to Baseline, Day 0). There are 8 visits to the Clinical Site during the study from Day 0 to Day 180 for Study Injections and follow-up. Intervention Groups and Duration: Two treatment groups of Participants (Engensis or Placebo) will be in the study for 180 days. Number of Participants (N = 152 to approximately 250): The target sample size is a minimum of 152 Participants and the maximum sample size is 250 Participants based on the proposed adaptive design analysis. The final sample size of Participants to be enrolled and evaluated will be determined by the independent Data Monitoring Committee. An interim analysis will be conducted after approximately 50% of Participants in the target sample (i.e., 76 Participants) have completed the primary efficacy endpoint at Day 180 or have withdrawn prematurely. The Data monitoring committee will make a recommendation based on an unblinded (comparative) power analysis.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEngensis

Intramuscular injections

OTHERPlacebo

Intramuscular injections

Sponsors

Helixmith Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female participants age ≥ 18 years at time of completion of the informed consent process 2. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and on current Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2020 optimal guideline-directed medical therapy in participants (including vaccine recommendations if possible), and without unstable diabetes or significant medical problems, such as progressive end-organ disease, within 3 months of or during Screening, in the judgment of the Investigator 3. Glycosylated HbA1c of ≤ 10.0% using the first assessment collected during Screening 4. Documented diagnosis of bilateral painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both lower extremities at least 6 months prior to Screening 5. An Average Daily Pain Score ≥ 4 (standard deviation ≥ 0.3 and ≤ 1.5) that was completed during the 7 days prior to randomization (Day 0) 6. The physical examination component of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score of ≥ 2.5 7. If on medication for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (other than gabapentin or pregabalin), must have been on a stable dose defined as \< 50% change in total dose over 3 months prior to completion of informed consent 8. Male participants and their female partners had to agree to use double-barrier contraception during the study or provide proof of postmenopausal state (minimum 1 year) or surgical sterility 9. Male participants were not to donate sperm during the study 10. Female participants had to be nonpregnant, nonlactating, and either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile for at least 3 months, or agreed to use double-barrier contraception from 28 days prior to randomization and/or their last confirmed menstrual period prior to study randomization (whichever is longer) until the end of the study 11. Capable and willing to comply with the requirements and restrictions of the protocol and informed consent form 12. Able to complete all screening activities within 52 days of signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Other sources of pain that prevented accurate assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain (e.g., thoracic and/or lumbar root proximal neuropathy, mononeuritis multiplex) 2. Peripheral neuropathy caused by a condition other than diabetes: e.g., anatomic (sciatic nerve compression), systemic (monoclonal gammopathy), metabolic (thyroid disease), and toxic (alcohol use) neuropathies 3. Had taken gabapentin or pregabalin during 30 days before completion of informed consent process or was going to take at any time during the study 4. Progressive or degenerative neurological disorder, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, multiple sclerosis, or other neurological disorders determined by the Investigator to preclude participation 5. Symptomatic peripheral artery disease or peripheral artery disease requiring revascularization and/or that may interfere with the conduct of the study 6. Vasculitis, such as from Buerger's or other diseases 7. Systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg on tolerable doses of standard antihypertensive medications at Screening determined by the Investigator to preclude participation 8. Hyperlipidemia or dyslipidemia not being treated with an optimal treatment regimen that follows the Standards of Care for hyperlipidemic/dyslipidemic patients with DM 9. Class 3 or 4 heart failure 10. Symptomatic bradycardia or untreated high degree atrioventricular block 11. Stroke or cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months before Screening 12. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula based on Cystatin C levels 13. Progressive renal dysfunction, defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate to chronic kidney disease Stage 1, 2, or 3 in the past 6 months before Screening 14. Ophthalmologic conditions pertinent to signs or symptoms of proliferative diabetic retinopathy or other ocular conditions that precluded standard ophthalmologic examination 15. Myopathy (e.g., Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy, polymyositis) 16. Any prior or planned lower extremity amputation (excluding toe amputations) due to diabetic complications or prior lower leg injury (e.g., scarring, muscle atrophy) in the calf area (gastrocnemius) that would significantly reduce the surface area of the skin or amount of intact skeletal muscle required for the 16 treatment injections of Engensis 17. Active infection requiring antimicrobial agent(s) (chronic infection or severe active infection that may compromise the Participant's well-being or participation in the study, in the Investigator's judgment) 18. Chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disease (e.g., Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis) 19. Immunosuppression due to underlying disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus) or to currently receiving immunosuppressive drugs, (e.g., chemotherapy, corticosteroids) or to radiation therapy 20. Participants requiring chronic oral or injectable steroids and unwilling to refrain from taking these drugs for the duration of the study 21. Participants with a family medical history of 2 or more first-degree relatives (parent, sibling, child) diagnosed to have the same type of cancer - breast cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer, endometrial cancer, lung cancer, or prostate cancer; or with a family medical history of Lynch Syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) in any first-degree relative; or who show positive results during cancer screening 22. Positive human immunodeficiency virus or human T-cell lymphotropic virus I/II test at Screening 23. Participants with cancer who have not been cancer-free for ≥5 years with the following exceptions (not excluded): Participants with in-situ basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma 24. Participants with a prior history of stem cell transplant for cancer no matter how long they have been cancer-free 25. Active acute or chronic hepatitis B 26. Active hepatitis C 27. Clinically significant laboratory values or current medical conditions during Screening that, in the judgment of the Investigator, should be exclusionary 28. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score of ≥ 15 on either subscale 29. History of drug abuse (the habitual taking of addictive or illegal drugs) in the past 3 months and positive for Drugs of Abuse, with the exception of cannabis, during Screening 30. Participants unwilling to discontinue their use of the following during Screening at least 7 days before starting eDiary entries and not use any of the following during the study: * skeletal muscle relaxants * opioids * transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (tens) * acupuncture * benzodiazepines (other than stable bedtime dose) * injectable or oral steroids 31. Participants not on a stable dose and not willing to remain on a stable dose during study for the following drugs: * antidepressants * antiepileptics * duloxetine 32. Participants using the following medications and unwilling to discontinue topical use on the lower legs and feet and throughout the study: * capsaicin * anesthetic creams (except during Study Injections) * anesthetic patches * isosorbide dinitrate spray 33. Use of an investigational drug or treatment in past 30 days or previous participation in a clinical study with Engensis 34. Body mass index ≥ 42 kg/m2 35. Recent treatment for COVID-19 with ongoing sequelae

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy180 days• The Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Change in Baseline to Day 180. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Average Daily Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population). Overall Engensis n=79.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo180 days• The Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Worst Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population).
Efficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy180 days• The Average Daily Pain Score from the Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of Responders with ≥50% Reduction from Baseline in the Average Daily Pain Score on Day 180 (Intent-To-Treat Population).
Safety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to Placebo180 daysTo evaluate the safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis in Participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs as compared to Placebo. • Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse event; Incidence of injection site reactions; Incidence of clinically significant laboratory values.
To Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to Engensis104 daysChange from baseline in the TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IFNy, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12p70 cytokine profile post-dose at the Day 104 visit.
To Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDays 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180• Presence of anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies following Engensis administration compared to Placebo \- Anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies will be collected on Day 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180, and the presence will be summarized according to each time point.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Engensis
16 (ea) 0.25mg (0.5 mL) injections in each of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104. Engensis: Intramuscular injections
81
Placebo
16 0.5 mL injections in each of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104. Placebo: Intramuscular injections
81
Total162

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up43
Overall Studymissing10
Overall StudyNot Dosed - 2 subjects misrandomized, included in ITT, but not Safety population.20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEngensisPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
34 Participants30 Participants64 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants51 Participants98 Participants
Age, Continuous62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87
BMI (kg/m^2)32.533 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2182
31.440 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7049
31.987 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.983
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
69 Participants70 Participants139 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
81 participants81 participants162 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants25 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants56 Participants114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 790 / 81
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 7941 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 794 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

• The Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Change in Baseline to Day 180. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Average Daily Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population). Overall Engensis n=79.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180.~81 subjects were randomized to Engensis. Two Engensis subjects were never dosed and were withdrawn from the study on Day 0, therefore do not fall into the safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EngensisEfficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy-2.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboEfficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy-2.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.115
Secondary

Efficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo

• The Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Worst Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Worst Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population).~81 subjects were randomized to Engensis. Two Engensis subjects were never dosed and were withdrawn from the study on Day 0, therefore do not fall into the safety population. Overall Engensis n=79.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EngensisEfficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo-2.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.374
PlaceboEfficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo-3.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.588
Secondary

Efficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

• The Average Daily Pain Score from the Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of Responders with ≥50% Reduction from Baseline in the Average Daily Pain Score on Day 180 (Intent-To-Treat Population).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Responders with ≥50% Reduction from Baseline in the Average Daily Pain Score on Day 180 (Intent-To-Treat Population).~81 subjects were randomized to Engensis. Two Engensis subjects were never dosed and were withdrawn from the study on Day 0, therefore do not fall into the safety population. Overall Engensis n=79.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EngensisEfficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy24 Participants
PlaceboEfficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy33 Participants
Secondary

Safety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to Placebo

To evaluate the safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis in Participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs as compared to Placebo. • Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse event; Incidence of injection site reactions; Incidence of clinically significant laboratory values.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Overall Summary of Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety Population) by Severity, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values.~81 subjects were randomized to Engensis, Two Engensis subjects were never dosed and were withdrawn from the study on Day 0, therefore do not fall into the safety population. Overall Engensis n = 79.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboAny Treatment Emergent AE45 Participants
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Mild18 Participants
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Moderate20 Participants
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Severe7 Participants
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboInjection Site Reactions10 Participants
EngensisSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboClinically Significant Lab Values - Any Abnormal Analyte Value of Interest29 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboInjection Site Reactions9 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboAny Treatment Emergent AE44 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Severe3 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Mild24 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboClinically Significant Lab Values - Any Abnormal Analyte Value of Interest30 Participants
PlaceboSafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to PlaceboTreatment Emergent AE by Severity - Moderate17 Participants
Secondary

To Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to Engensis

Change from baseline in the TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IFNy, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12p70 cytokine profile post-dose at the Day 104 visit.

Time frame: 104 days

Population: Change from baseline in the TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IFNy, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12 p70 cytokine profile post-dose at the Day 104 visit.~Of the 79 Engensis Subjects that were dosed, 69 had Cytokine Samples collected at both Day 0 and Day 104. Of the 81 Placebo Subjects that were dosed, 77 had Cytokine Samples collected at both Day 0 and Day 104.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-10 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.147 ng/LStandard Deviation 1.2292
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIF-gamma - Change from Baseline Day 104-3.371 ng/LStandard Deviation 27.819
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-12 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisTNF-alpha - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.334 ng/LStandard Deviation 4.5971
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-4 - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.002 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.0157
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-1beta - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.245 ng/LStandard Deviation 2.0345
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-6 - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.262 ng/LStandard Deviation 1.6692
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-1beta - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.001 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.0125
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIF-gamma - Change from Baseline Day 1041.087 ng/LStandard Deviation 5.4897
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-6 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.012 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.6282
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-4 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-10 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.029 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.1439
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisTNF-alpha - Change from Baseline Day 1040.518 ng/LStandard Deviation 1.8213
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to EngensisIL-12 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

To Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth Factor

• Presence of anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies following Engensis administration compared to Placebo \- Anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies will be collected on Day 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180, and the presence will be summarized according to each time point.

Time frame: Days 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180

Population: Safety Population. 81 subjects were randomized to Engensis. Two Engensis subjects were never dosed and were withdrawn from the study on Day 0, therefore do not fall into the safety population. Overall Engensis n=79.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 60 - Anti-HGF Present0 Participants
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 150 - AntiHGF Present0 Participants
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 90 - AntiHGF Present1 Participants
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 180 - AntiHGF Present0 Participants
EngensisTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 0 - Anti-HGF Present0 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 180 - AntiHGF Present0 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 0 - Anti-HGF Present0 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 60 - Anti-HGF Present0 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 90 - AntiHGF Present0 Participants
PlaceboTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth FactorDay 150 - AntiHGF Present1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026