Skip to content

Opaganib, a Sphingosine Kinase-2 (SK2) Inhibitor in COVID-19 Pneumonia

Opaganib, a Sphingosine Kinase-2 (SK2) Inhibitor in COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2/3 Study, in Adult Subjects Hospitalized With Severe SARS-CoV-2 Positive Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04467840
Enrollment
475
Registered
2020-07-13
Start date
2020-08-21
Completion date
2021-07-18
Last updated
2025-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19, Lung Infection

Keywords

Therapeutic Use

Brief summary

A phase 2/3 multi-center randomized, double-blind, parallel arm, placebo- controlled study in Adult Subjects Hospitalized with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Positive Pneumonia to determine the potential of opaganib to improve and/or stabilize the clinical status of the patient.

Detailed description

This is a phase 2/3 multi-center randomized, double-blind, parallel arm, placebo- controlled study with an adaptive design that will utilize a futility assessment. The study is planned be performed worldwide in up to approximately 80 clinical sites. After informed consent is obtained, patients will enter a screening phase for no more than 3 days, to determine eligibility. Approximately 464 eligible patients will be randomized and receive either opaganib added to standard of care, or matching placebo added to standard of care, in a randomization ratio of 1:1. Treatment assignments will remain blinded to the patient, investigator and hospital staff, as well as the sponsor. As the approval and/or guidance for treating COVID-19 are evolving, for this protocol, standard of care will be defined by the recommended schemes of treatment according to the severity of the disease, taking into consideration regulatory approvals in one or more regions. Study participants will receive either opaganib 2 x 250 mg capsules (500 mg) every 12 hours, or matching placebo, in addition to standard of care (pharmacological as defined above and/or supportive) at any given institution. Study drug will be administered every day for 14 days (Day 1 to Day 14). All participants will be followed up for 28 days after their last dose of study drug, which may occur at Day 14 or after premature study drug discontinuation, based upon patient or physician determination.

Interventions

Study participants will receive either opaganib 2 x 250 mg capsules (500 mg) every 12 hours, or matching placebo, in addition to standard of care (pharmacological as defined above and/or supportive) at any given institution. Study drug will be administered every day for 14 days (Day 1 to Day 14).

DRUGPlacebo

Study participants will receive either opaganib 2 x 250 mg capsules (500 mg) every 12 hours, or matching placebo, in addition to standard of care (pharmacological as defined above and/or supportive) at any given institution. Study drug will be administered every day for 14 days (Day 1 to Day 14).

Sponsors

RedHill Biopharma Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult male or female ≥18 to ≤80 years of age 2. Proven COVID-19 infection per RT-PCR assay of a pharyngeal sample (nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal) AND pneumonia defined as radiographic opacities on chest X-ray or CT scan. that diagnosed COVID-19 pneumonia. Pharyngeal samples collected either at screening or within 7-days prior to screening for the same ongoing COVID-19 pneumonia illness are acceptable 3. The patient requires, at baseline, high flow supplemental oxygen or positive pressure ventilation or is receiving oxygen via face mask, such as a non-rebreather or reservoir mask, capable of delivering high concentrations of oxygen 4. Patient agrees to use appropriate methods of contraception during the study and 3 months after the last dose of study drug 5. The patient or legal representative has signed a written informed consent approved by the IRB/Ethics Committee

Exclusion criteria

1. Any co-morbidity that may add risk to the treatment in the judgment of the investigator, particularly patients with known cardiac conditions, and serious neuropsychiatric conditions such as psychosis or major depression 2. Requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation at baseline 3. Patient has a 'Do Not Intubate' and/or 'Do Not Resuscitate' order in place 4. Oxygen saturation \>95% on room air 5. Any preexisting respiratory condition that requires intermittent or continuous ambulatory oxygen prior to hospitalization 6. Patient is, in the investigator's clinical judgement, unlikely to survive \>72 hours 7. Pregnant (positive serum or urine test within 3 days prior to randomization) or nursing women . 8. Unwillingness or inability to comply with procedures required in this protocol. 9. Corrected QT (QTc) interval on electrocardiogram (ECG) \>470 ms for females or \>450 ms for males, calculated using Friedericia's formula (QTcF) 10. AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) \> 2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) 11. Total bilirubin \>1.5x ULN (except where bilirubin increase is due to Gilbert's Syndrome) 12. Serum creatinine \>2.0 X ULN 13. Absolute neutrophil count \<1000 cells/mm3 14. Platelet count \<75,000/mm3 15. Hemoglobin \<8.0 g/dL 16. Medications that are sensitive substrates, or substrates with a narrow therapeutic range, for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 CYP2D6 , CYP3A4, P-gP, BCRP and OATP1B1 should be avoided with opaganib 17. Moderate or strong inhibitors of CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2D6 or P-gP or moderate to strong inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 are prohibited 18. Currently taking warfarin, apixaban, argatroban or rivaroxaban due to drug-drug interaction based on CYP450 metabolism 19. Current drug or alcohol abuse 20. Currently participating in a clinical study assessing pharmacological treatments, including anti-viral studies 21. Treatment with any medication that causes QT prolongation within seven days, or 5 half-lives, whichever is longest, prior to initiation of study drug, or intention to use them throughout the study, including but not limited to: amiodarone, amitriptyline, citalopram dose greater than 20 mg/day, dihydroergotamine, disopyramide, dofetilide, dronedarone, ergotamine, ibutilde, ondansetron or other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, pimozide, procainamide, quinidine, quinine, quinolone, ranolazine, risperidone, sotaloland tolteridine. Investigators are directed to the following up-to-date web site listing QT prolonging drugs: https://www.crediblemeds.org/index.php/drugsearch

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Supplemental Oxygen Requirement14 days maintained up to 42 daysTo compare the proportion of patients no longer requiring supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 4214 days maintained up to 42 daysCompare ≥2 category improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement from 0(uninfected) to 8(death) for subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. Success was defined as subject who reached improvement of at least two points on the WHO Ordinal Scale by Day 14, maintained by the end of study visit, and failure otherwise.
Number of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement With a Scale Ranging From 8 Down to 014 days maintained up to 42 daysCompare scores of subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement to determine time to recovery as defined by improvement to a score of 3 or less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement with a scale ranging from 0 (uninfected) to 8 (death)
Number of Participants With Low Oxygen Flow Via Nasal Cannula14 days maintained up to 42 daysTo compare the time to low oxygen flow via nasal cannula e.g. from high oxygen flow via nasal cannula or CPAP, if high oxygen flow is not an available option between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.
Time to Discharge From Hospital Measured at 14 Days14 daysTime to subject discharge from hospital
Number of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 1414 daysTo compare the number of patients with two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.
Patients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 1414 daysTo compare the proportion of patients with two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.
Mortality Due to Any Cause28 daysTo compare mortality 28 days post-baseline between subjects taking opaganib and those taking placebo
Patients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 4242 daysTo compare the proportion of patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose until 4 weeks follow-up after the end of treatmentTo compare the number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia between participants taking opaganib and participants taking placebo

Countries

Brazil, Colombia, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Opaganib
Opaganib administered orally in 2 x 250 mg capsules (500 mg) every 12 hours every day for 14 days (Day 1 to Day 14) in addition to standard of care. When required this may be made into a suspension form and may be administered by nasogastric tube.
237
Placebo
Matching placebo administered orally in 2 x 250 mg capsules (500 mg) every 12 hours every day for 14 days (Day 1 to Day 14) in addition to standard of care. Where required this may be made into a suspension form and may be administered by nasogastric tube.
238
Total475

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyDeath3539
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyMissing study completion status31
Overall StudyOther15
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject84

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpaganibPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
48 Participants69 Participants117 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
189 Participants169 Participants358 Participants
Age, Continuous55.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.05
57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.42
BMI at Baseline (kg/m^2)31.02 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.676
30.47 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.158
30.74 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.421
FiO2>60% sub-population inflammation markers: CRP levels94.050 mg/L106.370 mg/L102.800 mg/L
FiO2≤60% sub-population inflammation markers: CRP Levels67.100 mg/L45.00 mg/L60.80 mg/L
FiO2≤60% sub-population inflammation markers: D-Dimer Levels0.499 ug/ml0.380 ug/ml0.450 ug/ml
FiO2>60% sub-population inflammation markers: D-Dimer Levels0.790 ug/ml0.836 ug/ml0.806 ug/ml
FiO2≤60% sub-population inflammation markers: Ferritin Levels727.600 ug/L592.300 ug/L666.950 ug/L
FiO2>60% sub-population inflammation markers: Ferritin Levels1074.150 ug/L980.00 ug/L1000.00 ug/L
FiO2≤60% sub-population inflammation markers: Lactate Dehydrogenase359.400 IU/L368.750 IU/L361.150 IU/L
FiO2>60% sub-population inflammation markers: Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels477.500 IU/L447.00 IU/L469.230 IU/L
FiO2≤60% sub-population inflammation markers: lymphocyte counts0.910 10^9*cell/L1.010 10^9*cell/L0.990 10^9*cell/L
FiO2>60% sub-population lymphocyte counts0.840 10^9*cell/L0.700 10^9*cell/L0.792 10^9*cell/L
HbA1c at Screening
<6.5 and not on active treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemics
154 Participants157 Participants311 Participants
HbA1c at Screening
≥6.5 or on active treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemics
83 Participants80 Participants163 Participants
HbA1c at Screening
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Median percentage of oxygen in the gas mix (%)60.0 Percentage of oxygen60.0 Percentage of oxygen60.0 Percentage of oxygen
Oxygen flow at baseline (L/min)24.6 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.59
24.9 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.83
24.8 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.69
Oxygen in the gas mix (%)65.5 Percentage of oxygen
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60
64.1 Percentage of oxygen
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60
64.8 Percentage of oxygen
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60
Oxygen type (for supplemental oxygen at baseline - Yes)
Intubation/Mechanical ventilation
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Oxygen type (for supplemental oxygen at baseline - Yes)
Low Flow Nasal Cannulas (LFNC)
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Oxygen type (for supplemental oxygen at baseline - Yes)
Non-invasive ventilation/High Flow Nasal Cannulas (HFNC)/Mask with reservoir/Mask without reservoir
225 Participants230 Participants455 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
23 Participants18 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
197 Participants203 Participants400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
61 participants62 participants123 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
10 participants8 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
43 participants40 participants83 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
25 participants28 participants53 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
12 participants16 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
79 participants80 participants159 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
86 Participants76 Participants162 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants162 Participants313 Participants
Supplemental Oxygen at Baseline
Missing
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Supplemental Oxygen at Baseline
No
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Supplemental Oxygen at Baseline
Yes
229 Participants233 Participants462 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
44 / 23047 / 233
other
Total, other adverse events
155 / 230147 / 233
serious
Total, serious adverse events
52 / 23052 / 233

Outcome results

Primary

Supplemental Oxygen Requirement

To compare the proportion of patients no longer requiring supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days

Population: Modified ITT (mITT) population defined as randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen RequirementSubjects not receiving supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 14 and maintained at Day 42139 Participants
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen RequirementSubjects receiving supplemental oxygen (including: death, lost to follow-up, or need of oxygen)91 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen RequirementSubjects not receiving supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 14 and maintained at Day 42132 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen RequirementSubjects receiving supplemental oxygen (including: death, lost to follow-up, or need of oxygen)101 Participants
p-value: 0.39195% CI: [-4.93, 12.65]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Mortality Due to Any Cause

To compare mortality 42 days post-baseline between subjects taking opaganib and those taking placebo

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Mortality (failure) was assessed by treatment Day 42 (including). Any early termination/ missing survival status at the end of study visit was also regarded as failure for the primary analysis of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibMortality Due to Any CauseYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause at Day 4244 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any CauseNo (Success)186 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any CauseYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause at Day 4247 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any CauseNo (Success)186 Participants
Secondary

Mortality Due to Any Cause

To compare mortality 28 days post-baseline between subjects taking opaganib and those taking placebo

Time frame: 28 days

Population: Mortality (failure) was assessed by treatment Day 28 (including). Any early termination/ missing survival status at the end of study visit was also regarded as failure for the primary analysis of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibMortality Due to Any CauseNo (Success)192 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any CauseYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause at Day 2838 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any CauseNo (Success)189 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any CauseYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause at Day 2844 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Low Oxygen Flow Via Nasal Cannula

To compare the time to low oxygen flow via nasal cannula e.g. from high oxygen flow via nasal cannula or CPAP, if high oxygen flow is not an available option between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days

Population: mITT. In this analysis, subjects who required low-flow supplemental oxygen at Day 1 (baseline) were considered success events, and the time to event of interest for these subjects was defined as 0.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Participants With Low Oxygen Flow Via Nasal Cannula169 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Low Oxygen Flow Via Nasal Cannula167 Participants
p-value: 0.47295% CI: [0.87, 1.33]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14

To compare the number of patients with two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: Only subjects who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at the screening visit were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Number of participants93 participants
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Number of censored participants (observations)125 participants
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with no post baseline results available13 participants
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with less than two results and discharged by Day 57 participants
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with less than two results and not discharged by Day 521 participants
OpaganibNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with at least two results which are not two sequential negatives84 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with less than two results and discharged by Day 57 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Number of participants79 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with less than two results and not discharged by Day 524 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Number of censored participants (observations)140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with at least two results which are not two sequential negatives101 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Two Consecutive Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with no post baseline results available8 participants
p-value: 0.04395% CI: [0.99, 1.82]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement With a Scale Ranging From 8 Down to 0

Compare scores of subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement to determine time to recovery as defined by improvement to a score of 3 or less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement with a scale ranging from 0 (uninfected) to 8 (death)

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days

Population: mITT population presenting subjects who experienced a recovery event by Day 14 maintained up to day 42

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement With a Scale Ranging From 8 Down to 0145 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement With a Scale Ranging From 8 Down to 0138 Participants
p-value: 0.23195% CI: [0.91, 1.45]Log Rank
Secondary

Patients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42

To compare the proportion of patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Subjects requiring intubation by Day 42

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Death without intubation3 Participants
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Intubation without death10 Participants
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Intubation with death33 Participants
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)7 Participants
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Subjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)53 Participants
OpaganibPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Subjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)177 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Intubation with death33 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Subjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)57 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Intubation without death10 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Death without intubation5 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Subjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)176 Participants
PlaceboPatients Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42Type of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)9 Participants
p-value: 0.70195% CI: [-9.19, 6.18]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Patients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14

To compare the proportion of patients with two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: Only subjects who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at the screening visit AND had at least two post baseline PCR tests were analyzed.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibPatients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants without two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 (Failure)93 Participants
OpaganibPatients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with at least two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 (Success)84 Participants
PlaceboPatients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants without two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 (Failure)79 Participants
PlaceboPatients With Negative Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 at Day 14Participants with at least two consecutive negative swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at Day 14 (Success)101 Participants
p-value: 0.11895% CI: [-2.05, 18.65]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42

Compare ≥2 category improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement from 0(uninfected) to 8(death) for subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. Success was defined as subject who reached improvement of at least two points on the WHO Ordinal Scale by Day 14, maintained by the end of study visit, and failure otherwise.

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Subject has improvement of 1 or none on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) Day 14 up to Day 4285 Participants
OpaganibPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)18 Participants
OpaganibPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1464 Participants
OpaganibPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success3 Participants
OpaganibPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Subject has improvement > or equal to 2 on the WHO Ordinal Scale Day 14 and up to to Day 42145 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success5 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Subject has improvement > or equal to 2 on the WHO Ordinal Scale Day 14 and up to to Day 42138 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Subject has improvement of 1 or none on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) Day 14 up to Day 4295 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1469 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42Failure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)21 Participants
p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-4.78, 12.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time to Discharge From Hospital Measured at 14 Days

Time to subject discharge from hospital

Time frame: 14 days

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OpaganibTime to Discharge From Hospital Measured at 14 Days13.50 Days
PlaceboTime to Discharge From Hospital Measured at 14 Days14.00 Days
p-value: 0.52195% CI: [0.846, 1.378]Log Rank
Post Hoc

Mortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% Population

To compare mortality 28 and 42 days post-baseline between subjects taking opaganib and those taking placebo in the in the FiO2 ≤60% population

Time frame: 28 and 42 days

Population: Mortality (failure) was assessed by treatment Day 28 (including) and Day 42. Any early termination/ missing survival status at the end of study visit was also regarded as failure for the primary analysis of this endpoint.~For the FiO2 ≤60% Sub-population

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause7 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationNo (Success)110 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause7 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationNo (Success)110 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationNo (Success)113 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause21 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationYes (Failure) - Mortality due to any cause21 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 ≤60% populationNo (Success)113 Participants
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-16.63, -1.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Mortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% Population

To compare mortality 28 and 42 days post-baseline between subjects taking opaganib and those taking placebo in the in the FiO2 \> 60% population

Time frame: 28 and 42 days

Population: Mortality (failure) was assessed by treatment Day 28 (including) and Day 42. Any early termination/ missing survival status at the end of study visit was also regarded as failure for the primary analysis of this endpoint.~For the FiO2 \> 60% Sub-population

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% populationNo (Success)69 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 > 60% populationNo (Success)75 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 > 60% populationYes (Failure)30 Participants
OpaganibMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% populationYes (Failure)36 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 > 60% populationYes (Failure)21 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% populationNo (Success)64 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% populationYes (Failure)24 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Any Cause in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationMortality due to any cause at Day 28 in the FiO2 > 60% populationNo (Success)67 Participants
p-value: 0.27395% CI: [-5.66, 20.39]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

To compare the number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia between participants taking opaganib and participants taking placebo

Time frame: From first dose until 4 weeks follow-up after the end of treatment

Population: TEAE=Treatment emergent adverse event. Treatment emergent events are events that started on or after the date of first dose

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)155 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)147 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 ≤60% Population

Subjects discharged from the hospital in the FiO2 ≤60% population at 14 days

Time frame: 14 days

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 ≤60% Population81 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 ≤60% Population85 Participants
p-value: 0.195% CI: [0.94, 1.732]Log Rank
Post Hoc

Number of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 > 60% Population

Number of subjects discharged from the hospital in the FiO2 \> 60% population

Time frame: 14 days

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 > 60% Population41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Discharged From Hospital in the FiO2 > 60% Population40 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 ≤60% Population

Compare scores of subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement with a scale ranging from 8 down to 0 with a higher score indicating a poorer clinical status

Time frame: 14 days

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 ≤60% Population93 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 ≤60% Population88 Participants
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [1.07, 1.93]Log Rank
Post Hoc

Number of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 > 60% Population

Compare scores of subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. World Health Organization Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement with a scale ranging from 8 down to 0 with a higher score indicating poorer clincal status

Time frame: 14 days

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 > 60% Population46 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Improvement to a Score of 3 or Less on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement in the FiO2 > 60% Population43 Participants
p-value: 0.54595% CI: [0.58, 1.34]Log Rank
Post Hoc

Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% Population

To compare the proportion of patients in the FiO2 ≤60% sub-population requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Subjects requiring intubation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% sub-population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)1 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationSubjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)109 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation with death5 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation without death2 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Death without intubation0 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationSubjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)8 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Death without intubation1 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationSubjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)110 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation without death3 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)5 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationSubjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)24 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation with death15 Participants
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-18.44, -2.57]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% Population

To compare the proportion of patients in the FiO2 \> 60% sub-population requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation between subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo.

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Subjects requiring intubation by Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤60% sub-population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)43 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)62 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation without death7 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation with death28 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Death without intubation3 Participants
OpaganibRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)5 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Death without intubation4 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubjects requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Failure)30 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation with death16 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubjects not requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation by Day 42 (Success)58 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Early termination/missing data (alive without intubation)4 Participants
PlaceboRequiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation by Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationType of failure: Intubation without death6 Participants
p-value: 0.30495% CI: [-6.46, 20.86]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% Population

Post hoc analysis in the FiO2 ≤ 60% population. Compare ≥2 category improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. Success was defined as subject who reached improvement of at least two points on the WHO Ordinal Scale by Day 14, maintained by the end of study visit day 42, and failure otherwise. WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement is a scale from 0 (uninfected) to 8 (death) with higher scale poorer clinical status

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days or classified as a failure

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 2 or more on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Success) Day 14 maintained to day 4293 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)3 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success at Day 140 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 1 or does not show improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) Day 1424 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1421 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1429 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 2 or more on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Success) Day 14 maintained to day 4288 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 1 or does not show improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) Day 1446 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)13 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 Maintained to Day 42 in the FiO2 ≤ 60% PopulationFailure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success at Day 144 Participants
p-value: 0.02395% CI: [1.9, 23.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Subjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% Population

Post hoc analysis in the FiO2 \> 60% population. Compare ≥2 category improvement on the WHO Clinical Ordinal Scale for subjects taking opaganib and those on placebo, lower scores indicate improvement. Success was defined as subject who reached improvement of at least two points on the WHO Ordinal Scale by Day 14, maintained by the end of study visit day 42 and failure otherwise.WHO Scale 0 to 8 with 8 death and higher number worse clinical state

Time frame: 14 days maintained up to 42 days or classifed as failure

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 2 or more on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Success) Day 14 maintained to Day 4246 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 1 or no improvement shown on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) at Day 1459 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1441 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)15 Participants
OpaganibSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success3 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to missing status at Day 42 with prior success1 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to death up to Day 14 (before any success)7 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 1 or no improvement shown on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Failure) at Day 1445 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationSubject has improvement of 2 or more on the WHO Ordinal Scale (Success) Day 14 maintained to Day 4243 Participants
PlaceboSubjects With ≥ 2 Category Improvement on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement by Day 14 up to Day 42 in the FiO2 > 60% PopulationFailure due to not achieving improvement at Day 1437 Participants
p-value: 0.56195% CI: [-18.07, 9.82]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Supplemental Oxygen Requirement in the ≤60% FiO2 Sub-population

Percentage of Subjects No Longer Requiring Supplemental Oxygen, for at Least 24 Hours by Day 14 in the ≤60% FiO2 FiO2 Sub-populations

Time frame: Day 14

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the ≤60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects no longer requiring oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 1490 Participants
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the ≤60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects requiring oxygen (including death, lost to follow-up or need of oxygen)27 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the ≤60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects no longer requiring oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 1485 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the ≤60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects requiring oxygen (including death, lost to follow-up or need of oxygen)49 Participants
p-value: 0.03395% CI: [1.06, 23.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Supplemental Oxygen Requirement in the > 60% FiO2 Sub-population

Percentage of Subjects No Longer Requiring Supplemental Oxygen, for at Least 24 Hours by Day 14 in the \> 60% FiO2 FiO2 Sub-populations

Time frame: Day 14

Population: A post hoc analysis set comprised two sub-populations, namely, lower FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline ≤ the median of 60%) and higher FiO2 (FiO2 at baseline \> the median of 60%) was added after the final version of the SAP was signed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the > 60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects no longer requiring oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 1443 Participants
OpaganibSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the > 60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects requiring oxygen (including death, lost to follow-up or need of oxygen)62 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the > 60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects no longer requiring oxygen for at least 24 hours by Day 1441 Participants
PlaceboSupplemental Oxygen Requirement in the > 60% FiO2 Sub-populationSubjects requiring oxygen (including death, lost to follow-up or need of oxygen)47 Participants
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-18.67, 9.17]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026