Skip to content

Comparison of Spectral Photon Counting CT (SPCCT) With Dual Energy CT (DECT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Plaque and Lumen Carotid Arteries Evaluation

Comparison of Spectral Photon Counting CT (SPCCT) With Dual Energy CT (DECT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Plaque and Lumen Carotid Arteries Evaluation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04466787
Acronym
CAPL
Enrollment
22
Registered
2020-07-10
Start date
2019-06-20
Completion date
2021-11-24
Last updated
2024-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supra-Aortic Stenosis

Keywords

diagnostic, carotid plaque, SPCCT

Brief summary

In this study, the investigator propose to determine the efficiency of a new and more sophisticated imaging prototype, the Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography (SPCCT), at characterizing vulnerable plaques and luminal stenosis in Carotid Atherosclerosis patients compared to DECT (Dual Energy CT) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) which are used in current practice

Interventions

The acquisition for the assessment of the brain parenchyma and for the evaluation of the cervical and intracranial arteries will be performed without and with iodine based contrast media, respectively. The same parameters will be used for both conditions but for a large volume, from the aortic arch to the top of the head. The iodinate contrast agent's injection (Iomeron 400, Bracco Imaging France) will be performed at 5mL/s into an 18G catheter, followed by a 20 mL saline flush that will be injected at the same rate. The bolus volume will be determined according to the patient's body weight : 70 mL for patients \< 80 kg and 1 mL/kg for patients \> 80 kg, with a maximum of 90 mL. The SPCCT scanner is a prototype spectral photon-counting computed tomography system derived from a modified clinical CT system with a field of View (FOV) of 168 mm in-plane, and a z-coverage of 2 mm.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDual Energy CT (DECT)

The acquisition for the assessment of the brain parenchyma and for the evaluation of the cervical and intracranial arteries will be performed without and with iodine based contrast media, respectively. The same parameters will be used for both conditions but for a large volume, from the aortic arch to the top of the head. The iodinate contrast agent's injection (Iomeron 400, Bracco Imaging France) will be performed at 5mL/s into an 18G catheter, followed by a 20 mL saline flush that will be injected at the same rate. The bolus volume will be determined according to the patient's body weight : 70 mL for patients \< 80 kg and 1 mL/kg for patients \> 80 kg, with a maximum of 90 mL. DECT : IQon, Philips

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The images will be read without knowing the CT scan used

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects of any ethnic background, aged \> 18 years * Any of the following known or suspected supra-aortic arterial disease based on : Prior stroke; Transient Ischemic Attack; Amaurosis Fugax; Referred for evaluation of any supra-aortic vessel; Follow-up for a stent in a supra-aortic vessel; Prior imaging ultrasounds study showing \> ou = 50 % stenosis of a supra-aortic vessel segment (within 60 days before consent) * Patient undergoing surgery within one month of carotid plaque evaluation * Willingness and ability to follow directions and complete all study procedures specified in the protocol * Pre-menopausal women only : Negative urinary pregnancy test on the day of imaging before the administration of study drug * Patient has accepted to participate to the study and has signed the written consent * Patient is affiliated to social security

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to MRI examinations (e.g. inability to hold breath, severe arrhythmias, very low cardiac output, severe claustrophobia, metallic devices not approved for MRI such as defibrillators, pacemaker, heart valve prostheses, cochlear implants, neuro-stimulators, implanted automated injection device, intraocular metallic foreign bodies, neurosurgical and vascular clips); * Contraindication to the use of iodine and gadolinium containing contrast media (including subjects with suspicion for/or known to have NSF);- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents (as judged by the investigator, taking into account the intensity of the event); * Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) value \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 derived from a serum creatinine result within 1 month before the imaging; * Any subject on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (Note: If there are multiple creatinine values, the values obtained prior to and closest to the time of the examination should be used); * Acute renal insufficiency of any intensity, either due to hepato-renal syndrome or occurring in the per-operative liver transplantation period; * Known subject history of severe cardiovascular disease (e.g. acute myocardial infarction \[\< 14 days\], unstable angina, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class IV) or known long QT syndrome; * Suspected clinical instability or unpredictability of the clinical course during the study period (e.g. due to previous surgery); * Scheduled or potentially expected for the period between the SPCCT or DECT and MRI: Any procedure that may alter the MRI or CT interpretation; Any interventional or surgical procedure involving the supra-aortic vessels. * Pregnant or nursing (including pumping for storage and feeding); 11. Patient under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lipid Necrotic Core (LNC) in mm² identified with SPCCT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Lipid Necrotic Core (LNC) in mm² identified with DECT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Lipid Necrotic Core (LNC) in mm² identified with histology1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Intra Plaque Hemorrhage (IPH) in mm² identified with SPCCT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Intra Plaque Hemorrhage (IPH) in mm² identified with DECT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Intra Plaque Hemorrhage (IPH) identified with histology1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Fibrous Cap Ulceration (FCU) in mm² identified with SPCCT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Fibrous Cap Ulceration (FCU) in mm² identified with DECT1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components
Fibrous Cap Ulceration (FCU) in mm² identified with histology1 monthmeasurement of the height and thickness of surface of the plaque's components

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance to SPCCT assessed by a tolerance survey1 month1 to 10, 1= very bad, 10= very good. Survey adapted from Sparrow et al., Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 19:410-416, 2004
Number of irregularities identified with SPCCT1 month\- Irregularities as defined by \< 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Tolerance to MRI assessed by a tolerance survey1 month1 to 10, 1= very bad, 10= very good. Survey adapted from Sparrow et al., Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 19:410-416, 2004
Tolerance to DECT assessed by a tolerance survey1 month1 to 10, 1= very bad, 10= very good. Survey adapted from Sparrow et al., Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 19:410-416, 2004
Number of irregularities identified with DECT1 month\- Irregularities as defined by \< 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Number of irregularities identified with MRI1 month\- Irregularities as defined by \< 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Number of ulcerations identified with SPCCT1 month\- Ulceration as defined by \> 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Number of ulcerations identified with DECT1 month\- Ulceration as defined by \> 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Number of ulcerations identified with MRI1 month\- Ulceration as defined by \> 2 mm indentation, fissure, or erosion on the luminal surface of a plaque, exposing a portion of the inner plaque to direct contact with circulating blood.
Assessable vascular segments with lack of image artifacts1 monthIt will be assessed by estimating the image quality on scale from 1 to 4 (1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent)
radiation dose received during SPCCT1 month
radiation dose received during DECT1 month

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026