Skip to content

Comparison of Two ECG Guided PICC Insertion Techniques

Comparison of Two ECG Guided PICC Insertion Techniques, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04466332
Enrollment
320
Registered
2020-07-10
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2021-08-20
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Venous Access, Chemotherapy, Long Term Antibiotics, Total Parenteral Nutrition

Keywords

PICC, ECG guidance, Central Venous Catheter, Catheterization

Brief summary

The aim of our study is to compare two ECG techniques for guiding Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Cather (PICC) in terms of accuracy of the final position of the catheter tip.

Detailed description

One technique uses ECG signal transmission with saline water and allows external catheter length adjustment while the other technique uses a guidewire for signal transmission thus requiring prior catheter length adjustment

Interventions

DEVICELifeCath-CT PICC easy™ (Vygon)

ECG electrodes are placed on patient's chest ensuring that there is a distinguishable P-wave. Upper arm selection is based on vein diameter and dominance, ultrasound is used to identify a suitable vein. The patient is prepared using a maximal sterile barrier approach. The catheter is inserted into one of the veins (75-90° arm abduction) using ultrasound and modified Seldinger technique. The PICC is advanced into the central circulation and used as an intracavitary electrode (connection with Vygocard2™). Saline water instilled through the catheter ensures conductivity. The ECG is then used until displayed intracavitary P-wave has a maximal height without negative deflexion. Catheter is left at this point (cavo atrial junction). The PICC hub side is then trimmed and the catheter part connected. The PICC is caped with a neutral bidirectional valve. The puncture site is dressed and catheter stabilized. Chest Xray is obtained immediately after insertion to assess the position.

DEVICEPowerPICC-SOLO® (C.R. Bard)

ECG electrodes are placed on patients chest ensuring that there is a distinguishable P-wave. Upper arm selection is based on vein diameter and dominance, ultrasound is used to identify suitable vein. The patient is prepared using a maximal sterile barrier approach. The catheter is inserted into one of the veins (75-90° arm abduction) using ultrasound and modified Seldinger technique. The catheter's free end is cut to the anticipated length using anthropometric measurements (insertion/axillary crease+axillary crease/sternal notch+13cm) and the preloaded magnetic-tipped stylet (serving as intracavitary electrode) is put inside. The PICC is advanced into central veins until intravascular ECG displays a P-wave with maximal height without negative deflexion. Catheter is left at this point (cavo atrial junction). The puncture site is dressed and catheter stabilized. Chest Xray is obtained immediately after insertion to assess position.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Lausanne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form) * Adult \> 18 years * Referred to the interventional radiology department for PICC insertion

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected non-compliance * Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant * Previous enrolment into the current study * Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons * Impairment of the heart rhythm changing the presentation of the P wave (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, severe tachycardia, pacemaker driven rhythm) * Enrolled in conflicting research study * Weight\> 150 kg, technical limit for the fluoroscopy table * Impossibility of obtaining informed consent * Refusal to be informed in the event of a chance discovery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance from catheter tip to cavo-atrial junction (CAJ)At the end of interventionAt the end of intervention tip position is measured on chest fluoroscopic X-ray. Absolute distance in centimeters from tip to CAJ is measured on the image

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of the outgoing catheterAt the end of interventionLength of the outgoing catheter at the entry point near the bend of the elbow in centimeters
Haemostasis timeAt the end of interventionHaemostasis time at the puncture site entry point (0, 1, 3, 5, \>5 minutes)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026