Skip to content

Interest of a Systematic One-year Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET-CT

Interest of a Systematic One-year Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET-CT of Patients in Complete Remission of Malignant Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04464590
Acronym
LYMPHOTEP1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-07-09
Start date
2009-01-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnostic Imaging, Malignant Lymphoma, Relapsed Hodgkin's Disease, Adult, Relapsed Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

aggressive non-hodgkin lymphoma, hodgkin lymphoma, FDG-PET/CT, follow-up, routine surveillance

Brief summary

In the study, we aimed to characterize the role of FDG PET/CT surveillance at 12 months of malignant lymphoma in asymptomatic patients after a first complete remission and to define a rational follow-up strategy.

Detailed description

Most aggressive lymphomas are sensitive to first-line immunochemotherapy and are in first Complete Remission (CR) with initial therapy. CR significantly decreases the risk of recurrence and increases survival. However, a cure is not guaranteed and approximately one third of lymphoma patients have a relapse disease. FDG PET/CT is a valuable noninvasive tool in the evaluation of lymphomas, especially to differentiate viable lymphoma and fibrosis or necrosis in residual mass. The majority of relapses are diagnosed based on clinical symptoms reported by patients. And the role of FDG PET/CT for routine surveillance of patients after treatment is controversial. However, many medical centers use routine follow-up FDG PET/CT in addition to physical examination and laboratory analysis to detect subclinical relapse. Thus, we can imagine a good timing to routine FDG PET/CT when the tumor burden is small in the asymptomatic window. Survival improvement for relapse detected by routine follow-up imaging is not clearly established compared to diagnosis by clinical symptoms. Several studies tried to assess the value of follow-up FDG PET/CT but population, type, timing and duration of surveillance imaging was very heterogeneous.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* first diagnosis of aggressive lymphoma, complete metabolic remission after a first-line of chemotherapy, no relapse in the first year after the end of treatment

Exclusion criteria

* minor patient, pregnant woman, legal protection (legal curatorship / guardianship), absence of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
role of FDG-PET/CT surveillance at 12months of lymphoma in asymptomatic patient in first complete remissionone daydetection rate of relapse at 1 year and at the end of follow-up
performances FDG-PET/CT 1 yearone daysensitivity, sensibility, predictive negative value, predictive positive value, accuracy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival and progression-free survivalone dayas the time from the end of first-line chemotherapy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026