Skip to content

Micronet Covered Stent in in Arterial Locations Beyond the Carotid Bifurcation - FLOW-Guard Study

Prospective Observational Study of Procedures With MicroNet Covered Stent Use to Treat Increased Risk Lesions in Arterial Locations Beyond the Carotid Bifurcation - FLOW-Guard Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04461717
Acronym
FLOW-Guard
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-07-08
Start date
2020-02-27
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Brief summary

Prospective observational study of MicroNet covered stent implantation in the elevated risk peripheral lesions (high lesion load, thrombus containing, highly calcified). Open-label, non randomized, single arm observational study. Jagiellonian University Medical College research project.

Detailed description

Peripheral artery stents in routine use (both balloon expandable and self-expendable) do not sufficiently prevent distal embolization. They might induce a cheese-grater effect - a consequence of their single layer design with uncovered space between stent struts. Aim of the study is to evaluate short and long term safety and efficacy of MicroNet covered stent implantation in the high risk lesions beyond the carotid bifurcation. Treatment eligibility will be evaluated by a Vascular Team process (angiologist, vascular surgeon, cardiologist). Optimal pharmacotherapy will be administered according to the current guidelines. Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease requiring endovascular treatment for high risk stenosis (soft plaque, highly calcific plaque) per Vascular Team assessment. A group of 30-50 consecutive patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled.

Interventions

DEVICEMicroNet covered stent implantation in the increased risk arterial lesions beyond the carotid bifurcation

Implantation of the MicroNet covered stent in the increased risk arterial lesions beyond the carotid bifurcation as per Vascular Team recommendation

Sponsors

John Paul II Hospital, Krakow
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria: * Patients older than 18 years, eligible for peripheral artery stenting after Vascular Team evaluation, according to local standards * Written, informed consent to participate * Agreement to attend protocol required (standard) follow up visits and examinations

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy \<1 year (e.g. active neoplastic disease). * Chronic kidney disease with creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL. * Myocardial infarction in 72 hours proceeding the stenting procedure (if possible, postponing the procedure) * Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) * Coagulopathy. * History of uncontrolled contrast media intolerance Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: * De novo lesion in major arteries or grafts connecting arteries * Stenosis eligible for endovascular treatment per Vascular Team evaluation (according to current standards and guidelines) * High risk morphology stenosis (per 2 independent, experienced operators)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of procedural successUp to 48 hours after procedure or until hospital discharge, whichever came first.Procedural success, defined as technical success (successful delivery and implantation of the stent) AND residual stenosis ≤ 30% of vessel lumen diameter AND clinical success (no peri-procedural complications)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vessel patency in CT angiography at 6 monthsAt 6 months after procedureVessel patency in CT angiography (if not contraindicated) at 6 months
Number of In-hospital MACNE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular or Neurological Events)Up to 48 hours after procedure or until hospital discharge, whichever came first.In-hospital MACNE (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, acute limb or target organ ischemia)
Number of MACNE at 30 daysAt 30 days after procedureMACNE at 30 days (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, acute limb or target organ ischemia)
Duplex Ultrasound Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in target vessel at 12 monthsAt 12 months after procedurePeak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) on ultrasound evaluation of the stented segment (if accessible)
Rate of peri-procedural complicationsUp to 48 hours after procedureAny peri-procedural complications until 48 hrs
Duplex Ultrasound Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in the stented segment at discharge24 hours after procedurePeak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) on ultrasound evaluation of the stented segment (if accessible)
Duplex Ultrasound Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in the stented segment at 6 monthsAt 6 months after procedurePeak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) on ultrasound evaluation of the stented segment (if accessible)
Number of MACNE at 6 monthsAt 6 months after procedureMACNE at 6 months (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, acute limb or target organ ischemia)

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactPiotr Musialek, MD, DPhil
p.musialek@szpitaljp2.krakow.pl+48126142287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026