Skip to content

A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of RESP301 Plus Standard of Care (SOC) Compared to SOC Alone in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19

An Open-label, Adaptive Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RESP301 Plus Standard of Care (SOC) Compared to SOC Alone in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19 WHO Grade 3&4 (NOCoV2)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04460183
Enrollment
19
Registered
2020-07-07
Start date
2020-07-29
Completion date
2021-05-21
Last updated
2022-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Brief summary

The effect of RESP301 as an add on treatment to SOC will be evaluated for its efficacy in reducing rate of progression to a more severe level of COVID-19 and for safety, by comparison with SOC alone in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Detailed description

This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel group, concurrent, controlled study using a sequential adaptive design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RESP301 plus SOC versus SOC alone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (World Health Organization \[WHO\] ordinal scale level 3 or 4). Approximately 300 participants will be enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the Investigational arm or the Control arm. The study will be divided into the following periods: Screening period: (up to 2 days), Intervention (up to 10 days), follow-up (Day 14 and Day 28).

Interventions

DRUGRESP301, a Nitric Oxide generating solution

Product application requires inhalation using a standard handheld nebulizer.

OTHERStandard of Care

Participants will receive institutional SOC for the treatment of COVID-19.

Sponsors

Thirty Respiratory Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant has laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection as determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or other approved clinical testing prior to randomization. 2. Participant is hospitalized in relation to COVID-19, requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain SpO2 at a safe level (WHO level 3 & 4). 3. Participant is capable of giving signed informed consent 4. Participant is male or female. All females of childbearing potential, including pregnant females, must consent to urine pregnancy testing at screening to be eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Rapidly deteriorating or likely to require escalation to high flow oxygen, invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support within 24 hours according to Investigator's opinion. 2. Unable to safely receive a nebulized treatment for approximately 8 minutes according to Investigator's opinion. 3. Unable to receive or considered ineligible for invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support. 4. History of methemoglobinemia. 5. Presence of uncontrolled asthma, history of severe bronchospasm. 6. Presence of severe chronic respiratory disease and tracheostomy. 7. Suspected or confirmed untreated, active tuberculosis. 8. Severely immune-compromised participants in Investigator's opinion. 9. Recent active coronary artery disease or decompensated heart failure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline, Day 2 and Day 3A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1= Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. The number of participants that had an increase in at least one level higher score on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7The NEWS is based on a simple aggregate scoring system in which a score is allocated to physiological measurements, already recorded in routine practice, when patients present to, or are being monitored in hospital. Six simple physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: 1. Respiration rate; 2. Oxygen saturation; 3. Systolic blood pressure; 4. Pulse rate; 5. Level of consciousness or new confusion; 6. Temperature. Each score is 0-3 and individual scores are added together for an overall score. An additional two points are added if the patient is receiving oxygen therapy. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk. Higher scores indicate the need for escalation, medical review and possible clinical intervention, and more intensive monitoring.
Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1= Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Change from baseline for Number of Participants on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assesed.
Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleFrom Baseline to Day 28Time to improvement is the time in which the participant sees a decrease after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level lower in days (date of decrease in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not decreased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.
Time to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleFrom Baseline to Day 28Time to progression is the time in which the patient sees an increase after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level higher in days (date of increase in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not increased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.
Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 (Baseline) Post-Nebulization, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7Pulse oximetry measurements were performed to evaluate SpO2. The effect of RESP301 as measured by room air SpO2 was assessed.
Time to Hospital DischargeDay 10Time to hospital discharge is the time in the hospital after first study treatment in days (date of discharge - first dose date + 1). Patients who die before leaving the hospital would be considered failures (did not achieve hospital discharge) and censored. In the case that a patient is still hospitalized at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.
Number of Participants With Mortality by Day 28Day 28Incidence of mortality by Day 28 is the number of participants who have died by Day 28 and the percentage of patients reaching this endpoint will be summarized by treatment group.
Reduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, Day 3Room Air SpO2 for a summary of participants with reduction to \< 90%, unless well clinically tolerated according to Investigator's opinion was assesed.
Events of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to NebulizationFrom screening to safety follow up (Day 28)Incidence of clinical bronchial hyper responsiveness related to nebulization was assessed. Oxygen saturation decreased and wheezing was assessed as an incidence of clinical bronchial hyper-responsiveness related to nebulization, requiring temporal increase of supplemental oxygen.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom screening to safety follow up (Day 28)AEs (non-serious) as variables of safety and tolerability of RESP301 were assessed. Severe AEs is defined as an event that prevents normal everyday activities. An AE that is assessed as severe should not be confused with an SAE. Severe is a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event; and both AE and SAE can be assessed as severe.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 2 centers that enrolled 19 participants in the United Kingdom (UK) from 29-Jul-2020 (First Enrolment) to 21-May-2021 (Last Participant Completed).

Pre-assignment details

The screening period was of 2 days. All the study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RESP301+SoC
Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day (TID) for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care (SoC).
14
Standard of Care (SoC)
Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.
5
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRESP301+SoCStandard of Care (SoC)Total
Age, Customized
<65 years
11 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 142 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1= Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. The number of participants that had an increase in at least one level higher score on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2 and Day 3

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. For RESP301+SoC arm only 1 participant was available for this analysis who had an increase in at least one level higher score on the modified WHO ordinal scale.~For SoC arm, no data were collected. Hence, 0 participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 41 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 50 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 41 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 50 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 51 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 50 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 50 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 60 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleBaseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 70 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleDay 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 50 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each Visit

A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1= Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Change from baseline for Number of Participants on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assesed.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 11 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 08 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -14 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -23 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -11 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 04 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -21 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 04 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -22 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 02 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -11 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 01 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -21 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 00 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
RESP301+SoCChange From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -21 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -12 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 05 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 01 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -21 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 00 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 04 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 2: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 5: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 3: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -22 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 04 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -10 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 7: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -20 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 30 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 6: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 00 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each VisitDay 4: change from baseline: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 40 Participants
Secondary

Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over Time

The NEWS is based on a simple aggregate scoring system in which a score is allocated to physiological measurements, already recorded in routine practice, when patients present to, or are being monitored in hospital. Six simple physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: 1. Respiration rate; 2. Oxygen saturation; 3. Systolic blood pressure; 4. Pulse rate; 5. Level of consciousness or new confusion; 6. Temperature. Each score is 0-3 and individual scores are added together for an overall score. An additional two points are added if the patient is receiving oxygen therapy. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk. Higher scores indicate the need for escalation, medical review and possible clinical intervention, and more intensive monitoring.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants who were analyzed for each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 2-0.8 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 3-1.3 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 41.0 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 5-2.0 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 6-1.5 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
RESP301+SoCChange in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 7-1.0 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 21.4 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 6-2.0 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 0
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 3-0.2 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 5-0.5 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over TimeChange from Baseline: Day 40.5 Score on a NEWS scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over Time

Pulse oximetry measurements were performed to evaluate SpO2. The effect of RESP301 as measured by room air SpO2 was assessed.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) Post-Nebulization, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the number analyzed in each row signified only the participants that were analyzed for each timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 6 - Change from baseline-1.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.41
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 7 - Change from baseline3.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.83
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 - Change from baseline0.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.84
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 2 - Change from baseline-1.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.09
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 3 - Change from baseline0.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.8
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 4 - Change from baseline1.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.61
RESP301+SoCChange in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 5 - Change from baseline0.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.26
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 3 - Change from baseline3.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.08
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 5 - Change from baseline4.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 1 - Change from baselineNA Percent change
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 4 - Change from baseline3.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 2 - Change from baseline1.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.12
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over TimeDay 6 - Change from baseline4.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.54
Secondary

Events of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to Nebulization

Incidence of clinical bronchial hyper responsiveness related to nebulization was assessed. Oxygen saturation decreased and wheezing was assessed as an incidence of clinical bronchial hyper-responsiveness related to nebulization, requiring temporal increase of supplemental oxygen.

Time frame: From screening to safety follow up (Day 28)

Population: The safety analysis set includes the safety (SP) population would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP would be analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set will be used for the safety analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RESP301+SoCEvents of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to Nebulization2 Events
Standard of Care (SoC)Events of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to Nebulization0 Events
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

AEs (non-serious) as variables of safety and tolerability of RESP301 were assessed. Severe AEs is defined as an event that prevents normal everyday activities. An AE that is assessed as severe should not be confused with an SAE. Severe is a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event; and both AE and SAE can be assessed as severe.

Time frame: From screening to safety follow up (Day 28)

Population: The safety analysis set includes the safety (SP) population would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP would be analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set will be used for the safety analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE10 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE of Grade 3 or higher1 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE3 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one severe AE1 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE leading to study treatment withdrawal3 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE leading to study treatment withdrawal1 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE leading to dose interruption1 Participants
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE leading to dose interruption1 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE leading to dose interruption0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE2 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE leading to study treatment withdrawal0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE of Grade 3 or higher0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one AE leading to dose interruption0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one treatment-related AE leading to study treatment withdrawal0 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least one severe AE0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Mortality by Day 28

Incidence of mortality by Day 28 is the number of participants who have died by Day 28 and the percentage of patients reaching this endpoint will be summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: The safety analysis set includes the safety (SP) population would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP would be analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set will be used for the safety analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RESP301+SoCNumber of Participants With Mortality by Day 280 Participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Number of Participants With Mortality by Day 280 Participants
Secondary

Reduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%

Room Air SpO2 for a summary of participants with reduction to \< 90%, unless well clinically tolerated according to Investigator's opinion was assesed.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, Day 3

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the number analyzed in each row signified only the participants that were analyzed for each time point.~Standard of Care (SoC) participants did not receive any nebulization. Hence, no participants were analyzed for Pre-nebulization and Post-nebulization. Therefore, no data were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 1 Pre-Nebulization95.0 Percent change
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 1 Post-Nebulization93.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.12
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 2 Pre-Nebulization94.0 Percent change
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 2 Post-Nebulization86.0 Percent change
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 3 Pre-Nebulization96.0 Percent change
RESP301+SoCReduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%Day 3 Post-Nebulization94.0 Percent change
Secondary

Time to Hospital Discharge

Time to hospital discharge is the time in the hospital after first study treatment in days (date of discharge - first dose date + 1). Patients who die before leaving the hospital would be considered failures (did not achieve hospital discharge) and censored. In the case that a patient is still hospitalized at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.

Time frame: Day 10

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signified only the participants who were discharged from hospital.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RESP301+SoCTime to Hospital Discharge4.00 Days
Standard of Care (SoC)Time to Hospital Discharge6.00 Days
Secondary

Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

Time to improvement is the time in which the participant sees a decrease after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level lower in days (date of decrease in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not decreased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 28

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signified only the participants who decrease by at least one level.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RESP301+SoCTime to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale4.00 Days
Standard of Care (SoC)Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale5.00 Days
Secondary

Time to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

Time to progression is the time in which the patient sees an increase after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level higher in days (date of increase in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not increased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 28

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signified only the participants who increase by at least one level.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RESP301+SoCTime to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal ScaleNA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026