Skip to content

Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors

The Association Between Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors: a Cross-over Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04459104
Enrollment
121
Registered
2020-07-07
Start date
2020-09-21
Completion date
2022-12-19
Last updated
2023-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

breast cancer survivors, chronic low back pain, nutrition, diet, glycemic response, fasting glucose level, chronic pain

Brief summary

The development of chronic pain is one of the most seen sequelae in the cancer survivor population. Literature reports the presence of pain in approximately 40% of 5-year survivors. Specifically, in breast cancer survivors, chronic pain is estimated to be present in at least 50% of this population. On the other hand, chronic low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability and decrease in quality of life. It has huge economical, psychological and social impacts on individuals, society and health institutions. Unhealthy dietary behavior is associated with the occurrence, maintenance and management of chronic pain. Also, excessive calorie intake and diets rich in sugar, fat, sodium and caffeine were observed in patients having chronic pain. However, although nutritional factors are suggested as an associated lifestyle factor of chronic pain, limited attention is given to dietary and nutritional factors in relation to chronic pain. One particular mechanism drawing attention in the link between nutrition and pain are blood glucose levels and the glycemic response. Animal research shows the potential for reduced blood glucose to influence several pathways involved in chronic pain, including decreased oxidative stress, and reduced neuronal excitability. Given the link between blood glucose levels, as well as the evidence for the importance of interpersonal variability in the glycemic response, this glycemic response can also be of interest for chronic pain research. Finding a possible link between both the glycemic response and pain-related outcomes, could give direction to further research focussing on implementing (personalized) nutritional/dietary advise to maintain healthy blood glucose levels in people suffering from chronic pain. Therefore, this study will provide the first step in this promising line of research, by being the first to look for differences in glycemic response between breast cancer survivors having chronic pain and healthy pain-free controls, and between chronic low back pain patients and healthy pain-free controls. Secondly, this study will also investigate possible associations between glycemic response, pain-related outcomes, nutrition related outcomes, physical activity, and body composition for breast cancer survivors and chronic low back pain patients separately in comparison with healthy pain-free controls.

Detailed description

Study Design: This study will be carried out as an experimental, cross-over study, including two pain populations, one control group and two assessment sessions. At the first session, firstly, all participants will undergo an assessment including pain-related outcomes, nutrition-related outcomes, and measures of physical activity, quality of life, body composition, and fasting blood glucose. Secondly, participants will be given a test beverage (with a high or low glycemic index, randomly decided), after which blood glucose levels will be assessed several times during the next 120 minutes. At the second session, two days later (washout period), only fasting blood glucose levels will be tested again, after which the study participants will be given the other test beverage, after which blood glucose levels will be monitored once more for 120 minutes. Other outcome measures will not be re-assessed after exposure to the beverages, as we do not expect a direct influence of these test beverages on the outcome variables. Results will be analysed and published separately for chronic low back pain patients and breast cancer survivors. Recruitment of participants: Participants will be recruited via posters and flyers. These posters and flyers will also be distributed to general practitioners, pharmacists, physiotherapists, health insurance companies, etc., who will be asked to alert potential participants to the possibility of study participation. Information and recruitment messages will also be placed on the website and social media platforms of the Pain in Motion research group. Informed consent: Prior to participating in the studies, each participant will be asked to read and sign a participant information sheet and a consent form

Interventions

Participants will be given test beverages containing 50gr of isomaltulose (low glycemic index = 32). Isomaltulose powder will be dissolved in 250mL water, and participants will be instructed to consume this beverage within 5 minutes. Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages. The first two drops of blood will be discarded, the third drop will be used for testing.

Participants will be given test beverages containing 50gr sucrose (high glycemic index = 65). Sucrose powder will be dissolved in 250mL water, and participants will be instructed to consume this beverage within 5 minutes. Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages. The first two drops of blood will be discarded, the third drop will be used for testing.

Sponsors

KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

GROUP 1=Chronic Low Back Pain Inclusion Criteria * Women between 18 and 65 years old; * Native Dutch speaker; * Experiencing chronic nonspecific low back pain (i.e. pain present for at least 3 months, at least 3 days per week); * No new medication or new treatments started in the 6 weeks prior to or during study participation; * Non-specific failed back surgery can be included if the operation was anatomically successful and happened at least 3 years ago; * No physical exertions over 3 Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) in the 3 days before the assessments; * No analgesics/ caffeine/ alcohol/ nicotine 48 hours prior to the assessments

Exclusion criteria

* People who have any other diagnosed systemic diseases e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases etc; * Participants who have neuropathic pain according to Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire and the S-LANSS Neuropathic Pain Score; * Chronic widespread pain diagnosis (like fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, whiplash); * Current pregnancy or pregnant in the past year; * Specific spinal pathology (e.g., hernia, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, spinal fracture or malignancy) GROUP 2= Breast Cancer Survivors Inclusion Criteria * Female breast cancer survivors with chronic pain (lasting at least 3 months, at least 3 days per week); * Participants between 18 and 65 years old; * Native Dutch speaker; * Active treatment ended at least 3 months ago (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy; hormone and immune therapy can be going on); * No analgesics/ caffeine/ alcohol/ nicotine 48 hours prior to the assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycemic responseat the 1st dayBlood glucose levels will be measured using OneTouch Verio (LifeScan Europe, Johnson & Johnson, Switzerland). Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Central Sensitization Inventoryat the 1st dayThe Central Sensitization Inventory assesses symptoms that can indicate central sensitization mechanisms. It includes two sections, Part A and Part B, which can be used independently from each other. In this study, only Part A will be used, which includes 25 questions scored on a Likert Scale ranging from 0 (i.e. never) to 4 (i.e. always). Summing these scores, a total score between 0 and 100 is obtained. The CSI showed a cut-off of 40 to indicate the possible presence of central sensitization.
Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaireat the 1st dayThe Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire is a screening tool for neuropathic pain. It consists of four main questions, which all include 10 sub-questions. Each of these subquestions can be answered with YES (1 point) or NO (0 points). Scores which are equal or higher to 4 out of 10 indicate the possible presence of neuropathic problems that underly the pain problem.
Electrical Detection Thresholdat the 1st dayElectrical detection thresholds will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria) at the bilateral sural nerve, and at the bilateral median nerve (i.e. four test sites). Each stimulus will be a constant current rectangular pulse train consisting of 5 pulses delivered at a frequency of 250 Hertz. Stimulation will start at 0 milli amper and will be gradually increased using steps of 0.5 milli amper until the patient is experiencing a faint sensation.
Electrical PainThresholdat the 1st dayElectrical pain thresholds will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria) at the bilateral sural nerve, and at the bilateral median nerve (i.e. four test sites). Each stimulus will be a constant current rectangular pulse train consisting of 5 pulses delivered at a frequency of 250 Hertz. Stimulation will start at 0 milli amper and will be gradually increased using steps of 0.5 milli amper until the stimulus is experienced as painful.
Electrical Temporal Summationat the 1st dayElectrical temporal summation will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria). Temporal summation will be assessed by delivering 20 electrical stimuli at the previously determined intensity of the electrical pain threshold. The patient will be asked to give a verbal numeric rating scale score ranging from 0 (= no pain) to 100 (= worst possible pain) at the 1st, the 10th and the 20th stimulus. The outcome measures for temporal summation will be the differences between the 10th and 1st pain score, the 20th and 10th pain score and 20th and 1st pain score.
Electrical Offset Analgesiaat the 1st dayElectrical offset analgesia will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria). Electrical stimuli will be applied as a train of rectangular pulses delivered by a constant current stimulator. The stimulation intensity will be calculated using the electrical pain threshold. The study participants will be given the painful stimuli into three times intervals and using three intensities; T1 (5 seconds at 150% of Electrical pain threshold), T2 (5 second at 180% of Electrical Pain threshold) and T3 (20 seconds at 150% Electrical pain threshold). Afterwards, participants will undergo a control electrical stimulus which encompasses 30 seconds of constant electrical stimulation at 150% of the Electrical pain threshold. During each application (control trial, T1, T2, and T3) participants need to report their intensity of pain on a visual analogue scale. The scale is anchored by no pain(score of 0) and worst imaginable pain (score of 100).
Pressure Pain Thresholdat the 1st dayPressure pain thresholds measure hyperalgesia by means of a digital pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich) with a 1 centimetre square tip. Pressure will be increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second. Subjects need to say stop when the pressure is experienced as painful.
3 day dietary dairyat the 1st dayThe diary asks for dietary intake information of two weekdays and one day in the weekend. Collected data with the 3-day food diary will allow us to find out approximate calorie intake, micronutrient intake, macronutrient intake of each participant.
Healthy Eating Indexat the 1 st dayCollected data with the 3-day food diary will allow us to calculate the Healthy Eating Index. The Healthy Eating Index consists of thirteen items of which nine items (total fruit, whole fruit, vegetables, greens and beans, whole grains, dairy, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, fatty acids) are recommended to consume, while the consumption of the other four items (refined grains, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats) should be as low as possible in order to achieve a healthy diet. Score for the Healthy Eating Index range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent healthier diets
Brief Pain Inventoryat the 1st dayThe Brief Pain Inventory allows to rate the worst pain in the last 24 hours, the least pain in the last 24 hours, the average pain and the pain intensity at the moment of filling out the questionnaire. This tool also assesses the interference of pain with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep via an 11-point numeric rating pain scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Short Form- 36 Quality of Lifeat the 1st dayShort Form-36 contains 36 questions across 7 subscales, namely, general health, limitations of activities, physical health problems, emotional health problems, social activities, pain and energy and emotions. Each domain ranked between 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better.
International Physical Activity Questionnaireat the 1st dayThe International Physical Activity Questionnaire consists of 5 main domains (1-job-related physical activity; 2-transportation related physical activity; 3-housework, house maintenance, and caring for family-related physical activity; 4-recreation, sports, and leisure-time physical activity; and 5-time spent sitting) with 27 context-specific physical activity questions. Higher scores indicates better.
Body Weightat the 1st dayTANITA MC-780MA bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body weight in kilograms and body weight percentage.
Body fat massat the 1st dayTANITA MC-780MA bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body fat mass in kilograms and body fat mass percentage.
Body muscle massat the 1st dayTANITA MC-780MA bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body muscle mass in kilograms and body muscle mass percentage.
Body waterat the 1st dayTANITA MC-780MA bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body water in kilograms and body water percentage.
Body Heightat the 1st dayBody height in meters will be measured using a Seca length meter.
Body Mass Indexat the 1st dayBody weight and height will be combined to report body mass index in kilogram per meter squared.
Mediterranean Diet Scoreat the 1st dayA nine-point score of the Mediterranean Diet Score can be calculated using gender-specific medians of intake. A value above the median is rated 1, below the median 0. Higher scores represent healthier diets.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026