Hospice Decision Making
Conditions
Brief summary
Despite the documented benefits of hospice, less than 2 million people utilize hospice services annually. Underuse disparities are extreme across race and ethnicity as White Americans comprise 85% of all hospice enrollees. AAs account for only 8% of hospice enrollees but are more likely to die from the top three hospice diagnoses (i.e. cancer, heart disease and dementia) than White Americans. Even when AAs enroll in hospice, they spend less time in hospice than White patients, averaging fewer than seven days in hospice care. Notably, AA hospice enrollees report a higher degree of satisfaction with end of life care when hospice is involved, as compared to AAs who are not enrolled in hospice care. There are several potential barriers that may prevent AAs from enrolling in hospice care including lack of knowledge of hospice care, mistrust in healthcare, perceived discrimination, health literacy. AAs routinely report less knowledge of hospice than White Americans, and the information that AA know about hospice often comes from non-medical professionals and is inaccurate. Some AA have persistent mistrust in healthcare due to events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments and many AA perceive discrimination when accessing healthcare. Data shows that health literacy is a stronger predictor of hospice use than race and older AAs are more likely to possess low health literacy. The driving hypothesis of this research is that by providing clear and accurate information to older AAs will help address the underutilization of hospice by clarifying misperceptions, building trust, and overcoming literacy barriers. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are an evidence-based approach to improve patient agency in medical decision making. Research shows that AA report a desire for more agency and autonomy in decision-making yet the use of PtDAs is understudied in AA communities. This proposal offers a unique opportunity to address many of the potential barriers that may prevent older AAs from enrolling in hospice, while simultaneously expanding the literature of SDM specific to older AAs. The goals of this proposal are to evaluate if the relationships between health literacy and hospice knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs is mediated by mistrust in healthcare and perceived discrimination among AAs aged 65 or older (Aim1) and to evaluate the effect of the hospice PtDA on changing hospice knowledge and attitudes and beliefs about hospice in AA aged 65 and older (Aim 2).
Interventions
A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Self identify as Black or African American * At least 65 years of age
Exclusion criteria
* Non-English speakers. * Patients with cognitive Impairments preventing ability to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hospice Knowledge Scale | 1 month | Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge. |
| Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale | 1 month | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice. |
| Decision Self Efficacy Scale | 1 month | Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Colorado, Denver
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Receive hospice patient decision aid
A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.: A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care | 72 |
| Control Does not receive hospice decision aid | 72 |
| Total | 144 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 72 Participants | 72 Participants | 144 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Decision Self-Efficacy Scale | 78 units on a scale | 72 units on a scale | 75 units on a scale |
| Hospice Beliefs and Attitudes Scale | 28 units on a scale | 27 units on a scale | 27.5 units on a scale |
| Hospice Knowledge Test | 17 units on a scale | 17 units on a scale | 17 units on a scale |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 72 Participants | 72 Participants | 144 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 72 participants | 72 participants | 144 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 58 Participants | 59 Participants | 117 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 13 Participants | 27 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Decision Self Efficacy Scale
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.
Time frame: 1 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Decision Self Efficacy Scale | 89 units on a scale |
| Control | Decision Self Efficacy Scale | 78 units on a scale |
Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale
Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice.
Time frame: 1 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale | 31 units on a scale |
| Control | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale | 30 units on a scale |
Hospice Knowledge Scale
Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge.
Time frame: 1 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Hospice Knowledge Scale | 17 units on a scale |
| Control | Hospice Knowledge Scale | 17 units on a scale |