Skip to content

Underutilization of Hospice in Older African Americans

Underutilization of Hospice in Older African Americans

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04458090
Enrollment
144
Registered
2020-07-07
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hospice Decision Making

Brief summary

Despite the documented benefits of hospice, less than 2 million people utilize hospice services annually. Underuse disparities are extreme across race and ethnicity as White Americans comprise 85% of all hospice enrollees. AAs account for only 8% of hospice enrollees but are more likely to die from the top three hospice diagnoses (i.e. cancer, heart disease and dementia) than White Americans. Even when AAs enroll in hospice, they spend less time in hospice than White patients, averaging fewer than seven days in hospice care. Notably, AA hospice enrollees report a higher degree of satisfaction with end of life care when hospice is involved, as compared to AAs who are not enrolled in hospice care. There are several potential barriers that may prevent AAs from enrolling in hospice care including lack of knowledge of hospice care, mistrust in healthcare, perceived discrimination, health literacy. AAs routinely report less knowledge of hospice than White Americans, and the information that AA know about hospice often comes from non-medical professionals and is inaccurate. Some AA have persistent mistrust in healthcare due to events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments and many AA perceive discrimination when accessing healthcare. Data shows that health literacy is a stronger predictor of hospice use than race and older AAs are more likely to possess low health literacy. The driving hypothesis of this research is that by providing clear and accurate information to older AAs will help address the underutilization of hospice by clarifying misperceptions, building trust, and overcoming literacy barriers. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are an evidence-based approach to improve patient agency in medical decision making. Research shows that AA report a desire for more agency and autonomy in decision-making yet the use of PtDAs is understudied in AA communities. This proposal offers a unique opportunity to address many of the potential barriers that may prevent older AAs from enrolling in hospice, while simultaneously expanding the literature of SDM specific to older AAs. The goals of this proposal are to evaluate if the relationships between health literacy and hospice knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs is mediated by mistrust in healthcare and perceived discrimination among AAs aged 65 or older (Aim1) and to evaluate the effect of the hospice PtDA on changing hospice knowledge and attitudes and beliefs about hospice in AA aged 65 and older (Aim 2).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALA decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.

A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Self identify as Black or African American * At least 65 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speakers. * Patients with cognitive Impairments preventing ability to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospice Knowledge Scale1 monthHospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge.
Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale1 monthHospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice.
Decision Self Efficacy Scale1 monthDecision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChanning E Tate, MPH, PhD(c)

University of Colorado, Denver

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Receive hospice patient decision aid A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.: A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care
72
Control
Does not receive hospice decision aid
72
Total144

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
72 Participants72 Participants144 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale78 units on a scale72 units on a scale75 units on a scale
Hospice Beliefs and Attitudes Scale28 units on a scale27 units on a scale27.5 units on a scale
Hospice Knowledge Test17 units on a scale17 units on a scale17 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
72 Participants72 Participants144 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants72 participants144 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants59 Participants117 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Decision Self Efficacy Scale

Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
InterventionDecision Self Efficacy Scale89 units on a scale
ControlDecision Self Efficacy Scale78 units on a scale
Primary

Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale

Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
InterventionHospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale31 units on a scale
ControlHospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale30 units on a scale
Primary

Hospice Knowledge Scale

Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
InterventionHospice Knowledge Scale17 units on a scale
ControlHospice Knowledge Scale17 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026