Easy Insertion, Complications Ans Suitability of i Gel and Air Q LMA
Conditions
Brief summary
This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.
Detailed description
The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation. The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.
Interventions
OTHERLMA i gel
insertion of LMA for maintaining airway during anesthesia
Sponsors
Ain Shams University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ASA grade I-II * operative time of ≤60 minutes
Exclusion criteria
* age \>10 years * ASA grade ≥II * current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection * presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies * pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration * allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Supraglottic device success rate | 60 minutes | Fitness of LMA for ventilation |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed