Skip to content

Cascading Dissemination of a Foster Parent Intervention

Cascading Dissemination of a Foster Parent Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04456738
Acronym
KEEP
Enrollment
704
Registered
2020-07-02
Start date
2000-07-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2020-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Welfare, Foster Home Care

Keywords

child behavior, parent training

Brief summary

The primary goal of this study is to test the effectiveness of KEEP (Keeping Foster Parents Supported and Trained), an intervention intended to increase supports and consultation to foster parents, and to evaluate the transferability of the proposed intervention from Oregon to the foster care system in San Diego.

Detailed description

Children in the foster care system are growing in number, are at high risk for psychological problems, and are increasingly challenging to their foster parents. Foster parents who are trying to provide care and nurturing to these children are often doing so without benefit or meaningful or relevant consultation on developmental and mental health issues. The study tests the effectiveness of an intervention intended to increase supports and consultation to foster parents. A major aim of this study was to test the transferability of the proposed intervention from Oregon to the foster care system in San Diego in 3 regions of Health and Human Services. A cascading dissemination model will be employed, where the original developers train and supervise staff in San Diego to implement the intervention, and in the second iteration of the of the intervention, the involvement of the original developers lessened. The intervention is designed to provide foster parents with general support and specific parent management training (PMT), a well-documented and effective intervention approach. In a previous efficacy trial, PMT had positive effects with foster parents in three areas: 1) reduction of child symptoms, 2) lower rates of disruption in foster care (changes in placements for negative reasons), and 3) fewer foster parents in the PMT condition dropped out of providing foster care. Outcomes will be evaluated at multiple levels, including child symptoms, functional behavior, environments, consumer perspectives, and system using a multi-method/multi-agent strategy. Implementation fidelity will be assessed, as will contextual factors, including the organizational climate and social isolation/insularity of the foster parents. It is hypothesized that, compared to controls, foster parents in the intervention group will improve on parenting skills, feel more supported, and have less stress, which in turn will result in more positive child outcomes, including fewer reported child symptoms and higher levels of child functional behavior in three domains (i.e., home, school, with peers). Improvements in foster parent outcomes and child outcomes are both hypothesized to predict system-level outcomes, including child use of mental health services, foster parent retention, and placement disruptions. Contextual factors are expected to impact foster parent outcomes directly and child and system outcomes indirectly, through implementation fidelity.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALParent Training

16 weeks of of parent training led by a trained group facilitator

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Oregon Social Learning Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any child between ages 5 and 12 years in relative or non-relative foster care

Exclusion criteria

* Only medically fragile children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in placement disruptions rates for foster placements18 months post baselineUsing child welfare system placement records, rates of disruptions for pre and post time frames are calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in child behavior problems as assessed by the Parent Daily Report (PDR)Baseline, 6 months-, 12 months-, and 18 months post baselineThe PDR is a brief telephone interview that collects data the number problem behaviors that occurred in the previous 24 hours. This measure is repeated three times at each wave.
Change in rates of reunification with Biological Family as assessed by child welfare system placement recordsBaseline through 18 months post baselineUsing child welfare system placement records, rates of reunification between baseline and 18 months are calculated.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026