Skip to content

Quality of Life After Rectal Cancer Surgery

Comparison of Quality of Life Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04455945
Enrollment
2
Registered
2020-07-02
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2020-06-19
Last updated
2020-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life, Rectal Cancer

Keywords

rectal cancer surgery, life quality, questionnaire

Brief summary

Following colorectal surgery, many patients face a combination of physical and emotional problems for a long period of time. Symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and disturbed bowel and sexual function, as well as problems in social and role functioning, inevitably affect the patients' well-being. Therefore, evaluation of the self-reported quality of life (QoL) is becoming increasingly important in clinical trials. The investigators aimed to compare long term health related life quality (HRQoL) results of laparoscopic approach with open approach in patients with sphincter preserving resections for rectal cancer at a single-center.

Detailed description

This study is planned prospectively. All patients scheduled for operation due to rectal cancer in our clinic between January 2017 and December 2018 will be evaluated for suitability for the study. During the preoperative examination, patients will be informed about the study and their written consent will be obtained. Patients will be randomized between open and laparoscopic groups in the ratio 2:1, depending on the type of surgery. Clinical data of patients will be analyzed from the hospital database programme. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires prepared by The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) will be used to evaluate the quality of life after the operation. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire will be completed by examining the patients' daily observation notes. EORTC QLQ-CR29 will be completed with face to face interviews in the first year after surgery. In this way, it will be aimed to compare the early and long-term quality of life (HRQoL) results of open and laparoscopic approach in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen Rectal cancer surgery

Open sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Rectal cancer surgery

Laparoscopic sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer

Sponsors

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) for rectal cancer in our department.

Exclusion criteria

* The patients whose all oncological treatments had not been completed at least 6 months ago * The patients with ASA IV score * The patients with previous abdominal surgery * The patients who had developed major surgical complications (such as anastomosis leakage, requiring re-laparotomy, evisceration) * The patients who underwent a new abdominal surgery except for stoma closure * The patients with local recurrence or distant metastases * The patients who still had a stoma * The patients who did not want to take part in the study * The patients who missed in the follow-up period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AgeBefore surgeryYears
GenderBefore surgeryMale/Female
BMIBefore surgerykg/m²
ASABefore surgeryI, II, III, IV
Tumor LocalizationDuring the operationUpper/Middle/Low
Pathologic Stageup to 10 days after surgery1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C
ComplicationsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearyes/no
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional scalesDuring one week after surgeryGlobal/Physical/Role/Cognitive/Social functioning. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Symptom scalesDuring one week after surgeryFatigue/Nausea and vomiting/Pain/Dyspnoea/Insomnia/Appetite loss/Constipation/Diarrhoea/Financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Functional scalesDuring one year after surgeryBody Image/Future projections/Weight/Sexual interest. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Symptom scalesDuring one year after surgeryUrinary frequency/Blood and mucus in stool/Stool frequency/Urinary incontinence/Dysuria/Abdominal pain/Buttock pain/Bloating/Dry mouth/Hair loss/Taste/Flatulence/Faecal incontinence/Sore skin/Embarrassment/Impotence/Dyspareunia. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026