Skip to content

A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder

A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder (A Randomized Cross Over Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04455672
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-07-02
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2021-09-26
Last updated
2020-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorder

Brief summary

• to compare the relief of pain for patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction between two groups; in the first group a digitally formed stabilizing splint followed by an anterior repositioning splint (ARS) and the second group a digitally fabricated (ARS) splints followed by a stabilizing splints

Interventions

DEVICEsplints

* Scaning of the maxillary and mandibular cast in the centric relation. * The CAD/ CAM splints will be designed using Exocad s. * The design will include all maxillary teeth and the occlusal surfaces will be flat and smooth. * The difference in design between the ARS and the stabilization splint, is that the ARS will have an anterior ramp to allow for posterior disocclusion of posterior teeth, while the stabilization splint will not have such a pronounced anterior ramp. * Both splints will be printed using Dent2 3D printer and then cured using Dentcure. * All patient will be asked to wear their spints during sleeping only. * In each group, patient will be recalled after 1week,2 weeks 1,2and 3monthes then change for the other splint for another 3 months .

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • TMDs according to the research diagnostic criteria (RDC)8 which include: i. Painful TMJ audible and palpable click unilateral or bilateral ii. Presence of clicking during opening. iii. TMJ tenderness. * Fully dentate patients without any malocclusion (natural or restored by fixed prothesis) and good oral hygiene. * Co-operative patient that should show motivation to follow up.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with systemic diseases which could affect TMJ, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthrosis, Myasthenia Gravis and fibromyalgia. * Patients taking analgesic, muscle relaxant, or anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded because such drugs could influence the results. * Patients with removable dental prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain relief6 monthsquestionnaire will be used to evaluate the pain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026