Skip to content

Ab Interno Gelatin Stent With Mitomycin C Using Targeted Supra-tenon's Placement

Ab Interno Gelatin Stent With Mitomycin C Using Targeted Supra-tenon's Placement

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04454138
Enrollment
142
Registered
2020-07-01
Start date
2019-06-25
Completion date
2020-04-20
Last updated
2020-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Brief summary

The Xen-45 gelatin microstent is a novel, bleb-forming microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Despite demonstrating similar efficacy and safety to trabeculectomy (traditional surgery), the Xen-45 gelatin microstent continues to suffer from occasional surgical failure due to fibrosis of the filtering bleb, and obstruction of the stent. During surgery, placement in a surgery known as supra-tenon's space is believed to maximize aqueous outflow, while preventing obstruction, limiting fibrosis of the bleb, and promoting long-term patency. Despite the theoretical merits, long-term data of outcomes after targeted supra-tenon's placement is needed to fully assess its potential in improving Xen-45 microstent outcomes.

Detailed description

The Xen-45 gelatin microstent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a novel, bleb-forming microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Creation of a filtering bleb through the gel stent and under the conjunctiva lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by bypassing the natural outflow pathway of aqueous. A recent retrospective cohort study showed comparable safety and risk of failure to trabeculectomy. Amongst the main advantages of this device is the ability to create a bleb without dissecting and disrupting tissue, thus decreasing the amount of wound healing and potentially limiting bleb failure. However, despite demonstrating similar efficacy and safety to trabeculectomy,2 the Xen-45 gelatin microstent continues to suffer from occasional surgical failure due to fibrosis of the filtering bleb, and obstruction of the stent. Although antimetabolites, such as mitomycin C, have decreased reactionary wound healing that can result following surgery, fibrosis may still occur, especially when the components of the Xen-45 gelatin microstent are in close proximity to the fibroblastic structures of tenon's fascia.Tenon's capsule resembles a sponge-like layer with multiple adhesions to the overlying conjunctiva and underlying episclera. Implantation of the XEN within this space creates a higher risk of obstruction and subsequent failure. To ensure the lowest potential for occlusion, bleb scarring, and failure, one must ensure careful placement of the device in the subconjunctival space, avoiding intra-tenon's placement. Placement in the supra-tenon's space is believed to maximize aqueous outflow, while preventing obstruction, limiting fibrosis of the bleb, and promoting long-term patency. Despite the theoretical merits, long-term data of outcomes after targeted supra-tenon's placement is needed to fully assess its potential in improving Xen-45 microstent outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEXEN-45 gelatin microstent

Placement either in the subconjunctival space or supratenon's area

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Prism Eye Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 30-90 with primary or pigmentary/pseudoexfolliative open angle, primary closed angle, or combined mechanism glaucoma with IOP of 18-40 mmHg on maximum tolerated medical therapy who received a gelatin stent with MMC at Prism Eye Institute from June 2012 to August 2019.

Exclusion criteria

* Other forms of glaucoma * Prior incisional glaucoma surgery * CPC * Prior corneal graft (PKP, DALK, DSAEK, DMEK).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 6.Post op year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) +/- medications
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 4.Post op Year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤17 (mmHg) +/- medication
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 5.Post op Year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤21 (mmHg) on no medications
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement.Post op year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) on no medications
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 2.Post op Year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) +/- Medications
Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 3.Post op year 1Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤17 (mmHg) on no medications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.Post op year 1Presence or absence of the following management interventions (not considered complications): bleb needling, AC reformation, suture release, digital ocular compression, use of glaucoma medications, or laser/tpa to blocked ostomy or lumen.
Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.Post op year 1Presence or absence of the following complications: i. Starting after POM1: shallow AC w/ iridocorneal touch, any hyphema, corneal edema, wound leak/dehiscience, choroidal effusion, malignant glaucoma, dellen/non-healing epithelial defect, ptosis, diplopia. ii. At any point: additional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, vitreous hemorrhage, ≥2mm hyphema, hypotony maculopathy, implant migration/blockage/exposure/extrusion, macular edema, choroidal effusion/hemorrhage requiring drainage, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, suture abscess/blebitis/endophthalmitis

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45
Implantation of the XEN-45 gelatin microstent within the subconjunctival space, avoiding intra-tenon's placement. XEN-45 gelatin microstent: Placement either in the subconjunctival space or supratenon's area
65
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45
Placement of Xen-45 gelatin microstent in the supra-tenon's space to maximize aqueous outflow, while preventing obstruction, limiting fibrosis of the bleb, and promoting long-term patency. XEN-45 gelatin microstent: Placement either in the subconjunctival space or supratenon's area
77
Total142

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-targeted Placement of XEN 45Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Total
Age, Continuous65.4 years78 years70.9 years
Combined Mechanism Glaucoma6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Concomitant Cataract Surgery24 Participants38 Participants62 Participants
Cup to Disk Ratio0.9 Ratio0.8 Ratio0.8 Ratio
Diabetic22 Participants11 Participants33 Participants
IOP > 21 mmHg32 Participants42 Participants74 Participants
IOP median21 mmHg22 mmHg21 mmHg
Laser Peripheral Iridotomy8 Participants16 Participants24 Participants
Laser Trabeculoplasty47 Participants41 Participants88 Participants
Medication Classes4 Medication Classes4 Medication Classes4 Medication Classes
Mild Disease22 Participants52 Participants74 Participants
Moderate to Severe Disease42 Participants25 Participants67 Participants
Number of Patients who received XEN 45 in Left Eye32 Participants36 Participants68 Participants
Pigment Dispersion Glaucoma3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)0.2 logMAR0.3 logMAR0.2 logMAR
Preoperative Mean Deviation on Visual Field to Normal Population-8.4 decibel-1.7 decibel-4 decibel
Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma1 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma48 Participants42 Participants90 Participants
Pseudoexfoliation7 Participants21 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
41 Participants59 Participants100 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
65 participants77 participants142 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants36 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants41 Participants79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 77
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 650 / 77
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 77

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) on no medications

Time frame: Post op year 1

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement.20 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement.15 Participants
Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 2.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) +/- Medications

Time frame: Post op Year 1

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 2.33 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 2.22 Participants
Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 3.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤17 (mmHg) on no medications

Time frame: Post op year 1

Population: Per protocol polulation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 3.28 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 3.18 Participants
Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 4.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤17 (mmHg) +/- medication

Time frame: Post op Year 1

Population: per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 4.41 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 4.26 Participants
Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 5.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤21 (mmHg) on no medications

Time frame: Post op Year 1

Population: per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 5.31 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 5.19 Participants
Primary

Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 6.

Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of ≥6 and ≤14 (mmHg) +/- medications

Time frame: Post op year 1

Population: per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 6.47 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 6.28 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.

Presence or absence of the following complications: i. Starting after POM1: shallow AC w/ iridocorneal touch, any hyphema, corneal edema, wound leak/dehiscience, choroidal effusion, malignant glaucoma, dellen/non-healing epithelial defect, ptosis, diplopia. ii. At any point: additional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, vitreous hemorrhage, ≥2mm hyphema, hypotony maculopathy, implant migration/blockage/exposure/extrusion, macular edema, choroidal effusion/hemorrhage requiring drainage, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, suture abscess/blebitis/endophthalmitis

Time frame: Post op year 1

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.35 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.48 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.

Presence or absence of the following management interventions (not considered complications): bleb needling, AC reformation, suture release, digital ocular compression, use of glaucoma medications, or laser/tpa to blocked ostomy or lumen.

Time frame: Post op year 1

Population: per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Non-targeted Placement of XEN 45Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.32 Participants
Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN 45Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement.40 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026