Skip to content

A Comparison of Different Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

A Comparison of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test and Qualitative Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Medium and High Risk Screening Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04454099
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2020-07-01
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2021-03-18
Last updated
2021-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Colorectal cancer, fecal occult blood testing, quantitative fecal immunochemical test

Brief summary

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. CRC-related death can be prevented through fecal occult blood test screening. Because of economic and high sensitivity, fecal immunochemical test is recommended for screening population of CRC. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of 4 different fecal occult blood testing in medium and high risk screening population in Chinese.

Detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer worldwide, and cause a huge number of cancer-associated mortality. CRC screening has been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of, and mortality from, CRC. There are several recommended screening options for screening population of CRC, including colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) .Colonoscopy has higher sensitivity and specificity than FOBT for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia but also has several disadvantages, including higher cost and poorer compliance. Therefore, many patients prefer FOBT to colonoscopy. FOBT includes guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). FIT includes quantitative FIT (qFIT) and qualitative FIT. qFIT can provide a value of concentration of hemoglobin in stool and are increasingly recommended for CRC. In China, the most common use FOBT is qualitative FIT and the comparison of quantitative and qualitative FIT is lack in screening population of CRC in Chinese. To add to the evidence on FIT performance characteristics for detection of CRC, the investigators design this research to compare qFIT with other 3 qualitative FOBT(two of them are colloidal gold qualitative FITs and one of them is chemical and immunologic combined detection)in medium and high risk screening population.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST4 kind of FOBT and colonoscopy with pathological examination

Detect Hb in stool by 4 kind of FOBT and detect colon lesion using colonoscopy and pathological examination.

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 50-75 years old; * Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score(APCS): medium or high risk.

Exclusion criteria

* APCS score: low risk; * People with history of intestinal surgery; * People with history of CRC; * People with history of inflammatory bowel disease, ischemic enteritis, vascular malformation of intestine or other disease resulting in intestinal tract bleeding; * People with symptoms including visible rectal bleeding, hematuria, severe and acute diarrhea and Bristol feces score 7th type; * Pregnancy, lactation or menstrual phase; * Severe congestive heart failure or other sever disease cause cannot tolerate colonoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The accuracy of 4 kind of FOBTs to diagnose CRC.6 monthsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these 4 FOBTs to detect CRC.
The accuracy of 4 kind of FOBTs to diagnose advanced colorectal neoplasm.6 monthsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these 4 FOBTs to detect advanced colorectal neoplasm.
The accuracy of 4 kind of FOBTs to diagnose advanced adenoma.6 monthsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these 4 FOBTs to detect advanced adenoma.
Develop a predictive model of CRC or advanced colorectal neoplasm which includes qFIT.6 monthsDevelop a predictive model of CRC or advanced colorectal neoplasm which includes qFIT, age ,sex, CRC family history and so on.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Explore the cost-benefit ratio of one or two-sample of qFIT.6 monthExplore the cost-benefit ratio of one or two-sample of qFIT.
Explore the reason of false positive of qFIT6 monthCalculate false positive rate of the 4 kind of FOBTs. and count the case number of inflammatory bowel disease, colonic diverticulitis, hemorrhoids, upper gastrointestinal disease or medical factors that cause false positive of qFIT.
Explore the effect of aspirin or other anticoagulants to the diagnose accuracy of qFIT6 monthCount sensitivity and specificity with or without patients who take aspirin or other anticoagulants.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026