Skip to content

Extracapsular Arthroscopic Treatment for Refractory Tennis Elbow--Mid-and-short Term Retrospective Study of 50 Cases

Extracapsular Arthroscopic Treatment for Refractory Tennis Elbow--Mid-and-short Term Retrospective Study of 50 Cases

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04454047
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-07-01
Start date
2017-05-20
Completion date
2018-06-26
Last updated
2020-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow

Keywords

Refractory tennis elbow, Arthroscopy, Intracapsular method, Extracapsular method, Surgical technology

Brief summary

This study retrospectively analysed surgical outcomes of consecutive 50 cases to investigate the technical standard and clinical effect of extracapsular arthroscopic treatment for refractory tennis elbow.

Detailed description

To investigate the technical standard of extracapsular arthroscopic treatment for refractory tennis elbow. Consecutive 50 cases of refractory tennis elbow from 50 patients who underwent extracapsular arthroscopic surgery which performed independently by the same doctor from March 2012 to November 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. The key points of technical standard were summarized, including debridement, decortication and microfracture, suture under arthroscopy and postoperative cast fixation. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), Mayo elbow performance score and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure (DASH) were evaluated for postoperative results. The effects of various technical points were analyzed by rank sum test, independent sample t test, χ2 test and multiple logistic regression.

Interventions

Extracapsular arthroscopy method was used to treat refractory tennis elbow

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis was refractory tennis elbow; 2. Standard extracapsular method was used for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient had past history of joint infection, joint tuberculosis, or osteomyelitis, or the upper limb had undergone surgery within the past 6 months; 2. Diagnosis was combined with severe heart, brain, kidney, or another organ dysfunction; 3. Case was complicated with other serious elbow joint diseases or injuries; 4. Patient did not sign the informed consent form.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mayo Elbow Performance Score24 monthsUse Mayo Elbow Performance Score(MEPS) to evaluate the functional recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. MEPS ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.
Visual Analog Scale24 monthsUse Visual Analog Scale(VAS) to evaluate the pain recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. VAS ranges from 0 to 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score24 monthsUse Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand(DASH) score to evaluate the functional and pain recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment. DASH ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Activity of Daily Life recovery time24 monthsUse Activity of Daily Life(ADL) recovery time to evaluate the functional recovery of patients who received extracapsular arthroscopic treatment.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026