Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Deep Brain Stimulation, Lateral Hypothalamic Area, Feeding Behaviors, Energy Balance
Brief summary
This is a pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) as a treatment for chronic refractory obesity. This study will include 6 individuals with chronic refractory obesity, that have failed other treatments including gastric bypass surgery.
Detailed description
Six (N = 6) subjects with chronic refractory obesity will receive bilateral DBS implants in the LHA using the Boston Scientific Vercise Gevia DBS system. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of DBS of the LHA using the current-driven Boston Scientific device and compare that to the safety data for our previous pilot using the voltage-driven DBS system for the treatment of chronic refractory obesity. The primary efficacy objective is to determine if DBS of the LHA can affect energy balance (i.e. energy intake and/or energy expenditure) in these patients. Secondary outcomes include quality of life outcomes and changes in feeding behaviors. Study participants will undergo a two-part DBS implantation procedure for placement of DBS electrodes in the LHA. Following this procedure, subjects with complete resting metabolic rate (RMR) testing to determine the optimal settings for the LHA stimulation. If effective, DBS technology might offer severely obese adults (BMI of ≥50 kg/m2), who have failed traditional therapy, a non-destructive, adaptable, reversible neurosurgical option for altering eating habits leading to sustained weight loss in the long-term.
Interventions
DEVICEDBS of the LHA
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Lateral Hypothalamic Area
Sponsors
Boston Scientific Corporation
donald whiting
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female patients age ≥ 22 years and \< 65 years old with a BMI of ≥ 40 kg/m2. 2. Failure of bariatric surgery (gastric bypass) and subjects who have no endoscopically or surgically correctable causes for failed bariatric surgery. Failed bariatric surgery is determined using the modified Reinhold classification as patients who are currently more than 50% over ideal body weight at least 24 months after a technically successful surgery (as confirmed by a esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within the 6 months prior to ICF). 3. Stable at their present weight (+/- 3 kg) for a 12-month period. 4. Neuropsychiatric evaluation must not reveal any issues that will be an impediment to subject's participation (as listed in
Exclusion criteria
2, 3 and 4). 5. Karnofsky Performance Score \>60. 6. Platelet count \>125,000 per cubic mm. 7. Prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety - Complication Rates | 12 months | Adverse Events |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Energy intake | 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Assessment of energy intake through ad libitum test meals |
| Impact of weight on quality of life: IWQOL-Lite | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite). \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 31 items by which the subject will respond to statements under 5 domains. Responses include: Always true, Usually true, Sometimes true, Rarely true, and Never true. All responses are totaled for a final score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best quality of life. |
| Binge Eating Scale (BES) | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Eating Habits Checklist/Binge Eating Scale (BES). \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 16 items that subjects will respond to. Each question has 3-4 separate responses assigned a numerical value. The score range is from 0-46. Higher scores equate to greater binging behavior. |
| Yale Food Addiction Scale | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Yale Food Addiction Scale. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 25 self-reported questions in dichotomous and Likert-type format. Food addiction is recognized when a subject meets at least three of the symptom criteria. The more symptoms met, the more severe the food addiction. |
| Power of Food Scale | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Power of Food Scale. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 21 items that subjects will assign a response to. The scale is as follows: 1=I don't agree at all, 2=I agree a little, 3=I agree somewhat, 4=I agree, 5=I strongly agree. All items are scored so that a higher item score indicates a greater responsiveness to the food environment. |
| Eating inventory | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Eating Inventory (EI). \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 51 items consisting of three subscales. Scores range from a minimum of 0-0-0 to a maximum of 21-16-14. Higher scores are indicative of a greater level of the eating habits for the respective subscales. |
| Body shape perception | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 34 items that subjects will assign a response to. The scale is as follows: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Very Often, 6=Always. The maximum score is 204, and a higher score indicates more dissatisfaction and discomfort with the body experience. |
| Food craving inventory | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Food Craving Inventory. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. For each of the foods listed (37), subjects will rate the frequency of cravings. The scale is as follows: A=Never, B=Rarely (once or twice), C=Sometimes, D=Often, E=Always/almost every day. Cravings are measured for five types of foods. A total score is also obtained that measures the general construct of food cravings. Higher scores are indicative of more intense cravings. |
| Resting metabolic rate (RMR) | Baseline, 2 months, 4-5 months and 20 months post-surgery | RMR assessment of energy expenditure |
| Delayed reward discounting | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Monetary Choice Questionnaire. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. There are 21 items that subjects will indicate a response. The scale is as follows: 0=smaller reward today, 1=larger reward in the specified number of days. The questionnaire is scored by calculating where the respondent's answers place them amid reference discounting curves, where placement amid steeper curves indicates higher levels of impulsivity. |
| Appetitive sensations | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Visual analog scale (VAS) assessment. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. Subjects will rank appetitive sensations on a scale from 0-10. |
| Quality of life measure: SF-36 | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Short Form-36 (SF-36). Subjects will rate responses to each of 36 items, (Likert and yes/no responses). Scores for each scale range from 0-100. The lower the score the more disability. |
| Depression score | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). There are 21 items where subjects will rate their responses on a Likert scale from 0-3. Total scores range from 0-63. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. |
| Changes in metabolic hormone profiles | 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Biochemical battery of tests. Blood draw for GLP1, PYY, Ghrelin (total and active) - Fasting |
| Body mass index | Baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, 4-5 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 20 months and 24 months post-surgery | Body Mass Index (BMI) |
| Change in DXA body composition | 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Change in body composition. Measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan |
| Food preferences | Baseline, 2 months and 4-5 months post-surgery | Food Preference Questionnaire. \[Feeding behavior assessment\]. Subjects rate their liking of 62 individual foods on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale is as follows: 1=Dislike a lot, 2=Dislike a little, 3=Neither like nor dislike, 4=Like a little, 5=Like a lot. Higher scores indicate a higher preference. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed