Skip to content

A Communication Enhancing Intervention to Improve Patients' Perception of Physiotherapy Consultations

A Communication Enhancing Intervention to Improve Patients' Perception of Physiotherapy Consultations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04452903
Enrollment
558
Registered
2020-07-01
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2020-12-20
Last updated
2021-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Communication

Keywords

communication skills, Consultation reassurance questionnaire

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of a single training session in communication skills at improving patients' perceptions of physiotherapy consultations.

Detailed description

Population: Physiotherapists Detail: Physiotherapists (n=30) who work at 'Clalit' institute's (public health management organization in Israel) at four physiotherapy clinics. Intervention: A single session of training in consultation-based communication skills Detail: a 3-hour communication skill workshop, followed by a month-long period to assimilate and implement the new set of skills, with supervision available by phone from the trainers. Comparison: No training Detail: The control group receives no extra training. Outcome: New patients' perception of consultations Detail: The Primary Outcome Measure is the Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire (CRQ) The CRQ measures patients' perceptions of consultation. It consists of four subscales, each with three items: data-gathering, relationship-building, generic reassurance, and cognitive reassurance. The investigators are assessing change between two-time points (before and after the intervention). And also, the difference between study groups. This is collected twice: at baseline, and at follow up, from the intervention and control groups. Type of Question: therapy Detail: The study tests whether a single training sessions can improve communication in consultations with physiotherapists. Type of Study: RCT Detail: Stage 1: Pre-randomization: The physiotherapists (n=30) will hand out a Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire (CRQ) in a sealed envelope to each eligible patient (age 18+) they receive for the first consultation in two weeks period. The patient will complete the questionnaire in private, post consultation, and place it in a closed box. The physiotherapist will recruit a minimum of five patients each (n\>150). Baseline measures are: age, gender, pain area, chronicity, pain severity, disability, satisfaction from the consultation and the Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire. Stage 2: Randomization: The process for randomization: First, participating physiotherapists will be matched for gender, seniority, and quality of reassurance in every clinic. They will then be allocated into one of the two arms at random (1:1), according to a computer random number list. Stage 3: Follow up: After the intervention, both the intervention and control groups will again hand out the questionnaires (age, gender, pain area, chronicity, pain severity, disability, satisfaction from the consultation and the CRQ) to new eligible patients that arrive for the first consultation. The physiotherapist will recruit a minimum of ten patients each (total sample therefore n\> 300, minimum number per arm=150). sample size The sample size was calculated with G\*Power 3.1.9.4 using the t-test family to detect the difference between two independent means (two groups). The input parameters were as follows: for a two-tailed test, assuming a medium effect size of 0.5, α=0.05, and β=0.95, the total sample size recommended was 210 participants. One hundred five participants in each study group (intervention and control).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcommunication skills

3-hour communication skill workshop, followed by a month-long period to assimilate and implement the new set of skills, with supervision available by phone from the trainers.

Sponsors

Ariel University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The participant (patients of the physiotherapists) are unaware of the intervention. The outcome assessor will not know who was in the intervention group and who was in the control

Intervention model description

A randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Physiotherapists: * Working for Clalit Health Services. Dan-Petach Tikva region * Willing to participate in a 3-hour communication skills workshop * Patients: * over the age of 18 * literate in Hebrew * Willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling to participate in the trial * Illiterate in Hebrew

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Consultation reassurance questionnaire (0-72). Change is being assess before and after the intervention.measure assessing change between two time points: base line and at two month.A questionnaire that measures patients' perceptions of consultation- higher values represent a better communication skills

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The numeric pain rating scale (0-10)2 monthFor the most severe and average pain intensity ( 0= no pain and 10 =the worst pain)
Disability (0-10)2 monthFor disability (0= no disability and 10 =the worst disability)
Satisfaction (0-10)2 monthFor satisfaction from the first consultation with the physiotherapist (0= no satisfied at all and 10 =very satisfied)

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026