Skip to content

Glycemic Stability During the Intraoperative Period Among Patients With DM Undergoing CABG Surgery

Glycemic Stability During the Intraoperative Period Among Patients With DM Undergoing CABG Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04451655
Enrollment
72
Registered
2020-06-30
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2020-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Glucose

Brief summary

Objectives: Intraoperative glycemic stability and control among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remains a significant concern. In this study, the intraoperative glycemic stability among diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery was compared between patients who received an intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control with those who received an CII for conventional glycemic control, during the intraoperative period. Research Design and Methods: This study implemented a quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 144 patients with DM undergoing CABG surgery at a major hospital in Amman, Jordan.

Detailed description

Objectives: Intraoperative glycemic stability and control among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remains a significant concern. In this study, the intraoperative glycemic stability among diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery was compared between patients who received an intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control with those who received an CII for conventional glycemic control, during the intraoperative period. Research Design and Methods: This study implemented a quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 144 patients with DM undergoing CABG surgery at a major hospital in Amman, Jordan. Participants were randomly assigned to either a tight glycemic control group (n=72) or a conventional glycemic control group (n=72). Patients who received the tight glycemic control protocol had significantly more consistent and lower mean intraoperative BG levels than those who received the conventional glycemic control protocol. The tight glycemic control protocol resulted in significantly lower BG levels and fewer variations across each time-point and more consistent and stable BG levels than the conventional glycemic control protocol.

Interventions

This study aims to explore the hypothesis that diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery receiving intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control (110-149 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period would have improved intraoperative glycemic stability, efficacy and consistency compared to patients receiving conventional glycemic control (150-180 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period

Sponsors

Audai A. Hayajneh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
43 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult Jordanian patients * diagnosed with DM * who had been scheduled to CABG surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who were immunosuppressed were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative glycemic instabilityevery half hour for eight hoursIntraoperative glycemic instability is defined as three consecutive readings of intraoperative blood glucose (BG) levels outside the pre-set targeted ranges of the protocols, whether higher or lower than the limits

Countries

Jordan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026