Skip to content

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Compared to Stereotactic Navigated Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Compared to Stereotactic Navigated Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04450797
Acronym
NaVPS
Enrollment
136
Registered
2020-06-30
Start date
2020-02-26
Completion date
2025-01-06
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt (VPS)

Keywords

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS)-dependency, VPS placement, Stereotactic Navigated Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement, Ultrasound Guided (US-G) Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement

Brief summary

This study is to prospectively compare Ultrasound guided (US-G) Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt (VPS) placement to stereotactic navigation in a randomized controlled fashion with the surgical intervention time as primary outcome. All patients entering the University Hospital of Basel for elective or emergent VPS surgery will be randomized in 1:1 fashion to one of the study groups at admission or the day before the operation.

Detailed description

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent procedures in neurosurgical practice. The position of the proximal ventricular catheter is important since it influences possible malfunction of the VPS. For the improvement of accuracy in proximal VPS placement, navigation-based insertion techniques have been developed. VPS placement using stereotactic navigation has shown a high accuracy of catheter placement been developed. VPS placement using stereotactic navigation has shown a high accuracy of catheter placement, while the main limitations are that for referencing, the head of the patient needs to be fixed in a head holder and the preoperative set-up can be time-consuming. US-G VPS placement using a burr hole probe was described as an alternate for image-guided VPS placement technique. For US-G VPS placement head fixation or preoperative registration is not needed. This study is to prospectively compare Ultrasound guided (US-G) Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt (VPS) placement to stereotactic navigation in a randomized controlled fashion with the surgical intervention time as primary outcome.

Interventions

DEVICEUS -G VPS placement, done by BK Medical 5000 US with burr hole probe (type 9063 N11C5S, 11-5 MHz).

US -G VPS placement, done by BK Medical 5000 US with burr hole probe (type 9063 N11C5S, 11-5 MHz). Head not fixed, placed on horseshoe head holder, no preoperative navigation planning, catheter will be cut in length after positioning under real-time US guidance.

DEVICEStereotactic navigation for VPS placement (Brainlab Dual Curve System with cranial navigation software version 3.1).

Stereotactic navigation for VPS placement (Brainlab Dual Curve System with cranial navigation software version 3.1). Head fixed in head clamp, entry point, trajectory and catheter length planned based on preoperative computer tomography imaging, catheter placed using navigated stylet.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The primary outcome is the surgical intervention time, recorded by blinded anaesthesiologists. Some of the secondary outcomes (catheter placement (optimal vs. not optimal, grade I to IV), volumetry of side ventricles, Evans' Index) are measured by a blinded neuroradiologist.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent as documented by signature * Patients undergoing elective or emergent VPS placement (frontal or occipital shunt )

Exclusion criteria

* Revision surgery due to former VPS placement using the same side and location for VPS placement or when no complete shunt is revised (proximal and distal), resulting in a shorter operation time * Ventriculoatrial or ventriculopleural Placement * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study * Previous enrolment into the current study * Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
surgical intervention time (minutes)at Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours)time spent in the Operating Room (OR) by the surgeon, includes preparation time together (patient positioning, head clamping in the stereotactic navigation group) with the operation time of the neurosurgical part. Beginning (positioning) and ending (suture neurosurgical part) of this time interval is clearly defined and will be in a standardized manner recorded by blinded anaesthesiologists. . In the stereotactic navigation group, an additional 5 minutes will be added to the surgical intervention time for the preplanning of the navigation the day before the operation on the Brainlab workstation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anaesthesia time (minutes)at Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours)Anaesthesia time (minutes): time in minutes from start anaesthesia to end anaesthesia
Number of puncture attemptsat Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours)Number of puncture attempts
Catheter placement (optimal vs. not optimal)at Operation day (V2,up to 24 hours), 2-3 days post-op. (V3), at discharge (V 4, approx. 7 days postop.), 6-8 weeks post-op (V5),6 months postop. (V6)Optimal catheter Placement: free-floating within the Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) without touching ventricle wall or septum pellucidum, and the tip of the catheter located at the foramen of Monro showing an optimal length of the catheter. Catheters that did not fulfill all criteria have been defined as not optimal placed. Positioning of catheters will be further graded according to Yim et al. into grades I to IV (grade I: catheter terminates in the ipsilateral frontal horn, grade II: catheter terminates in contralateral frontal horn, grade III: catheter terminates in non-targeted CSF spaces, grade IV: catheter terminates intraparenchymally)
Change in volumetry of side ventricles1 day before Operation day (V1, up to 24 hours) and 2-3 days post-op. (V3)Change in volumetry of side ventricles pre- and postoperatively in cm3 (number and relative change)
Operation time (minutes)at Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours)Operation time (minutes): time in minutes from cut to suture
rate of complications (infection, bleeding, complications associated with navigation method)from Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours) until 6 months postop. (V6)rate of complications (infection, bleeding, complications associated with navigation method)
mortalityfrom Operation day (V2, up to 24 hours) until 6 months postop. (V6)mortality
revision surgery (yes/no)from Operation day (V2,up to 24 hours) until 6 months postop. (V6)revision surgery (yes/no)
Change in Evan's Indexbefore Operation day (V1) and 2-3 days post-op. (V3)Change in Evan's Index pre- and postoperatively (number and relative change).The Evans' index is the ratio of maximum width of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles and the maximal internal diameter of the skull at the same level employed in axial CT images.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 28, 2026