Skip to content

Tai Chi/Qigong for Subsyndromal Depression and Cognition in Older Age Bipolar Disorder

Efficacy of Tai Chi/Qigong for Subsyndromal Depression and Cognition in Older Age Bipolar Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With an Active Control

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04450147
Enrollment
23
Registered
2020-06-29
Start date
2020-11-10
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2025-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder

Keywords

mindfulness, older age bipolar disorder, tai chi, qigong, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

It is expected that by 2030, the percentage of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) in Canada over 60 years of age will exceed 50%. In this population, poor cognition and persistent sub-threshold depressive symptoms are particularly common, difficult to treat, associated with increased mood episodes, and poor daily functioning. Mind-body interventions have increasingly been found to be effective in treating several psychiatric condition including BD. A few pilot studies examining mindfulness-based intervention in younger adult BD have been promising for depressive symptoms, but some pilot research suggest that patients with older age bipolar disorder (OABD) may benefit more from moving mindfulness. The investigators will conduct a 12-week randomized controlled trial to assess whether tai-chi/qigong will be associated with 1) greater reduction in depressive symptoms, and 2) greater improved cognition, in comparison to a light exercise active control condition, 12- and 24-weeks from baseline, in BD patients aged 40+.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTai Chi/Qigong vs. Walking/Stretching

Both interventions can be thought of as a form of movement and exercise.

Sponsors

Lady Davis Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged greater than or equal to 40 years * history of diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder * access to a computer with a functioning camera, microphone, and ability to run Zoom software * English or French speaking * ability to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Young Mania Rating Scale score \> 5 * current clinician diagnosis of substance abuse, unless currently in complete remission * risk of suicide as assessed by a score above 3 on item 10 of Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale * participation or plan to participate in any other concurrent psychosocial group program during course of study * unstable psychiatric medication (less than 4-weeks since commencement)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in DepressionBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksLevel of depression as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-60, higher score indicates worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Processing SpeedBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksProcessing speed as measured by the Animal Fluency Test at 12-weeks and 24-weeks. Scored by number of animals named, higher score indicates better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Generalized AnxietyBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksGeneralized anxiety as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-21, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in MindfulnessBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksMindfulness as measured by the Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range = 49-110, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in Self-CompassionBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksSelf-compassion as measured by the Self Compassion Scale Short Form at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-130, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in Quality of LifeBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksQuality of life as measured by the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder Questionnaire - Short Form, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 12-60, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in Self-Reported DepressionBaseline, weekly throughout 12-weeks, 24-weeksLevel of depression as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-45, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in Self-Reported ManiaBaseline, weekly throughout 12-weeks, 24-weeksLevel of mania as measured by the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-25, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in ManiaBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksMania as measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-60, higher score indicates worse outcome
Change in Daily FunctioningBaseline, 12-weeks, 24-weeksDaily functioning as measured by the Functional Assessment Short Test, at 12-weeks and 24-weeks post-intervention. Possible score range: 0-72, higher score indicates worse outcome

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026