Skip to content

Bicarbonated Ringer's Solution Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution in Patients With Septic Shock

Fluid Resuscitation Management for Patients With Septic Shock: the Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Bicarbonated Ringer's Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04449757
Enrollment
260
Registered
2020-06-29
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2020-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock, Fluid Resuscitation, Crystalloid Solution, Intensive Care Unit

Keywords

septic shock, fluid resuscitation, crystalloid solution, intensive care unit

Brief summary

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, investigators aim to study the effects and safety of bicarbonated Ringer's solution in patients with septic shock compared with lactated ringer's solution, and provide evidence for current fluid resuscitation strategies for septic shock.

Detailed description

Although the latest guidelines recommend crystalloids as the first choice for the patients' fluid resuscitation, it still remains controversial that which crystalloid solution is the best choice. It is reported that balanced crystalloid can result in better outcomes than saline for critically ill patients. However, there are few studies conducted between different crystalloid solutions. Lactated ringer's solution is the longest-used crystalloid solution. Compared with lactated ringer's solution whose anion is lactate, the anion of bicarbonate ringer's solution is bicarbonate. And lactate needs to be metabolized into bicarbonate through the mitochondria of the liver before it can play an alkalization role. Therefore, in theory, bicarbonate ringer's solution does not need to rely on liver metabolism, the onset time to maintain acid-base balance is shorter, and it may be more suitable for patients with severe acidosis. In patients with septic shock, the incidence of moderate to severe metabolic is increased. Bicarbonate ringer's solution can directly supplement the concentration of bicarbonate, while lactated ringer's solution needs to take time and be metabolized in the liver. Thus, we hypothesize that bicarbonate ringer's solution is more effective for patients with shock and metabolic acidosis than lactated ringer's solution.

Interventions

DRUGBicarbonated Ringer's solution

Method of administration: intravenous infusion; 500-1000ml each time; Speed of infusion: it is decided by the clinicians.

Method of administration: intravenous infusion; 500-1000ml each time; Speed of infusion: it is decided by the clinicians.

Sponsors

Zhongnan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. At the age of 18 to 75; * 2\. Being treated in the ICU; * 3\. Diagnosed as septic shock according tho the definition of Sepsis 3.0 with fluid resuscitation requirement.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Severe hepatic failure; * 2\. Possible brain injury; * 3\. With absolute contraindications for central vena catheterization; * 4\. Ever participated in another clinical trial within 30 days prior enrollment; * 5\. Have corrected metabolic acidosis through alkaline drug application within 24 hours prior to enrollment; * 6\. Hypermagnesemia or hypothyroidism; * 7\. Pregnant of breast-feeding women; * 8\. Considered inevitable death; * 9\. Other situations where investigators think enrollment is not appropriate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the average doses of vasopressorsFrom the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate <2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. About 24 hours.total doses of norepinephrine÷weight÷duration of usage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
total volume of fluids before hemodynamic stabilizationFrom the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate <2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. About 24 hours.total volume of bicarbonated ringers/lactated ringers before hemodynamic stabilization
the change of serum lactate value at the 6th hour6 hoursserum lactate (6h) - serum lactate (0h)
the PH value0, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hoursthe potencial of hydrogen of arterial blood
shock reversal timeFrom the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate <2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. About 24 hours.From the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate \<2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs
the proportion of patients whose serum lactate decreases 30%From the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate <2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. About 24 hours.the proportion of patients whose serum lactate decreases 30%
mortality from any causeon the day28 after enrollmentthe rate of death from any cause within 28 days after enrollment
the rate of metabolic alkalosisFrom the onset of shock to the first blood pressure stabilization (MAP≥65mmHg), or serum lactate <2.2mmol/l, or discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. About 24 hours.the percentage of metabolic alkalosis (PH\>7.45 and HCO3\>26mmol/L)
the BE value0, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hoursthe base excess of arterial blood

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026