Hemiplegia
Conditions
Keywords
Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT), Intensive Visual Simulation3 (IVS3), Vibration, Vibrasens, Upper limb rehabilitation, Stroke, Hemiplegic
Brief summary
Two movement illusion techniques can currently be used in clinical practice for motor rehabilitation after stroke hemiplegia: visual illusion (mirror therapy) and proprioceptive illusion (tendon vibration). Mirror therapy, in its computerized version (IVS3, Dessintey, Saint-Etienne, France), is based on the substitution of the deficient visual feedback by a visual feedback of a correctly realized movement. The proprioceptive illusion is based on the external application of a vibrator on muscle tendons at a frequency between 50 and 120 Hz. These two techniques are currently used independently. They are, in theory, complementary and additive. No study has described the combinatorial properties of the illusions generated by these 2 techniques in hemiplegic subjects and healthy subjects.
Detailed description
The study hypothesis is that the administration of mirror therapy together with vibration will increase the perception of movement in a subjective scale.
Interventions
Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) will be realizing by the device Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3). The patient looks on a screen in front of him, mirroring the movements made by his hand, while attempting to perform the same movement with his other hand.
DEVICETendon vibration
Transcutaneous vibrations are used. This device allows vibrations from 50 to 120 Hz with amplitude of 1 mm. This study the frequency used is 70 and 80 Hz.
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Hemiplegic subjects : * Male or female * Aged 18 to 70 years, * First ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke causing hemiplegic * Having signed the written consent * Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme Healthy subjects : * Male or female, aged 18 to 70 years, * Matched in sex, age and laterally with hemiplegic subjects * Having signed the written consent * Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
Exclusion criteria
Hemiplegic subjects : * With complete lesion of the primary motor cortex * With an addiction to alcohol or drugs * With psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, uncontrolled disease/epilepsy, malignant illness severe kidney or lung disease * With history of associated general disabling disease * With cerebellar syndrome * With clinical brain stem involvement * Under legal protection * Pregnant or breastfeeding women Healthy subjects : * Neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal diseases * Taking medication that can affect attention * Unable to understand instructions of the study * Under legal protection * Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline impression of movement at day 7 | Day: 0, 7 | Measured impression of movement on conditions (visual and/or proprioceptive; yes/no/don't know) |
| subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline nature of this impression at day 7 | Day: 0, 7 | Measured nature of this impression of movement (flexion/extension) |
| subjective measure of the intensity of the perception of movements: change from baseline intensity of the movement felt at day 7 | Day: 0, 7 | Measured intensity of the movement felt by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results (0 = no sense of movement and 10 = like real movement.) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score with the Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score | Day: 0 | Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score evaluated the level of sensory impairment. The Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) includes 2 subscales: somatosensory score (min 0 and max 44) and stereognosis (min 0 and max 20) for left and right members. |
| Objective measurement of the perceived movement angle reproduced without motor intention by the hemiplegic subjects with the healthy limb | Day: 0, 7 | Measured by Kinovea software. |
| Brain activity according to different experimental conditions (with and without vibration or with and without visual illusion) in hemiplegic subjects. | Day: 0, 7 | Multi Channel EEG Acquisition System |
| Intensity of the perception of movements using a visual analogue scale and the objective measurement of perceived movement angle reproduced by the healthy subjects with the vibrated arm | Day: 0, 7 | Measured by Kinovea software. |
| Measurement of motor intention in hemiplegic subjects by experimental conditions | Day: 0, 7 | Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results (0 = no sense of movement and 10 = like real movement). |
| To compare the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score according to the level of motor impairment | Day: 0 | Level of motor impairment is measured by Medical Research Council (MRC) score. Medical Research Council (MRC) score evaluate motricity (0= paralyzed). |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed