Skip to content

The Effectiveness in the Treatment of Long Bone Defect Using 3D-printed Implant

The Effectiveness in the Treatment of Long Bone Defect in Adults Using 3D-printed Titanium Alloy Implant

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04449211
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-06-26
Start date
2023-10-06
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss, Defect Limb

Keywords

bone defect, 3D-printed Titanium alloy implant, Electron Beam Melting, customised implant, patient-specific implant

Brief summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed titanium alloy implants in the treatment of long bone defect in adults

Detailed description

The participant with long bone defect or bone tumor of the extremity is referred to the Radiology Department to have a full CT-scan of both limbs to facilitate the later reconstruction. With the contralateral limb CT-scan data, the implant is designed with appropriate geometry and structures through online meetings with the scientists of CSIRO, Australia. Through this discussion, the supporting guides for the precise osteotomy will also be designed and would be 3D-printed later by 3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) with Poly Lactic Acid material. The 3D-printed metal parts will be manufactured using Titanium - 6 Aluminum - 4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) material with Electron Beam Melting technology in CSIRO (Australia). Subsequently, the 3D-printed part will undergo mechanical tests using the Instron 5500R system (Australia) to validate its required mechanical properties. If this metal part cannot fulfill the mechanical requirements, the problematic geometry will be revised and re-designed. Another prototype will be 3D-printed with the same protocol and be tested until it qualified for the mechanical requirement. When the 3D-printed model passes the mechanical test, another 3D-printed metal part with a similar design will be manufactured before transferring to 3-Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) for post-processing, surface finishing, sterilising, packaging, labeling. Eventually, the implant will be sent to Cho Ray hospital. The amount of intraoperative blood loss and operative time will be recorded.

Interventions

Reconstructing the long bone defect with 3D-printed customised Titanium alloy implant

Sponsors

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cho Ray Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective participants with health insurance admitted to the Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department of Cho Ray hospital who get the diagnosis of bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants with health insurance regardless of sex having bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection agree to participate the research

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with contraindication to surgery * Participants do not agree to undergo surgery * Participants with local infection or soft tissue defect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional outcome of the upper limb1 to 12 monthsFor the participant with bone defect of the upper limb, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Functional outcome of the lower limb1 to 12 monthsFor the participant with bone defect of the lower limb, the Karlstrom & Olerud score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is graded as: bad, fair, good, excellent functional outcome.
Radiological imagingPost-operative day 1 to 12 monthsthe bone healing process is evaluated by the change in dual energy CT-scan result

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complicationsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year.Rate of complications

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

Primary ContactHung Do Phuoc, MD, PhD
dphungcr@ump.edu.vn+84903775579
Backup ContactPhu Nguyen Hoang, MD, MSc
nguyenhoangphu@ump.edu.vn+84938689292

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026