Skip to content

Meta-Analysis on Damage Control Surgery in Patients With Non-Traumatic Abdominal Emergencies

Damage-Control Surgery in Patients With Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04448912
Enrollment
2170
Registered
2020-06-26
Start date
2018-04-30
Completion date
2021-04-24
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Damage Control Surgery, Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies

Brief summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of damage-control surgery on mortality in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Literature search will be conducted using PubMed. Two meta-analyses will be performed comparing (1) mortality in patients with non-trauma damage control surgery vs. non-trauma conventional surgery and (2) the observed vs. expected mortality rate in patients undergoing non-trauma damage-control surgery.

Detailed description

After the successful implementation in trauma patients, damage control surgery (DCS) is being increasingly used in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies, too. However, non-trauma DCS is an ongoing matter of debate as the open abdomen treatment typically performed in DCS is a non-anatomical situation and associated with potentially severe side effects. To date, DCS in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies has not yet been comprehensively assessed in meta-analysis. A systematic literature search will be conducted using the National Library of Medicine's Medline database (PubMed). The search strategy will be based on the PICOS process. Original research articles in English language addressing (1) mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS vs. non-trauma conventional surgery or (2) the observed vs. expected mortality in non-trauma DCS will be included. Two meta-analyses will be performed, comparing (1) mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS vs. non-trauma conventional surgery and (2) the observed vs. expected mortality rate in patients undergoing non-trauma DCS based on outcome prediction scores. Meta-analysis will be performed using a random-effects model. The estimated effect size for mortality will be reported as risk difference with 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis will be performed by repeating the analysis in the subgroups of studies with the same study design and studies that applied the same outcome prediction score.

Interventions

Surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies using the damage control approach

PROCEDUREConventional surgery

Conventional surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Articles on damage control surgery in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies * Reported in-hospital or 30-day mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma damage control surgery vs non-trauma conventional surgery or * Reported observed in-hospital or 30-day mortality vs expected mortality in patients undergoing non-trauma damage control surgery * Articles published from 2000 to 2020 * Articles including patients older than 18 years * Original research articles * Articles in English language

Exclusion criteria

* Articles describing trauma patients exclusively * Articles describing pediatric patients (age below or equal to 18 years)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityFrom hospital admission to discharge, expected to be up to 4 weeksDeath after surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026