Skip to content

Prospective Trial of Dexamethasone implAnt for Treatment Naïve diabeTic Macular Edema

Prospective Trial of Dexamethasone implAnt for Treatment Naïve diabeTic Macular Edema: The Multicenter DANTE Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04448496
Acronym
DANTE
Enrollment
49
Registered
2020-06-26
Start date
2020-06-22
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Retinopathy

Brief summary

The purpose of the investigator's study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the pro re nata (PRN) regimen to 12 months by using intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with treatment-naive diabetic macular edema patients.

Detailed description

Pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME) involves inflammation, angiogenesis, and oxidative stress processes provoked mainly by cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, 8, and monocyte chemotactic protein, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Vision loss associated with diabetic retinopathy is most commonly caused by DME, which affects approximately 7% of all diabetic patients. Several therapeutic options are available for treating DME. Evidence for the use of these therapies is accumulating; however, the optical treatment choice remains unclear. In recent years, using intravitreal anti-VEGF agents to treat DME has been shown to be beneficial. Anti-VEGF injections are generally considered suitable first-line therapy for center-involved DME and are effective in improving visual acuity (VA), with 10% to 40% of patients achieving significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 1 year of treatment. The management of DME is complex, and often multiple treatment approaches are needed. Although anti-VEGF agents were effective for the treatment of DME, there is a proportion of patients who do not achieve optimal response to these agents, presenting refractory or persistent DME. Intravitreal administration of steroids for the treatment of DME has also been studied for many years due to their well-known, widespread, anti-inflammatory effects. Dexamethasone implant is a slow-release dexamethasone delivery system developed for intravitreal administration that has recently been introduced as a therapeutic option in DME.

Interventions

Dexamethasone 0.7mg is injected into the vitreous cavity through the pars plana using applicator for diabetic macular edema.

Sponsors

Yeungnam University College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and females 18 years of age or older 2. Written informed consent has been obtained 3. Diabetic macular edema with a central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 300um measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. 4. Treatment-naïve subjects for diabetic macular edema. 5. Documented BCVA of ETDRS letter score of 23 to 73 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/320 to 20/40) in the study eye.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye 2. Any prior or concomitant ocular treatment (e.g. anti-VEGF therapy, corticosteroids) in the study eye for diabetic macular edema 3. Prior systemic anti-VEGF or corticosteroid therapy, investigational or approved, within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study 4. Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye at any time or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within 12 months prior to Day 1 5. Elevated intraocular pressure or a history of steroid-induced ocular hypertension 6. The presence of other retinopathies, maculopathies, visually significant cataract, vitreomacular traction, peripheral ischemia, history of pars plana vitrectomy 7. Any active intraocular, extraocular, and periocular inflammation or infection in either eye within 4 weeks of screening 8. Any history of allergy to povidone iodine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean change of best corrected visual acuityFrom baseline to month 6The mean change of best corrected visual acuity from baseline to Month 6 in early treatment diabetic retinopathy (ETDRS) letter score by using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) chart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean change in central macular thicknessFrom baseline to month 6 and 12The mean change in central macular thickness (um) by using optical coherence tomography
Mean number of injectionsFrom baseline to month 12The mean number of injections
Mean change of best corrected visual acuityFrom baseline to month 12The change in mean best corrected visual acuity at baseline as measured by the early treatment diabetic retinopathy letter score by using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) chart
Proportion (%) of subjects who gain ≥ 15 letters in best corrected visual acuityCompared with baseline at month 6 and 12The proportion (%) of subjects who gain ≥ 15 letters in best corrected visual acuity on the early treatment diabetic retinopathy chart
Changes of total area (mm^2)of nonperfusion within the ETDRS grid using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiographyFrom baseline to month 12Changes of total area (mm\^2) of nonperfusion within the ETDRS grid using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography
Mean treatment interval between injectionsFrom baseline to month 12The mean treatment interval (weeks) between injections

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactMin Sagong, MD,PhD
msagong@ynu.ac.kr82-53-620-3443
Backup ContactSohee Shin
ey005@ymc.yu.ac.kr82-53-620-3877

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026