Skip to content

PC001- A Study to Evaluate the Usability of PointCheck

PC001 - Study to Evaluate the Usability of PointCheck, a Novel Optical Technology for Screening Non-Invasively Severe Neutropenia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04448301
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-06-25
Start date
2021-02-09
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms, Neutropenia

Keywords

Medical Device, Technology, Non-invasive

Brief summary

This a study about the usability of PointCheck a novel non-invasive technology for monitoring chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The study will include patients with cancer visiting the outpatient hematology clinic for their standard of care chemotherapy administration. A final sample size of 90 oncologic outpatients will be enrolled and studied with the technology. The main objective is to evaluate the usability of PointCheck. Secondary outcomes include a preliminary assessment of PointCheck diagnostic accuracy and precision. For this, study subjects will be tested twice with PointCheck during the same session and the usability in an at-home simulated environment by naïve users will be evaluated

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPointCheck

This is a usability study on PointCheck, a new technology to detect chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Leuko Labs, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to understand the purpose and risks of the study and to provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use confidential health information in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations. 2. Male or Female aged 18 years or above. 3. Diagnosed with a hematological (e.g., lymphoma, myeloma) or breast cancer. 4. Scheduled active treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy with an associated high/intermediate risk of neutropenia. 5. Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with amputations, congenital malformations, or any severe abnormalities of the hands as determined by the investigator. 2. Participants with a history of vasculitis, Raynaud syndrome, scleroderma, mixed connective tissue disease or any other rheumatologic systemic condition that could produce microcirculatory changes in the nailfold. 3. Participants with circulating tumour cells in previous or current lab determinations. 4. Participants with leukemia. 5. Participants with any condition producing significant tremor (e.g., essential tremor, Parkinson´s disease, dystonic tremor). 6. Inadequately medically controlled hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 and diastolic blood pressure \< 60mmHg). 7. Participants whose gold standard blood differential was obtained more than 120 minutes after the last evaluation with the medical device. 8. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study. 9. Other unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, make the subject unsuitable for enrolment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
System Usability Scale (0-100 higher scores indicates better usability)Up to three-weeksTo confirm the usability of the system using the System Usability Scale
PointCheck's UsabilityUp to two-weeksTo gather data with the ultimate goal of determining the usability of the proposed non-invasive method measured by the number of errors of correct videos acquired for analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PointCheck's AccuracyUp to three-weeksTo perform a exploratory analysis of PointCheck's accuracy (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) to detect severe neutropenia compared with the gold standard blood analysis method employed by Boston Medical Center core laboratory in the range between ≤500 and \>500 absolute neutrophil count/µL.
Number of participants with device-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0Up to three-weeksTo confirm PointCheck's safety determining the % of AEs and SAEs related to the device use.
PointCheck's UtilityUp to three-weeksTo evaluate the number of patients that had to be rescheduled because the sole presence of neutropenia and how many of them were correctly detected with PointCheck.
PointCheck's PrecisionUp to two-weeksTo perform an exploratory analysis of the precision of PointCheck's estimation of neutropenia status from two independent one-minute videos.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic performance for a second cutoffUp to three-weeksThe preliminary diagnostic accuracy to detect grade III neutropenia according to CTCAE V5 (\<1000 ANC/mm3) measured by the sensitivity and the specificity will be the evaluated with reference to the corresponding laboratory measures acquired.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026