Skip to content

Novel Cognitive Treatment Targets for Epidiolex in Sturge- Weber Syndrome

Novel Cognitive Treatment Targets for Epidiolex in Sturge- Weber Syndrome: A Phase II Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04447846
Enrollment
11
Registered
2020-06-25
Start date
2019-10-14
Completion date
2022-12-09
Last updated
2023-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sturge-Weber Syndrome

Keywords

Sturge-Weber Syndrome, SWS, Cognitive impairments

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand the utility of cannabidiol (CBD/ Epidiolex) for improving the treatment of cognitive impairments in Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS).

Detailed description

The investigators hope to gain an understanding of the utility of pharmaceutical grade CBD used for the treatment of cognitive impairments in SWS in this open-label study. Anecdotal evidence from a phase I trial investigating the use of CBD for medically refractory seizures suggests CBD may also have a beneficial effect on cognition, mood, and behavior. The investigators hypothesize that CBD/ Epidiolex will improve SWS brain function resulting in improved cognitive function, social interactions, mood, motor function and behavior, as well as reduced migraines. This is an open-label prospective oral drug trial of Epidiolex in 10 subjects. Assessments will be done at baseline and repeated after 6 months on study drug.

Interventions

DRUGCannabidiol

Initiation of treatment will begin with 5 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses. The dose will be increased by 5 mg/kg/day after seven days and then by 5 mg/kg/day every seven days up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/kg/day given.

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Faneca 66 Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Anne Comi, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants with Sturge-Weber syndrome brain involvement as defined on neuroimaging (n=10 subjects, male and female, ages 3 to 50 years of age) and the following: * Cognitive impairment defined as a cognitive neuroscore greater than or equal to 2 at screening. * Anti-epileptic, mood or behavioral drugs (if on) at stable doses for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to enrollment. * If present, VNS must be on stable setting for a minimum of 3 months prior to enrollment. * If on ketogenic or Atkins diet, must be on stable ratio for a minimum of 3 months prior to enrollment. * Previous subjects who fail at any point to meet continuation criteria and withdraw early may be considered for re-enrollment under new subject ID as long as the above inclusion criteria are met. The determination of whether to re-enroll will be made by the PI and sponsor on a case-by-case basis. Re-enrollment can occur no earlier than 4 weeks after the final, post-weaning follow-up visit under the old subject ID. * Written informed consent obtained from the patient or the patient's legal representative must be obtained prior to beginning treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions at randomization such as: 1. Liver disease such as cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, and chronic hepatitis (i.e. quantifiable HBV-DNA and/or positive HbsAg, quantifiable HCV-RNA) 2. Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose greater than 1.5 3. Active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled severe infections 4. Active, bleeding diathesis * Patients who have a major surgery or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study entry, patients who have not recovered from the side effects of any major surgery (defined as requiring general anesthesia), or patients that may require major surgery during the course of the study. * Patients who start or discontinue a seizure, mood or behavioral medication in the 4 weeks leading up to screening. * Prior treatment with any investigational drug or use of any other cannabis product within the preceding 4 weeks prior to study entry. * Patients with a history of non-compliance to medical regimens or who are considered potentially unreliable or will not be able to complete the entire study. This includes those in foster care, or those unable to keep follow-up appointments, maintain close contact with the Principal Investigator, or complete all necessary studies to maintain safety. * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of the female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
List Sorting Working Memory TestBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on cognitive function was collected using the List Sorting Working Memory Test from the NIH Toolbox. Data was collected on working memory performance, which was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seizure FrequencyBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Change in seizure frequency by seizure score at pre-treatment baseline and after six months. The seizure score is taken from the Sturge-Weber Neuroscore on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=1+. but controlled, 2=Breakthrough, 3=monthly, 4=Weekly+. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Migraine SeverityBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on migraine severity will be collected using patient responses to questions on a standard six-point scale. Data will be collected on the frequency of an event (e.g. feelings of frustration, performance of daily activities) which will be transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a less migraine severity and better outcomes. Data will be collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
Modified House Classification ScoresBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on motor function was collected using a Modified House Classification. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with the subject's non-dominant hand which was transformed into a score from 1 to 8 and 0 to 32 where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment ScoresBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on motor function was collected using the Erhardt Developmental Prehension assessment. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with each hand, which was scored as age equivalence of task performance (in months). Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on motor function was collected using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted Test. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete tasks involved in daily activities, mobility, and social/ cognitive activities. The data was transformed into scaled scores ranging from 20 to 80, where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
ABILHAND QuestionnaireBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on motor function was collected using the ABILHAND questionnaire, a measure of manual ability for adults with upper limb impairments. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete daily activities that involve the upper limbs. Score was collected as a patient measure with scores ranging from -10 to 10. Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on cognitive function was collected using selected subtests, from either the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV). For the WISC-V and WAIS-IV subtests selected, scaled scores were derived from the normative data which account for age and demographic information. The selected WISC-V/WAIS-IV subtests were as follows: Digit Span, Symbol Search, Coding and Processing Speed; the first three subtests were scored from 0-10, the fourth subtest from 0-100, and for all subtests higher score is better. The selected subtests, from the WISC-V and the WAIS-IV, were combined to increase statistical power. Statistically rare changes in individual test scores were determined using a reliable change index methodology based upon normative information for these assessments.
Pediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event (e.g. forgetting schoolwork) was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher t-scores indicate worse anger, worse anxiety, worse pain, better social relationships, worse stigma, worse depression, better cognitive function, and worse fatigue. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Picture Vocabulary TestBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on cognitive function was collected using the Picture Vocabulary subtest from the NIH Toolbox. Single words are presented via an audio file, paired simultaneously with 4 screen images of objects, actions, and/or depictions of concepts. The task is to pick the picture that matches the spoken word. Performance on the task was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.
Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on social function was collected using the Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2). Data on a child's ability to engage in emotionally appropriate reciprocal social interactions in naturalistic settings was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater impairment in social function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on behavioral function was collected using the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3). Data on the frequency of a behavior (e.g. avoids eye contact) was collected and transformed into a t-score. Subscales for the BASC-3 scored were: External Problems Composite, the Internal Problems Composite, the Behavioral Symptoms Index, and the Adaptive Skills Composite. For the first three subscales, lower t-score indicates better outcome; for the fourth, a lower t-score indicates worse outcome. T-scores for all the BASC-3 subscales range from 0 to 100, and a t-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10.
Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on anxiety was collected using the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). Data on the truthfulness of a statement (e.g. I am nervous) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 82 where higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on quality of life was collected using the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. had trouble concentrating on a task) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores reflect better quality of life. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Safety of EpidiolexBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Safety of Epidiolex was measured by the number of adverse events and serious adverse events that result from study drug.
NeuroscoreBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on neurological function was collected using the Neuroscore. Data on frequency of seizures, extent of hemiparesis, assessment of visual field cut, and degree of cognitive functioning was transformed into a score from 0 to 15 where higher scores indicate worse neurologic function. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Port-wine Birthmark ScoreBaseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on facial port-wine birthmarks was collected using the Port-wine Birthmark Score. Data on percent of face covered, thickness of birthmark, and darkness of birthmark color was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 43 where higher scores indicate greater severity and greater surface area involved. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Adult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100. Higher t-scores indicate better communication, better ability to participate in social activity, worse anxiety, worse depression, worse emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, worse fatigue, better positive affect, worse sleep disturbance, better lower and upper extremity functions, worse stigma, better satisfaction with social roles, and better cognitive function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)Data on executive function was collected using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. becomes upset too easily) was collected and transformed into a t-score. The following BRIEF-2 subtests were evaluated: Behavioral Regulation Index, Emotional Regulation Index, Cognitive Regulation Index, and Global Executive Composite. For each BRIEF-2 subtest, t-scores range from 0 to 100; a score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. For all BASC-3 subtests, higher scores are worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After consent, subject 10 was not enrolled as they did not meet the inclusion criteria of remaining at a stable does of anti-epileptic drugs 4 weeks prior to enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cannabidiol
Subjects took oral cannabidiol for 6 months (doses ranged from 5 mg/kg/day to 20 mg/kg/day). Neuropsychological, psychiatrics and motor assessments were administered at baseline and six months follow-up.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrew due to moderate side effects (fatigue)1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCannabidiol
Age, Continuous13.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
Brain Involvement
Bilateral Brain Involvement
2 Participants
Brain Involvement
Left-Sided Brain Involvement
2 Participants
Brain Involvement
Right-Sided Brain Involvement
6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Eye Involvement
Bilateral Eye Involvement
1 Participants
Eye Involvement
Left-Sided Eye Involvement
2 Participants
Eye Involvement
No Eye Involvement
3 Participants
Eye Involvement
Right-Sided Eye Involvement
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Skin Involvement
Bilateral Skin Involvement
4 Participants
Skin Involvement
Left-Sided Skin Involvement
2 Participants
Skin Involvement
Right-Sided Skin Involvement
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

List Sorting Working Memory Test

Data on cognitive function was collected using the List Sorting Working Memory Test from the NIH Toolbox. Data was collected on working memory performance, which was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 1 was unable to complete this assessment due to lack of understanding of the instructions. Subject 10 was unable to complete this assessment due to a system error, where the fully adjusted score was not obtained. Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexList Sorting Working Memory TestBaseline List Sorting Working Memory Fully Adjusted Score37.14 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.92
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexList Sorting Working Memory TestFollow-Up List Sorting Working Memory Fully Adjusted Score39.14 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.78
Secondary

ABILHAND Questionnaire

Data on motor function was collected using the ABILHAND questionnaire, a measure of manual ability for adults with upper limb impairments. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete daily activities that involve the upper limbs. Score was collected as a patient measure with scores ranging from -10 to 10. Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 7 misplaced this questionnaire and was not included in analysis. Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexABILHAND QuestionnaireFollow-up Mean of the ABILHAND2.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexABILHAND QuestionnaireBaseline Mean of the ABILHAND1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Secondary

Adult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)

Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100. Higher t-scores indicate better communication, better ability to participate in social activity, worse anxiety, worse depression, worse emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, worse fatigue, better positive affect, worse sleep disturbance, better lower and upper extremity functions, worse stigma, better satisfaction with social roles, and better cognitive function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subjects above the age of 18 completed the pediatric version of this questionnaire and were included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Anxiety46.77 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.33
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Anxiety46.87 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.45
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Depression42.70 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.05
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Depression44.23 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.53
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Fatigue45.23 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.53
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Fatigue42.80 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.6
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Upper Extremity Function48.97 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.37
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Upper Extremity Function53.80 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Lower Extremity Function58.60 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Lower Extremity Function58.60 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Cognitive Function47.03 T-scoreStandard Deviation 15.52
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Cognitive Function46.73 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.01
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol51.10 T-scoreStandard Deviation 14.97
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol41.37 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.98
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Well-being54.30 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.91
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Well-being55.70 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.59
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Sleep Disturbances47.03 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.49
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Sleep Disturbances43.93 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.9
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Participation in Social Activities53.00 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.41
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Participation in Social Activities51.03 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.01
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Satisfaction in Social Activities47.70 T-scoreStandard Deviation 3.28
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Satisfaction in Social Activities49.23 T-scoreStandard Deviation 2.54
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Adult Score for Stigma53.90 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.8
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexAdult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-Up Mean Adult Score for Stigma56.47 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.25
Secondary

Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)

Data on behavioral function was collected using the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3). Data on the frequency of a behavior (e.g. avoids eye contact) was collected and transformed into a t-score. Subscales for the BASC-3 scored were: External Problems Composite, the Internal Problems Composite, the Behavioral Symptoms Index, and the Adaptive Skills Composite. For the first three subscales, lower t-score indicates better outcome; for the fourth, a lower t-score indicates worse outcome. T-scores for all the BASC-3 subscales range from 0 to 100, and a t-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Baseline Mean External Problems Composite51.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.1
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Follow-up Mean External Problems Composite50.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.31
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Baseline Mean Internal Problems Composite52.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.81
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Follow-Up Mean Internal Problems Composite46.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.17
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Baseline Mean Behavioral Symptoms Index54.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.21
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Follow-up Mean Behavioral Symptoms Index50.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.19
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Baseline Mean Adaptive Skills Composite45.00 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.29
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)Follow-Up Mean Adaptive Skills Composite48.44 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.63
Secondary

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)

Data on executive function was collected using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. becomes upset too easily) was collected and transformed into a t-score. The following BRIEF-2 subtests were evaluated: Behavioral Regulation Index, Emotional Regulation Index, Cognitive Regulation Index, and Global Executive Composite. For each BRIEF-2 subtest, t-scores range from 0 to 100; a score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. For all BASC-3 subtests, higher scores are worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Baseline Mean for Behavioral Regulation Index55.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.66
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Follow-Up Mean for Behavioral Regulation Index52.44 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.6
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Baseline Mean for Emotional Regulation Index60.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.24
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Follow-up Mean for Emotional Regulation Index51.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.29
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Baseline Mean for Cognitive Regulation Index54.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.06
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Follow-up Mean for Cognitive Regulation Index54.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.59
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Baseline Mean for Global Executive Composite56.78 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.17
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)Follow-up Mean for Global Executive Composite53.33 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.57
Secondary

Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment Scores

Data on motor function was collected using the Erhardt Developmental Prehension assessment. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with each hand, which was scored as age equivalence of task performance (in months). Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexErhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment ScoresBaseline Mean Dominant Hand Total Score54.22 MonthsStandard Deviation 2.64
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexErhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment ScoresFollow-up Mean Dominant Hand Total Score53.56 MonthsStandard Deviation 4.04
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexErhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment ScoresBaseline Mean Non-Dominant Hand Total Score51.22 MonthsStandard Deviation 9.48
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexErhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment ScoresFollow-up Mean Non-Dominant Hand Total Score53.78 MonthsStandard Deviation 4.15
Secondary

Migraine Severity

Data on migraine severity will be collected using patient responses to questions on a standard six-point scale. Data will be collected on the frequency of an event (e.g. feelings of frustration, performance of daily activities) which will be transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a less migraine severity and better outcomes. Data will be collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 7 misplaced this questionnaire and was not included in analysis. Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexMigraine SeverityBaseline Mean Migraine-Quality of Life Score96.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexMigraine SeverityFollow-up Mean Migraine-Quality of Life Score97.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.69
Secondary

Modified House Classification Scores

Data on motor function was collected using a Modified House Classification. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with the subject's non-dominant hand which was transformed into a score from 1 to 8 and 0 to 32 where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexModified House Classification ScoresBaseline Mean Highest Category in Which All Items were Successfully Completed5.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexModified House Classification ScoresFollow-up Mean Highest Category in Which All Items were Successfully Completed5.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexModified House Classification ScoresBaseline Mean Total Number of Items Successfully Completed26.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexModified House Classification ScoresFollow-up Mean Total Number of Items Successfully Completed27.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75
Secondary

Neuroscore

Data on neurological function was collected using the Neuroscore. Data on frequency of seizures, extent of hemiparesis, assessment of visual field cut, and degree of cognitive functioning was transformed into a score from 0 to 15 where higher scores indicate worse neurologic function. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit and not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreFollow-up Mean Cognitive Function Score1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreBaseline Mean Seizure Score1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreFollow-Up Mean Seizure Score1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreBaseline Mean Hemiparesis Score1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreFollow-Up Mean Hemiparesis Score1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreBaseline Mean Visual Field Cut Score0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreFollow-Up Mean Visual Field Cut Score0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreBaseline Mean Cognitive Function Score2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreBaseline Mean Composite Score5.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexNeuroscoreFollow-up Mean Composite Score3.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Secondary

Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted Test

Data on motor function was collected using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted Test. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete tasks involved in daily activities, mobility, and social/ cognitive activities. The data was transformed into scaled scores ranging from 20 to 80, where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestBaseline Mean Score for Daily Activities58.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.76
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestFollow-up Mean Score for Daily Activities60.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestBaseline Mean Score for Mobility67.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestFollow-Up Mean Score for Mobility68.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestFollow-Up Mean Score for Responsibility53.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestBaseline Mean Score for Social Cognitive66.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.35
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestFollow-up Mean Score for Social Cognitive67.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted TestBaseline Mean Score for Responsibility52.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.67
Secondary

Pediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)

Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event (e.g. forgetting schoolwork) was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher t-scores indicate worse anger, worse anxiety, worse pain, better social relationships, worse stigma, worse depression, better cognitive function, and worse fatigue. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subjects below the age of 18 completed the pediatric version of this questionnaire and were included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Anger53.02 T-scoreStandard Deviation 3.09
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Anger49.67 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Anxiety45.20 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.79
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Anxiety41.07 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.74
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Pain40.20 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.16
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Pain43.50 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.89
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Social Relations43.28 T-scoreStandard Deviation 15.1
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Social Relations54.33 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.96
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Stigma42.45 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.42
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Stigma44.52 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.88
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Depression44.07 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.29
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Depression44.62 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.58
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Cognitive Function49.27 T-scoreStandard Deviation 3.36
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Cognitive Function51.33 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.44
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Baseline Mean Pediatric Score for Fatigue46.38 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.44
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)Follow-up Mean Pediatric Score for Fatigue45.97 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.14
Secondary

Picture Vocabulary Test

Data on cognitive function was collected using the Picture Vocabulary subtest from the NIH Toolbox. Single words are presented via an audio file, paired simultaneously with 4 screen images of objects, actions, and/or depictions of concepts. The task is to pick the picture that matches the spoken word. Performance on the task was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 10 did not complete this assessment due to a technical issue where the fully adjusted score was not calculated. Subject 9 was withdrawn from the study prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPicture Vocabulary TestBaseline Mean of the Fully Adjusted Picture Vocabulary Score42.88 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.86
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPicture Vocabulary TestFollow-up Mean of the Fully Adjusted Picture Vocabulary Score42.38 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.43
Secondary

Port-wine Birthmark Score

Data on facial port-wine birthmarks was collected using the Port-wine Birthmark Score. Data on percent of face covered, thickness of birthmark, and darkness of birthmark color was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 43 where higher scores indicate greater severity and greater surface area involved. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up appointment and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPort-wine Birthmark ScoreFollow-up Mean Total Score8.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexPort-wine Birthmark ScoreBaseline Mean Total Score8.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
Secondary

Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55)

Data on quality of life was collected using the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. had trouble concentrating on a task) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores reflect better quality of life. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 7 misplaced this assessment and was not included in analysis. Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up appointment due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexQuality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55)Baseline Mean Total Score61.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.14
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexQuality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55)Follow-up Mean Total Score71.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
Secondary

Safety of Epidiolex

Safety of Epidiolex was measured by the number of adverse events and serious adverse events that result from study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSafety of EpidiolexNumber of Adverse Events that Resulted from the Study Drug24 Events
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSafety of EpidiolexNumber of Serious Adverse Events that Resulted from the Study Drug0 Events
Secondary

Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)

Data on anxiety was collected using the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). Data on the truthfulness of a statement (e.g. I am nervous) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 82 where higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 7 misplaced this assessment and was not included in analysis. Subject 9 was withdrawn from the study prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexScreen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)Baseline Mean of Total Score14.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.49
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexScreen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)Follow-up Mean of Total Score11.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.16
Secondary

Seizure Frequency

Change in seizure frequency by seizure score at pre-treatment baseline and after six months. The seizure score is taken from the Sturge-Weber Neuroscore on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=1+. but controlled, 2=Breakthrough, 3=monthly, 4=Weekly+. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSeizure FrequencyBaseline Seizure Score from Sturge-Weber Neuroscore1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSeizure FrequencyFollow-up Seizure Score from Sturge-Weber Neuroscore1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)

Data on social function was collected using the Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2). Data on a child's ability to engage in emotionally appropriate reciprocal social interactions in naturalistic settings was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater impairment in social function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSocial Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)Baseline Mean Total Score54.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.71
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexSocial Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)Follow-up Mean Total Score49.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.09
Secondary

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)

Data on cognitive function was collected using selected subtests, from either the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV). For the WISC-V and WAIS-IV subtests selected, scaled scores were derived from the normative data which account for age and demographic information. The selected WISC-V/WAIS-IV subtests were as follows: Digit Span, Symbol Search, Coding and Processing Speed; the first three subtests were scored from 0-10, the fourth subtest from 0-100, and for all subtests higher score is better. The selected subtests, from the WISC-V and the WAIS-IV, were combined to increase statistical power. Statistically rare changes in individual test scores were determined using a reliable change index methodology based upon normative information for these assessments.

Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Population: Subjects 1 and 10 did not complete this questionnaire as they were too young. Subject 9 was withdrawn prior to the 6 month follow-up visit due to a persistent side effect and was not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Baseline Mean Digit Span Score5.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Follow-up Mean Digit Span Score6.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Baseline Mean Symbol Search Score6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Follow-up Mean Symbol Search Score5.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Baseline Mean Coding Score5.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Follow-up Mean Coding Score4.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Baseline Mean Processing Speed Score77.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.93
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)Follow-up Mean Processing Speed Score73.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026