Skip to content

Comparing Different Surgical Techniques for Coverage of Pressure Ulcer

A Retrospective Study Comparing Failure and Complications Rates Between Propeller Flap and Random Flap for Pressure Ulcer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04446936
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-06-25
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2021-01-20
Last updated
2020-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcer

Keywords

Ulcer, Flap, Random, Propeller, Paraplegic, Surgery

Brief summary

The Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery department of Montpellier was born out of the Wound and Healing department, the first unit of this type to be created in Europe. The investigators quickly became the national leader in the management of pressure ulcers, especially in people with spinal cord injuries. Our expertise has evolved over time as well as our surgical techniques for covering ulcers, gradually over time the investigators have gone from random flaps to propeller flaps, more reliable in terms of vascularization and more logical in terms of force distribution and skin tension. The investigators found subjectively that the rate of complications was lower for the helical flaps. The investigators therefore seek to confirm this trend through a retrospective study on patients operated on in the department between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFlap covering for pressure ulcer

Flap covering for pressure ulcer

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major Patient * Patient with trochanteric, ischiatic or sacral pressure ulcer * Patient who undergone flap surgery for pressure ulcer between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2019

Exclusion criteria

* Other loss of substance than pressure ulcer * Combined covering with a random flap and a propeller flap * Surgical revision of a flap without a new flap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure rate1 dayComparing failure rates between the two surgical techniques

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications rate1 dayComparing complications rate between the two surgical techniques

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026