Skip to content

Management of Prostatodynia in Younger Patients With Non-ablative Erbium:YAG Intraurethral Laser

Non Ablative Erbium:YAG Laser Transurethral Treatment for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Younger Patients: a Prospective Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04446598
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-06-25
Start date
2017-03-13
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, Prostatodynia

Brief summary

This prospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between the use of the erbium: YAG (Er:YAG) laser, intraurethrally administered in long non-ablative SMOOTH™ train of pulses applied at the level of the male prostatic urethra, to the use of the pharmacological treatment of oral tadalafil for the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). The results show that both treatments are effective in alleviating symptoms of CP/CPPS. The non-ablative Er:YAG SMOOTHTM laser seems to be a promising treatment for this widely spread condition. More studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Detailed description

Prostatitis is the most common diagnosis (\>50%) in men visiting outpatient urological clinics . The NIH classification classifies prostatitis into 4 types: category I - acute bacterial prostatitis, which is very rare, affecting only up to 5% of patients; category II- chronic bacterial prostatitis, also affecting up to 5% of patients; category III- chronic nonbacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), which is the most common, as it affects 90%-95% of cases; and Category IV- asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis, which has unknown prevalence and also unknown clinical significance. Although category III or CP/CPPS is the most prevalent form of prostatitis, its causes are largely unknown and treatments often fail to alleviate symptoms in the long term. In contrast, patients suffering from type I and II prostatitis are successfully treated with antibiotics, as a uropathogen or an infectious agent is usually identified as the cause . CP/CPPS is characterized by pain in the perineum and tenderness in the prostate and various urological symptoms (urgency, frequency, low urethral pressure) and sometimes also ejaculatory symptoms, such as painful ejaculation. Currently used treatments for CP/CPPS are mainly pharmacological, including alpha blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, phytotherapy, allopurinol, botulinum toxin and traditional Chinese medicine . Non-pharmacological therapies include acupuncture, prostatic massage, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, pulsed magnetic field therapy, transrectal and transurethral thermotherapy and others . Some of the abovementioned therapies alleviate symptoms by improving vascularisation and blood flow of the prostate and peri-prostatic area. This is also the mechanism of action of the erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser with non-ablative SMOOTH™ mode - it works by thermal pulsing of the treated surface, with microsecond-range long pulses combined into long (several hundred millisecond range) sequences. Each laser micropulse sharply increases tissue temperature and acts as a stimulative trigger. Long pulse trains cause slower diffusion of heat to deeper layers of the skin or mucosa, causing initially vasodilation and then collagen remodelling and stimulation of fibroblasts with collagen remodelling. It has shown to improve vascularisation and alleviate symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in women, including irritation, dryness and pain. It has also been used intraurethrally in women to alleviate urinary symptoms of GSM. Intraurethral thermal therapy has been previously shown promising in the treatment of CP/CPPS in men. In this study the investigators aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of transurethral non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy applied at the level of the male prostatic urethra and to compare it with pharmacological treatment of 5 mg oral tadalafil for the treatment of CP/CPPS.

Interventions

DEVICEnon-ablative SMOOTH mode Erbium YAG laser

Erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser with non-ablative SMOOTH™ mode

oral tadalafil 5 mg was administered daily over a period of two months

Sponsors

Adrian Gaspar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome with characteristic symptoms of perineal pain and urinary symptoms of dysuria and urinary frequency; * negative urine culture after prostatic massage; prostatic volume less than 50 cc in prostatic ultrasound; * obstructive uroflowmetric pattern with a Q-max value between 10 and 15 ml/sec

Exclusion criteria

* age over 50 years * current or recent (last 6 months) pharmacological or other therapies of CP/CPPS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum urethral flow value (Q-max)Change from Baseline Q-max at 3 and 6 months following the interventionmeasurement of maximum urethral flow using uroflowmetry
IPSS questionnaireChange from Baseline IPSS score at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the interventionAssessment of urinary symptoms using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain assesment: VAS (visual analog scale) scaleChange from Baseline pain VAS score at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the interventionsubjective assesment of pain using 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) VAS scale. 0 means no pain, 10 means worst possible pain;
dysuria assesment: VAS (visual analog scale) scaleChange from Baseline dysuria VAS score at 1,3, 6 and 12 months following the interventionsubjective assesment of dysuria using 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) VAS scale. 0 means no dysuria, 10 means worst possible dysuria;
Patient satisfaction: 7-point Likert Scale6 months following the interventionsubjective assessment of patients' satisfaction with the treatment using 0 to 6 Likert Scale; Question - How satisfied are you with the treatment? Likert scale: 0 - extremely satisfied; 1- very satisfied; 2 - mostly satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor unsatisfied; 4 - mostly unsatisfied; 5 - very unsatisfied; 6- extremely unsatisfied

Countries

Argentina

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026