Skip to content

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine as an Adjunct to Bupivacaine in Caudal Anesthesia.

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine as an Adjunct to Bupivacaine in Caudal Anesthesia for Pediatric Thoracic Surgeries. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04445636
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-06-24
Start date
2020-06-28
Completion date
2020-12-10
Last updated
2020-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local

Keywords

thoracic surgeries, pediatric caudal, dexmedetomidine

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia, and any side effects of caudal dexmedetomidine versus morphine in combination with bupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.

Detailed description

The patients will be randomized in a blinded fashion to get enrolled into 2 equal groups: Group A patients (n =25) will receive caudal epidural analgesia using dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine, whereas Group B patients (n = 25) will receive caudal epidural analgesia using morphine with bupivacaine. Randomization will be achieved by using an online random number generator. Patient codes will be placed into sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes by a research assistant who is not involved in the study. An anesthesia resident not involved in patient management will be responsible for opening the envelope. The anesthesia resident will prepare the study drug according to the instructions contained within each envelope and give it to the anesthesiologist.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Caudal block with Dexametomedine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine.

DRUGMorphine

Addition of morphine as adjuvant to bupivacaine during caudal block.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization will be achieved by a statistician using an online random number generator. Patient codes will be placed into sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes by a research assistant who is not involved in the study. An anesthesia resident not involved in patient management will be responsible for opening the envelope. The anesthesia resident will prepare the study drug according to the instructions contained within each envelope and give it to the anesthesiologist.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I, II, III. * Patients undergoing lung cyst excision. * Patients undergoing Patent Ductus Arteriosus ligation.

Exclusion criteria

* Preoperative mechanical ventilation. * Preoperative inotropic support * History of mental retardation or delayed development that may interfere with pain intensity assessment * Known or suspected coagulopathy, * Any congenital anomalies of the sacrum or any infection at the site of injection. * Known or suspected allergy to any of the studied drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of postoperative analgesia in hours.3 monthsDuration of postoperative analgesia in hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid consumption in the first 24 hours post- operative.3 monthsOpioid consumption in the first 24 hours post- operative.
The duration of ICU stay in days3 monthsThe duration of ICU stay in days
Pain score FLACC from 0 to 63 monthsPain score FLACC from 0 to 6
Post operative heart rate3 monthsPostoperative heart rate in beat per minute

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026