Knee Osteoarthritis, Lower Extremity Biomechanics, Physiotherapy
Conditions
Keywords
Physiotherapy, External Focus Of Attention, Knee Adduction Moment, Gait Analysis, Osteoarthritis, Motor Learning
Brief summary
Non-surgical treatment options, like exercise therapy, show excellent short-term effects regarding pain reduction and improvement of knee function. However, mid- and long-term effects are missing so far. This might indicate that long-lasting changes in motor-skill performance (Motor Learning) have not occurred. Motor learning is associated with permanent changes in the capability for skilled movement behavior avoiding unfavorable joint loads and inappropriate muscle activation patterns, leading to compensatory movement strategies. One-sided and high repetitive loads in the knee joint could be one reason for the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Physiotherapeutic strategies should therefore be able to stimulate motor learning processes. In physiotherapy, motor learning can be optimized by using instructions and feedback, targeting an external focus of attention, when learning specific movement patterns. This study investigates the effects of a 12 week exercise therapy program, using an external focus of attention, on functional and biomechanical parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis. To measure possible changes, functional measurements are taking place at baseline, after 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The biomechanical measurements (3D gait analysis) are taking place at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks.
Interventions
Instructions and feedback are used to direct the learner's focus to an external source (e.g. the effect the intended movement has) promoting long-term learning by stimulating automatic cognitive control processes.
In contrast, adopting an internal focus of attention (e.g. focus on specific body areal) can disrupt automatic control processes and interfere automatic movement.
Sponsors
Danube University Krems
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Orthopedic Hospital Speising
St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Kellgren-Lawrence-Score 1-3 * BMI \< 33 * Free range of motion in the knee joint
Exclusion criteria
* Activated knee osteoarthritis * Lower extremity surgery in the past 6 weeks * Intake or injection of corticosteroids in the past 3 month * Long-term medication non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs * Neurological diseases * Drug or alcohol abuse
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Adduction Moment (change over a period of 6 month with 3 measurement dates) | Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks | 3D gait analysis during walking |
| Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (change over a period of 6 month with 4 measurement dates) | Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks | Questionnaire; Minimum value: 0 (highest limitation), Maximum: 100 (no limitation) |
| Star Excursion Balance Test (change over a period of 6 month with 4 measurement dates) | Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks | An established test to determine movement control and balance ability. The test person stands on one leg and will is asked to stretch the non supporting leg as far as possible in the directions presented. |
| Isometric strength tests (change over a period of 6 month with 4 measurement dates) | Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks | Measures the isometric force of the knee extensors, knee flexors, hip abductors, hip extensors and hip external rotators with a portable dynamometer |
| Six minute walking test (change over a period of 6 month with 4 measurement dates) | Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks | The six minute walking test is a reliable measuring tool to examine the distance a person can walk in a given time period. |
Countries
Austria
Contacts
Primary ContactBarbara Wondrasch, PhD
Outcome results
None listed