Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Conditions
Keywords
Behavior, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), Insulin Pump, Decision Support System (DSS), Personalized Feedback (PF), Sensor Augmented Pump therapy (SAP), Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), Sensor Augmented Mode (SAM), Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII)
Brief summary
This study is evaluate the superior efficacy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)-based advisory system in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), as compared to Sensor Augmented Mode (SAM) therapy, and with characterizing the impact of psycho-behavioral factors on system performance, which will enable system individualization and lead to automated adaptation of advice delivery to optimize glycemic control and reduce the system's psychological impact.
Detailed description
Four cohorts of about 25 participants each (expected retention 20 per cohort). Each cohort will continue for \ 7 months. Following recruitment, screening, and a run-in period of SAM, participants will be randomized into one of two groups: escalation vs. de-escalation of devices and function. Each treatment modality (SAM - Sensor-Augmented Mode, PF - Personalized Feedback, DSS - Decision Support Systems) will continue for about 8 weeks, with the last 4 weeks used to assess glucose variability (GV) from CGM data.
Interventions
Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user.
CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges
A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 years and older * Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least one year * HbA1c 6.0-11.0%, inclusive * Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study * If on a non-insulin hyperglycemic therapy, stability on that therapy for the prior 3 months and willingness not to alter the therapy for the study duration. * For females, not currently known to be pregnant * If female and sexually active, must agree to use a highly effective form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, subjects who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued. * Subjects must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment and ability to participate in video conferencing. * Investigator has confidence that the subject can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol
Exclusion criteria
* NPH (neutral protamine hagedorn) insulin * Use of any medication that at the discretion of the investigator is deemed to interfere with the trial. * Current treatment of a primary seizure disorder * Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist. * Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder * A known medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk such as the following examples: * Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months * Presence of a known adrenal disorder * Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase \>3 times the upper limit of normal) * Abnormal renal function test results (calculated GFR \<60 mL/min/1.73m2). * Active gastroparesis requiring medical therapy * Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or \>10 mlU/L). * Abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs * Infectious process not anticipated to be resolved prior to study procedures (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, deep tissue infection). * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (Resting diastolic blood pressure \>100 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg). * Uncontrolled microvascular complications such as current active proliferative diabetic retinopathy defined as proliferative retinopathy requiring treatment (e.g. laser therapy or VEGF inhibitor injections) in the past 12 months. * A recent injury to body or limb, muscular disorder, use of any medication, any carcinogenic disease, or other significant medical disorder if that injury, medication or disease in the judgment of the investigator will affect the completion of the protocol. * Not familiar with smart phone technology * Current use of the following drugs and supplements: * Oral steroids * Any other medication that the investigator believes is a contraindication to the subject's participation * Participation in another pharmaceutical or device trial at the time of enrollment or during the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Glycemic Outcomes | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Glucose Variability (GV) as measured by CGM-based Coefficient of Variation (CV), as recommended by the International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Percentage of time blood glucose was below 70mg/dL as per CGM |
| Percent Time in Target Range | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Percentage of time blood glucose was 70mg/dL and 180mg/dL as per CGM |
| Percent Time Above Range | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Percentage of time blood glucose was above 180mg/dL as per CGM |
| Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Percentage of time blood glucose was below 54mg/dL as per CGM |
| Average Glycemia | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | average of CGM values |
| Low Blood Glucose Index | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | The low blood glucose index (LBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values \<1 suggest low risk of hypoglycemia. |
| High Blood Glucose Index | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | The high blood glucose index (HBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values below 10 suggest low to moderate risk. |
| Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention | Percentage of time blood glucose was above 250mg/dL as per CGM |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Study enrollment began September 4, 2020, and all study activities were completed on September 19, 2024. As defined in the protocol, a participant is considered enrolled when the informed consent form has been signed by the participant and the study team. Eighty-eight (88) signed consent, and 26 participants screen failed, withdrew, or dropped prior to screening.
Pre-assignment details
Once eligibility and device training was completed, participants completed a minimum of 14 days (if CGM use within the preceding 3 months) or 4 weeks (if no CGM use within the preceding 3 months) of home use of the DiAs system in Sensor-Augmented Mode (SAM). One participant elected to withdraw from the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Escalation Subjects randomized to this arm will proceed from SAM to PF to DSS
Personalized Feedback: Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user.
Decision Support System: CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges
Sensor Augmented Mode: A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes. | 27 |
| De-escalation Subjects randomized to this arm will proceed from DSS to PF to SAM
Personalized Feedback: Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user.
Decision Support System: CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges
Sensor Augmented Mode: A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes. | 26 |
| Total | 53 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| First intervention (8 weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 |
| First intervention (8 weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
| Second intervention (8 weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Second intervention (8 weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Escalation | Total | De-escalation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 | 37.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 36.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 26 Participants | 51 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Health Insurance Prefer not to answer | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Health Insurance Private insurance through my employer | 19 Participants | 35 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Health Insurance Public state or federal health insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, Veteran's Health Affairs...) | 3 Participants | 9 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Health Insurance Self-insured with private health insurance | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Health Insurance Uninsured | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Highest education level Associate degree | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Highest education level Bachelor degree | 11 Participants | 19 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Highest education level Graduate degree | 5 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Highest education level High school degree or equivalent (e.g., GED) | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Highest education level Some college but no degree | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Last year household income $100,000 - $149,999 | 4 Participants | 12 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Last year household income $150,000 - $199,999 | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Last year household income $20,000 - $44,999 | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Last year household income $45,000 - $99,999 | 15 Participants | 27 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Last year household income Less than $20,000 | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Last year household income More than $200,000 | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Last year household income Prefer not to answer | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Number of participants with each infusion set type MDI | 18 Participants | 32 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Number of participants with each infusion set type Pump | 9 Participants | 21 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 24 Participants | 48 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Female | 16 Participants | 28 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Male | 11 Participants | 24 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Prefer not to say | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 53 | 1 / 53 | 1 / 53 |
Outcome results
Glycemic Outcomes
Glucose Variability (GV) as measured by CGM-based Coefficient of Variation (CV), as recommended by the International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | SAM | 36.3 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | PF | 37.5 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | DSS | 38.6 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| De-escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | SAM | 35.7 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| De-escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | PF | 35.8 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 6 |
| De-escalation | Glycemic Outcomes | DSS | 35.8 Percent of coefficient of variation | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
Average Glycemia
average of CGM values
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Average Glycemia | SAM | 179.1 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 32.3 |
| Escalation | Average Glycemia | PF | 179.8 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 35.5 |
| Escalation | Average Glycemia | DSS | 182.2 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 33 |
| De-escalation | Average Glycemia | SAM | 164.9 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 31.2 |
| De-escalation | Average Glycemia | PF | 167.3 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 30.6 |
| De-escalation | Average Glycemia | DSS | 172.2 mg/dl | Standard Deviation 27.5 |
High Blood Glucose Index
The high blood glucose index (HBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values below 10 suggest low to moderate risk.
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | SAM | 10.6 index | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | PF | 11.0 index | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | DSS | 11.4 index | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| De-escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | SAM | 8.3 index | Standard Deviation 5 |
| De-escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | PF | 8.7 index | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| De-escalation | High Blood Glucose Index | DSS | 9.4 index | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
Low Blood Glucose Index
The low blood glucose index (LBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values \<1 suggest low risk of hypoglycemia.
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | SAM | 0.7 index | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | PF | 0.8 index | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | DSS | 0.8 index | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| De-escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | SAM | 0.9 index | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| De-escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | PF | 0.8 index | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| De-escalation | Low Blood Glucose Index | DSS | 0.7 index | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL
Percentage of time blood glucose was above 250mg/dL as per CGM
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | SAM | 16.6 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | PF | 18.4 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | DSS | 19.4 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | SAM | 11.4 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 11 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | PF | 12.2 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 12 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL | DSS | 13.3 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
Percent Time Above Range
Percentage of time blood glucose was above 180mg/dL as per CGM
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Percent Time Above Range | DSS | 43.9 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Above Range | SAM | 43.6 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Above Range | PF | 43.3 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above Range | PF | 36.1 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above Range | DSS | 39.6 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Above Range | SAM | 36.4 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold
Percentage of time blood glucose was below 70mg/dL as per CGM
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | SAM | 2.5 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | PF | 3.1 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | DSS | 2.8 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | SAM | 3.5 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | PF | 2.8 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold | DSS | 2.9 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia
Percentage of time blood glucose was below 54mg/dL as per CGM
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | SAM | 0.5 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | PF | 0.6 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | DSS | 0.7 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | SAM | 0.7 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | PF | 0.6 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 1 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia | DSS | 0.6 Percent of time | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Percent Time in Target Range
Percentage of time blood glucose was 70mg/dL and 180mg/dL as per CGM
Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | SAM | 53.9 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | PF | 53.6 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | DSS | 53.3 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 16 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | SAM | 60.1 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | PF | 61.1 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| De-escalation | Percent Time in Target Range | DSS | 57.5 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 15.8 |