Skip to content

Adapting Diabetes Treatment Expert Systems to Patient in Type 1 Diabetes

Adapting Diabetes Treatment Expert Systems to Patient's Expectations and Psychobehavioral Characteristics in Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04443153
Acronym
DSS-2
Enrollment
88
Registered
2020-06-23
Start date
2020-09-04
Completion date
2024-09-19
Last updated
2025-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Behavior, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), Insulin Pump, Decision Support System (DSS), Personalized Feedback (PF), Sensor Augmented Pump therapy (SAP), Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), Sensor Augmented Mode (SAM), Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII)

Brief summary

This study is evaluate the superior efficacy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)-based advisory system in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), as compared to Sensor Augmented Mode (SAM) therapy, and with characterizing the impact of psycho-behavioral factors on system performance, which will enable system individualization and lead to automated adaptation of advice delivery to optimize glycemic control and reduce the system's psychological impact.

Detailed description

Four cohorts of about 25 participants each (expected retention 20 per cohort). Each cohort will continue for \ 7 months. Following recruitment, screening, and a run-in period of SAM, participants will be randomized into one of two groups: escalation vs. de-escalation of devices and function. Each treatment modality (SAM - Sensor-Augmented Mode, PF - Personalized Feedback, DSS - Decision Support Systems) will continue for about 8 weeks, with the last 4 weeks used to assess glucose variability (GV) from CGM data.

Interventions

Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user.

CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges

DEVICESensor Augmented Mode

A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years and older * Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least one year * HbA1c 6.0-11.0%, inclusive * Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study * If on a non-insulin hyperglycemic therapy, stability on that therapy for the prior 3 months and willingness not to alter the therapy for the study duration. * For females, not currently known to be pregnant * If female and sexually active, must agree to use a highly effective form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, subjects who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued. * Subjects must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment and ability to participate in video conferencing. * Investigator has confidence that the subject can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol

Exclusion criteria

* NPH (neutral protamine hagedorn) insulin * Use of any medication that at the discretion of the investigator is deemed to interfere with the trial. * Current treatment of a primary seizure disorder * Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist. * Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder * A known medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk such as the following examples: * Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months * Presence of a known adrenal disorder * Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase \>3 times the upper limit of normal) * Abnormal renal function test results (calculated GFR \<60 mL/min/1.73m2). * Active gastroparesis requiring medical therapy * Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or \>10 mlU/L). * Abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs * Infectious process not anticipated to be resolved prior to study procedures (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, deep tissue infection). * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (Resting diastolic blood pressure \>100 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg). * Uncontrolled microvascular complications such as current active proliferative diabetic retinopathy defined as proliferative retinopathy requiring treatment (e.g. laser therapy or VEGF inhibitor injections) in the past 12 months. * A recent injury to body or limb, muscular disorder, use of any medication, any carcinogenic disease, or other significant medical disorder if that injury, medication or disease in the judgment of the investigator will affect the completion of the protocol. * Not familiar with smart phone technology * Current use of the following drugs and supplements: * Oral steroids * Any other medication that the investigator believes is a contraindication to the subject's participation * Participation in another pharmaceutical or device trial at the time of enrollment or during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycemic OutcomesAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionGlucose Variability (GV) as measured by CGM-based Coefficient of Variation (CV), as recommended by the International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Time Below Recommended ThresholdAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionPercentage of time blood glucose was below 70mg/dL as per CGM
Percent Time in Target RangeAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionPercentage of time blood glucose was 70mg/dL and 180mg/dL as per CGM
Percent Time Above RangeAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionPercentage of time blood glucose was above 180mg/dL as per CGM
Percent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionPercentage of time blood glucose was below 54mg/dL as per CGM
Average GlycemiaAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionaverage of CGM values
Low Blood Glucose IndexAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionThe low blood glucose index (LBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values \<1 suggest low risk of hypoglycemia.
High Blood Glucose IndexAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionThe high blood glucose index (HBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values below 10 suggest low to moderate risk.
Percent Time Above 250 mg/dLAssessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each interventionPercentage of time blood glucose was above 250mg/dL as per CGM

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study enrollment began September 4, 2020, and all study activities were completed on September 19, 2024. As defined in the protocol, a participant is considered enrolled when the informed consent form has been signed by the participant and the study team. Eighty-eight (88) signed consent, and 26 participants screen failed, withdrew, or dropped prior to screening.

Pre-assignment details

Once eligibility and device training was completed, participants completed a minimum of 14 days (if CGM use within the preceding 3 months) or 4 weeks (if no CGM use within the preceding 3 months) of home use of the DiAs system in Sensor-Augmented Mode (SAM). One participant elected to withdraw from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Escalation
Subjects randomized to this arm will proceed from SAM to PF to DSS Personalized Feedback: Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user. Decision Support System: CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges Sensor Augmented Mode: A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes.
27
De-escalation
Subjects randomized to this arm will proceed from DSS to PF to SAM Personalized Feedback: Provides tailored information to the user about what glycemic risk they may be facing as well as how glycemic control and system use looked in the past week. Treatment decision and therapy changes are entirely left to the decision of the user. Decision Support System: CGM-based system that includes Personalized Feedback (PF) and further assists with treatment recommendations for common metabolic challenges Sensor Augmented Mode: A mode in Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) that combines Diabetes Assistant, Insulin pump or Multiple Daily Injections, CGM, ketone meters, and glycemic treatment guidelines together to manage diabetes.
26
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First intervention (8 weeks)Lost to Follow-up02
First intervention (8 weeks)Withdrawal by Subject20
Second intervention (8 weeks)Lost to Follow-up20
Second intervention (8 weeks)Withdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEscalationTotalDe-escalation
Age, Continuous37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants51 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Health Insurance
Prefer not to answer
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Health Insurance
Private insurance through my employer
19 Participants35 Participants16 Participants
Health Insurance
Public state or federal health insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, Veteran's Health Affairs...)
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Health Insurance
Self-insured with private health insurance
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Health Insurance
Uninsured
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Highest education level
Associate degree
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Highest education level
Bachelor degree
11 Participants19 Participants8 Participants
Highest education level
Graduate degree
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Highest education level
High school degree or equivalent (e.g., GED)
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Highest education level
Some college but no degree
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Last year household income
$100,000 - $149,999
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Last year household income
$150,000 - $199,999
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Last year household income
$20,000 - $44,999
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Last year household income
$45,000 - $99,999
15 Participants27 Participants12 Participants
Last year household income
Less than $20,000
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Last year household income
More than $200,000
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Last year household income
Prefer not to answer
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Number of participants with each infusion set type
MDI
18 Participants32 Participants14 Participants
Number of participants with each infusion set type
Pump
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants48 Participants24 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Female
16 Participants28 Participants12 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Male
11 Participants24 Participants13 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Prefer not to say
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 530 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 530 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 531 / 531 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Glycemic Outcomes

Glucose Variability (GV) as measured by CGM-based Coefficient of Variation (CV), as recommended by the International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationGlycemic OutcomesSAM36.3 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 4
EscalationGlycemic OutcomesPF37.5 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 5.3
EscalationGlycemic OutcomesDSS38.6 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 5.1
De-escalationGlycemic OutcomesSAM35.7 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 6.7
De-escalationGlycemic OutcomesPF35.8 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 6
De-escalationGlycemic OutcomesDSS35.8 Percent of coefficient of variationStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Average Glycemia

average of CGM values

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationAverage GlycemiaSAM179.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 32.3
EscalationAverage GlycemiaPF179.8 mg/dlStandard Deviation 35.5
EscalationAverage GlycemiaDSS182.2 mg/dlStandard Deviation 33
De-escalationAverage GlycemiaSAM164.9 mg/dlStandard Deviation 31.2
De-escalationAverage GlycemiaPF167.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 30.6
De-escalationAverage GlycemiaDSS172.2 mg/dlStandard Deviation 27.5
Secondary

High Blood Glucose Index

The high blood glucose index (HBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values below 10 suggest low to moderate risk.

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexSAM10.6 indexStandard Deviation 5.7
EscalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexPF11.0 indexStandard Deviation 6.2
EscalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexDSS11.4 indexStandard Deviation 6.2
De-escalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexSAM8.3 indexStandard Deviation 5
De-escalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexPF8.7 indexStandard Deviation 5.3
De-escalationHigh Blood Glucose IndexDSS9.4 indexStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

Low Blood Glucose Index

The low blood glucose index (LBGI) is based on a nonlinear transformation of blood glucose values that corrects for the asymmetry of the glucose scale. This transformation maps glucose values into a risk space (minimum risk = 0), where higher values correspond to higher risk. Values \<1 suggest low risk of hypoglycemia.

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationLow Blood Glucose IndexSAM0.7 indexStandard Deviation 0.5
EscalationLow Blood Glucose IndexPF0.8 indexStandard Deviation 0.6
EscalationLow Blood Glucose IndexDSS0.8 indexStandard Deviation 0.5
De-escalationLow Blood Glucose IndexSAM0.9 indexStandard Deviation 0.7
De-escalationLow Blood Glucose IndexPF0.8 indexStandard Deviation 0.7
De-escalationLow Blood Glucose IndexDSS0.7 indexStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Percent Time Above 250 mg/dL

Percentage of time blood glucose was above 250mg/dL as per CGM

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLSAM16.6 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 12.6
EscalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLPF18.4 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 14.5
EscalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLDSS19.4 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 14.8
De-escalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLSAM11.4 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 11
De-escalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLPF12.2 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 12
De-escalationPercent Time Above 250 mg/dLDSS13.3 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 11.5
Secondary

Percent Time Above Range

Percentage of time blood glucose was above 180mg/dL as per CGM

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationPercent Time Above RangeDSS43.9 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 16.7
EscalationPercent Time Above RangeSAM43.6 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 18.2
EscalationPercent Time Above RangePF43.3 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 19.7
De-escalationPercent Time Above RangePF36.1 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 17.4
De-escalationPercent Time Above RangeDSS39.6 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 16.6
De-escalationPercent Time Above RangeSAM36.4 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 18.8
Secondary

Percent Time Below Recommended Threshold

Percentage of time blood glucose was below 70mg/dL as per CGM

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdSAM2.5 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.4
EscalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdPF3.1 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.6
EscalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdDSS2.8 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.3
De-escalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdSAM3.5 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.3
De-escalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdPF2.8 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.9
De-escalationPercent Time Below Recommended ThresholdDSS2.9 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Percent Time in Clinical Hypoglycemia

Percentage of time blood glucose was below 54mg/dL as per CGM

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaSAM0.5 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 0.8
EscalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaPF0.6 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 0.6
EscalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaDSS0.7 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 0.9
De-escalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaSAM0.7 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 0.7
De-escalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaPF0.6 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 1
De-escalationPercent Time in Clinical HypoglycemiaDSS0.6 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Percent Time in Target Range

Percentage of time blood glucose was 70mg/dL and 180mg/dL as per CGM

Time frame: Assessed over the last 4 weeks (Weeks 4 - 8), for each intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscalationPercent Time in Target RangeSAM53.9 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 16.9
EscalationPercent Time in Target RangePF53.6 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 18.3
EscalationPercent Time in Target RangeDSS53.3 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 16
De-escalationPercent Time in Target RangeSAM60.1 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 16.9
De-escalationPercent Time in Target RangePF61.1 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 16.1
De-escalationPercent Time in Target RangeDSS57.5 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 15.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026