Artificial Intelligence, Colonic Adenoma, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyp, Colonoscopy
Conditions
Brief summary
This controlled-randomized trial compares the artificial intelligence Genius® system assisted (Genius+) to standard (Genius-) colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Genius® system on ADR in routine colonoscopy. The secondary aims will be the impact of Genius® system on polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR), advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR), mean number of polyps (MNP), polyp type and localization, and operator type (according to basal ADR).
Detailed description
Any patient seen by gastroenterologists working in the endoscopy unit and meeting the inclusion criteria may be recruited. The patient will be offered to participate in the study. The information form as well as the consent, will be given to the patient for a good understanding of the study and the investigator in charge of the patient gives all the additional explanations necessary for this good understanding (but of the study, the course, risks and benefits). A period of reflection will be left to the patient or his family to make a free decision whether or not to participate in the study. After the consent to participate will be signed by the gastroenterologist and the patient, the patient will be randomized. The use of the Genius® system will depend on the randomization that will be performed at the start of the colonoscopy. This randomization will be done in the computer examination room using the randomization software. The patient will therefore be randomized into 2 groups: Arm 1- Standard colonoscopy Arm 2- Colonoscopy assisted by Genius® system A comparison of the two groups standard colonoscopy vs colonoscopy assisted by Genius® system will be made as following: A-Main criterion: \- Adenoma detection rate (ADR) B-Secondary criteria: Polyps detection rate (PDR) Proximal serrated polyps detection rate (PSPDR) Neoplasia detection rate (NDR) Mean number of polyps (MNP) Mean number of adenomas (MNA) Factors associated with ADR
Interventions
OTHERGenius® System-assisted Colonoscopy
Genius® Intelligence System is used to assist Colonoscopy
OTHERStandard Colonoscopy
Standard Colonoscopy without Genius® Intelligence System is performed
Sponsors
Clinique Paris-Bercy
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Arm 1- Standard colonoscopy Arm 2- Colonoscopy assisted by Genius® system
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient scheduled for total colonoscopic exploration, during the period study * Patient over or equal to 18 years * ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 * No participation in another clinical study * Certificate of non opposition signed
Exclusion criteria
* Patient under 18 years old * ASA 4, ASA 5 * Pregnant woman * Patient with coagulation abnormalities preventing polypectomy: prothrombin level \<50%, Platelets \<50000 / mm3, effective anti-coagulation in progress, clopidogrel in progress. * Patient referred for resection of a known polyp * Inflammatory bowel disease * Known colonic stenosis * Diverticulitis less than 6 weeks old * Patient unable to give consent or protected by law * Opposition expressed for inclusion in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) | 1 day | percentage of colonoscopy with one or more adenoma of the colon |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Morbidity: bleeding rate (%) | 7 days after procedure | Bleeding rates (%) |
| Advanced Neoplasia Detection Rate (ANDR) | 1 day | percentage of colonoscopy with one or more advanced neoplasia of the colon |
| Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate (PSPDR) | 1 day | percentage of colonoscopy with one or more serrated polyp of the colon |
| Morbidity: perforation rate (%) | 7 days after procedure | Perforation rates (%) |
| The factors influencing the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) | 1 day | Withdrawal time (in seconds): time of exploration from the caecum to the anal verge |
| Time to reach caecum (sec) | 1 day | Time to reach caecum from the beginning of the procedure (in seconds) |
| Caecal intubation rate (%) | 1 day | Caecal intubation rate (complete colonoscopy) |
| Polyp Detection Rate (PDR) | 1 day | percentage of colonoscopy with one or more polyp of the colon |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed