Skip to content

Thermic Effect of Three Different Meals in Healthy Women

Dietary Induced Thermogenic Differences After Consumption of an Unrefined Meal, a Gluten-free Meal, and a Highly Processed Meal

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04440826
Enrollment
11
Registered
2020-06-22
Start date
2015-02-23
Completion date
2015-05-30
Last updated
2024-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Weight Loss

Brief summary

This study will investigate the acute effect of three isocaloric meals varying in level of food processing, including a whole foods, gluten-free, and highly processed meal on energy metabolism and blood glucose in 8-12 young adult, normal weight females. A secondary aim of this proposed study is to compare palatability, satiety, and perceived energy ratings among highly processed, unrefined, and gluten-free unrefined isocaloric meals.

Detailed description

A shift towards a diet containing large quantities of highly processed foods is believed to be a major contributor to the trends in obesity. The degree of processing of foods often affects the nutritional content of the constituents. A reduction in macromolecular complexity allows for an increased rate of digestion, meaning that the body does not have to work as hard to metabolize high processed food products. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect on energy metabolism and blood glucose after the consumption of an unrefined, whole foods meal versus two highly processed food meals, including a common Western style meal and gluten-free meal in 8-12 young adult, normal weight females. A secondary aim of this proposed study is to compare palatability, satiety, and perceived energy ratings among highly processed, unrefined, and gluten-free unrefined isocaloric meals. It is hypothesized that an unrefined meal will induce a greater postprandial thermogenic response and a smaller blood glucose response than a highly processed or gluten-free meal. Additionally, it is hypothesized that a highly processed foods meal will be considered more palatable than an unrefined or gluten-free meal.

Interventions

Whole foods meal

OTHERProcessed Food Meal

Processed food meal

OTHERGluten-free and lactose-free

Gluten-free and lactose-free food meal

Sponsors

Skidmore College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy females between the ages of 18 and 24 years that have BMIs that fall in the range of 18.5 kg/m2 to 28 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

* Those with a history of celiac disease or other food allergies, metabolic disease or heart disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thermic Effect of Meals (TEM) also known as Postprandial ThermogenesisTEM; 45-60; 105-120; and 165-180 minutes after meal ingestionThe total amount of calories burned after each meal will be measured using indirect calorimetry with the ventilated hood technique. Specifically, the thermic effect of each meal will be measured for a total of three hours at 45 minute intervals for 15 minutes at a time (45-60; 105-120; and 165-180 minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood PressureBaseline 0 minutes, 60, 120, and 180 minutes postprandialMeasure blood pressure following the resting metabolic rate test
Blood Glucose ResponseBaseline line 0 minutes, and 60, 120, 180 minutes postprandialChange in postprandial blood glucose compared baseline
Change in Hunger and Palatability Scores and Energy LevelBaseline 0 minutes, and 60, 120, 180 minutes postprandialAssess change in subjective hunger, fullness, satiation, palatability and energy ratings using a visual analog scale ranging from 0-100 mm
Heart RateBaseline 0 minutes, 60, 120, and 180 minutes postprandialMeasure heart rate following the resting metabolic rate test

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026