Infertility, Female
Conditions
Keywords
virtual reality, hysteroscopy, infertility
Brief summary
This study is a comparison between the current standard practice of performing a diagnostic hysteroscopy and a relatively recently developed technology that is added to the standard diagnostic hysteroscopy. The aim of the study is to find out whether this newer technology has an advantage for the patient, in the form of anxiety and pain reduction.
Interventions
Virtual Reality headset, consisting of headphones with smartphone glasses - see oncomfort.com/en, CE approval conform 93/42/EEC and 2007/47/EEC
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This study is a comparison between the current standard practice of performing a diagnostic hysteroscopy and a relatively recently developed technology that is added to the standard diagnostic hysteroscopy. The aim of the study is to find out whether this newer technology has an advantage for the patient, in the form of anxiety and pain reduction.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* undergoing fertility treatments * for which outpatient hysteroscopy has been prescribed * for different possible indications: suspicion of intracavitary pathology, recurrent implantation failure, recurrent early pregnancy loss, …
Exclusion criteria
1. Hearing impairments and blindness 2. Motion sickness 3. Any known anatomical characteristics that may make performing the office procedure impossible. 4. The unwillingness of the patient to undergo an office hysteroscopy 5. Denial or withdrawal of informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in pain experience as assessed using visual analog scale | 1/ baseline pre-procedure 2/ immediately after the procedure (1+2= day of office hysteroscopy) and 3/ 1 week after the procedure | quantified through visual analog scale: from 0.0 to 10.0cm, ranging from 0.0 meaning 'No pain' and 10.0 representing 'worst imaginable pain'. |
Countries
Belgium