Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Cancer, Informal caregivers, Information, Intervention, Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
Brief summary
The HERMES intervention was developed in a Danish setting after a comprehensive investigation on caregivers' needs. The intervention consists of: 1) a systematic identification of the caregiver's unmet information needs and 2) a subsequent consultation with a nurse providing the lacking information. The evaluation carried out in a randomized trial at Herlev Hospital showed positive results. It reduced the unmet information needs and improved the caregivers' evaluation of the information from and communication with the health care professionals and the perception of being seen and acknowledged as a caregiver. However, although research projects may show a positive effect, this does not mean that the intervention will be easily implemented in the health care system. Nor does it guarantee that the intervention will show the expected results once implemented in a busy clinical routine. Therefore, the present project will adapt the HERMES intervention to be implemented in Danish departments of oncology and haematology by (in the first part of the project): 1. Elucidating how the HERMES intervention is best implemented in the clinical setting according to the clinical staff. 2. Elucidating how the HERMES intervention is best implemented in the treatment and follow-up period according to the patients and their caregivers. 3. Developing a technological solution (an app) for the HERMES intervention in which the responses given by the caregivers will form the basis for a subsequent consultation with the health care staff. 4. Revising the HERMES intervention based on the outcomes of a-c. 5. Testing the revised HERMES intervention in a pilot study. In the second part of the project, the revised HERMES intervention will be tested in a large scale trial with the purpose to: 1. Implement the revised HERMES intervention in the departments of oncology/haematology. 2. Test the effect of the revised HERMES intervention. 3. Evaluate the feasibility of the revised HERMES intervention in a large scale. 4. Elucidate the effectiveness and the feasibility of the intervention and assess possibilities and potential needs for further adaptation in order to secure the future applicability in the Danish Health Care System. Thus, the overall aim is that by the end of the study, an evidence based and practical implementable method to (continous) use of the HERMES intervention in the Danish health care system is available.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALHERMES
Via an app, the caregiver answers 14 questions about his/her need for (more) information. The caregiver presents his/her answers (i.e., need for information) to the health care professionals (HCPs), and the HCPs provide the caregiver with the lacking information.
Sponsors
Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark
Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
South Jutland Hospital, Denmark
Bispebjerg Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. All clusters (i.e., participating oncological departments) will start as controls and will change to intervention at various times determined by randomization. In this way, all departments will contribute to control and intervention groups, thus accounting for variation between departments.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult (18+ years) * Primary caregiver (defined as the lay person (partner, family member, friend, etc) most involved in the patient's disease course. The primary caregiver is appointed by the patient) * Caregiver of an adult cancer patient starting up a treatment course in an oncological department * Written informed consent to participation
Exclusion criteria
* Caregivers not able to read and understand Danish * Caregivers with no or minimal contact to the oncological department
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of information from and communication with health care professionals | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by the subscale 'Problems with the quality of information from and communication with health care professionals' in the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN). Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. more problems with the quality of information from and communication with health care professionals. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of information from health care professionals | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by (a revised version of) the subscale 'Lack of information from health care professionals' in the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN). Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. more lack of information from health care professionals |
| Attention from health care professionals | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by the subscale 'Lack of attention from health care professionals on the caregivers' wellbeing' in the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN). Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. more lack of attention from health care professionals |
| Quality of information from and communication with health care professionals | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 6 months follow-up | Measured by the subscale 'Problems with the quality of information from and communication with health care professionals' in the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN). Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. more problems with the quality of information from and communication with health care professionals. |
| Emotional functioning | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Emotional Functioning 10 scale (EORTC EF10). Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. worse emotional functioning |
| Positive emotional functioning | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by a scale of five positively formulated items concerning emotional functioning which were excluded from the EORTC Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) emotional functioning bank during the development of the item bank. Subscale score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. more positive emotional functioning |
| Caregiver involvement | Change from baseline (enrollment) to 3 months follow-up | Measured by item 12 in the Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire (CaTCoN). Item score range: 0-100. A higher score represents a worse outcome, i.e. more caregiver dissatisfaction with involvement |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
Primary ContactMathilde Adsersen, PhD
Outcome results
None listed