Alzheimer Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Alzheimer's, Dementia, Cognitive Impairment, Amyloid Plaque
Brief summary
The reason for this study is to see how safe and effective the study drug donanemab is in participants with early Alzheimer's disease. Additional participants will be enrolled to an addendum safety cohort. The participants will be administered open-label donanemab. Trial participants who were dosed with donanemab in the main study will be enrolled to a 3-year follow up addendum. No study drug will be administered during this follow up.
Detailed description
TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 is a Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of N3pG antibody (donanemab) in participants with early symptomatic AD (prodromal AD and mild dementia due to AD) with the presence of brain amyloid and tau pathology. Following the double-blind 76-week main study period, a double-blind 78-week long-term extension period is added to further evaluate donanemab efficacy and safety over time. Participants from the addendum safety cohort are not eligible for the extension period. Participants previously dosed with donanemab in the main study will be monitored to track re-accumulation of amyloid plaque for 3 years.
Interventions
Given IV
Given IV
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Gradual and progressive change in memory function reported by participants or informants for ≥ 6 months * MMSE score of 20 to 28 (inclusive) at baseline * Meet 18F flortaucipir PET scan (central read) criteria - does not apply to safety cohort * Meet 18F florbetapir PET scan (central read) criteria * Have a study partner who will provide written informed consent to participate
Exclusion criteria
* Contraindication to MRI or PET scans * Current treatment with immunoglobulin G (IgG) therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Overall Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale is used to assess whether donanemab slows down the clinical decline associated with AD compared with placebo. iADRS is an integrated assessment of cognition and daily function comprised of items from the ADAS-Cog13 and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). The scale ranges from 0 to 144, where lower scores indicate worse performance and higher score indicates better performance. Least Squares (LS) Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AchI)/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale is used to assess whether donanemab slows down the clinical decline associated with AD compared with placebo. iADRS is an integrated assessment of cognition and daily function comprised of items from the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). The scale ranges from 0 to 144, where lower scores indicate worse performance and higher score indicates better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | The ADAS is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-cog consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, age at baseline, baseline tau category, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Overall Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Overall Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Plaque Deposition as Measured by Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan | Baseline, Week 76 | Amyloid PET scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in amyloid plaques. Quantitative amyloid burden was first formalized as the average Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) in six predetermined cortical brain regions relative to the cerebellum as a reference region. Larger SUVR reflects the larger cortical amyloid burden relative to cerebellum. SUVR values were further calibrated to a centiloid (CL) scale. The Centiloid scale anchor points are 0 and 100, where 0 represents a high-certainty amyloid negative scan and 100 represents the amount of global amyloid deposition found in a typical AD scan. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, baseline tau category, and age at baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 PET Scan | Baseline, Week 76 | Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Tau PET scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in aggregated tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) in frontal lobe relative to the cerebellum gray as a reference region. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden in the frontal lobe relative to cerebellum gray. LS Mean value was adjusted for baseline score, screening tau category, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares). |
| Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Baseline, Week 76 | MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain volume. Volumetric MRI parameters were measured in bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole brain, and bilateral ventricles. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline tau category, and age at baseline. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Average Serum Concentration at Steady State of Donanemab | Week 16 to week 20 | The average serum concentration at steady state, calculated as Cav = AUCtau/tau, where tau is the dosing interval (4 weeks). AUCtau/tau was assessed at week 12, 16, 24, 36, 52, 64 and Cav for the dosing interval from week 16 to week 20 is reported. |
| Number or Participants With Anti-Donanemab Antibodies | Baseline through Week 76 | Number of participants with treatment-emergent positive Anti-Donanemab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. |
| Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
| Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | Baseline, Week 76 | MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use. |
Countries
Australia, Canada, Czechia, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Donanemab Participants received 700 mg Donanemab Q4W x 3 doses, then 1400 mg Q4W given IV for up to 72 weeks. | 860 |
| Placebo Participants received placebo given IV. | 876 |
| Total | 1,736 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 50 | 21 |
| Overall Study | Continuing Study | 7 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Death | 15 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 11 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 19 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Progressive Disease | 4 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 111 | 94 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal due to Caregiver Circumstances | 21 | 20 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo | Donanemab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 73.01 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18 | 73.04 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 | 72.98 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 71 Participants | 36 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 1177 Participants | 594 Participants | 583 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 488 Participants | 246 Participants | 242 Participants |
| Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) | 103.83 Score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.16 | 103.56 Score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.02 | 104.10 Score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 104 Participants | 47 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 40 Participants | 21 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 1588 Participants | 807 Participants | 781 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 17 Participants | 4 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 137 Participants | 73 Participants | 64 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 22 Participants | 10 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 88 Participants | 43 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 22 Participants | 9 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 159 Participants | 82 Participants | 77 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 39 Participants | 23 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 1252 Participants | 632 Participants | 620 Participants |
| Screening Tau Category High | 552 Participants | 281 Participants | 271 Participants |
| Screening Tau Category Intermediate (Low-medium) | 1182 Participants | 594 Participants | 588 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 996 Participants | 503 Participants | 493 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 740 Participants | 373 Participants | 367 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 989 participants | 501 participants | 488 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 738 participants | 373 participants | 365 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 16 / 853 | 10 / 874 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 567 / 853 | 425 / 874 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 148 / 853 | 138 / 874 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale is used to assess whether donanemab slows down the clinical decline associated with AD compared with placebo. iADRS is an integrated assessment of cognition and daily function comprised of items from the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). The scale ranges from 0 to 144, where lower scores indicate worse performance and higher score indicates better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with baseline Intermediate Tau level and with baseline and at least one postbaseline iADRS data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -6.02 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -9.27 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.49 |
Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Overall Population)
Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale is used to assess whether donanemab slows down the clinical decline associated with AD compared with placebo. iADRS is an integrated assessment of cognition and daily function comprised of items from the ADAS-Cog13 and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). The scale ranges from 0 to 144, where lower scores indicate worse performance and higher score indicates better performance. Least Squares (LS) Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AchI)/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline iADRS data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Overall Population) | -10.19 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.53 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) (Overall Population) | -13.11 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Plaque Deposition as Measured by Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan
Amyloid PET scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in amyloid plaques. Quantitative amyloid burden was first formalized as the average Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) in six predetermined cortical brain regions relative to the cerebellum as a reference region. Larger SUVR reflects the larger cortical amyloid burden relative to cerebellum. SUVR values were further calibrated to a centiloid (CL) scale. The Centiloid scale anchor points are 0 and 100, where 0 represents a high-certainty amyloid negative scan and 100 represents the amount of global amyloid deposition found in a typical AD scan. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, baseline tau category, and age at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline amyloid PET scan data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Plaque Deposition as Measured by Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan | -87.03 centiloids | Standard Error 0.95 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Plaque Deposition as Measured by Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan | -0.67 centiloids | Standard Error 0.909 |
Change From Baseline in Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 PET Scan
Flortaucipir PET imaging was used as a quantitative tau biomarker. Tau PET scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in aggregated tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Quantitative tau burden was formalized using Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) in frontal lobe relative to the cerebellum gray as a reference region. Larger SUVR reflects larger tau burden in the frontal lobe relative to cerebellum gray. LS Mean value was adjusted for baseline score, screening tau category, age and treatment (Type III sum of squares).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and post-baseline tau PET scan.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline in Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 PET Scan | 0.0401 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) | Standard Error 0.00398 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brain Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F18 PET Scan | 0.0442 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) | Standard Error 0.00374 |
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)
MRI scans at baseline and at 76 weeks after the first treatment were used to quantitatively estimate change in brain volume. Volumetric MRI parameters were measured in bilateral hippocampus, bilateral whole brain, and bilateral ventricles. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline tau category, and age at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline vMRI data point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Hippocampus | -0.20 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.005 |
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Whole Brain | -27.46 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.409 |
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Ventricles | 10.07 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.185 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Hippocampus | -0.22 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.005 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Whole Brain | -20.79 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.392 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI) | Bilateral Ventricles | 7.05 cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Standard Error 0.178 |
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
The ADAS is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-cog consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with baseline Intermediate Tau level and with baseline and at least one postbaseline ADAS-Cog13 data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | 4.69 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population)
The ADAS-Cog13 is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS-Cog13 consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline ADAS-Cog13 data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population) | 5.46 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) (Overall Population) | 6.79 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline Intermediate Tau level and with baseline and at least one postbaseline ADCS-iADL data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -2.76 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -4.59 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Overall Population)
The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures both basic and instrumental activities (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23) of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline ADCS-iADL data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Overall Population) | -4.42 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Score (Overall Population) | -6.13 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with baseline Intermediate Tau level and with baseline and at least one postbaseline CDR-SB data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | 1.20 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.105 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | 1.88 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.102 |
Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population)
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and covariates for baseline score, baseline score-by-visit interaction, age at baseline, baseline tau category, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline CDR-SB data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population) | 1.72 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.096 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (Overall Population) | 2.42 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.092 |
Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population)
MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with baseline Intermediate Tau level and with baseline and at least one postbaseline MMSE data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -1.61 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Intermediate (Low-medium) Tau Population) | -2.09 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Overall Population)
MMSE is an instrument used to assess cognitive function (orientation, memory, attention, ability to name objects, follow verbal/written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures). Total score ranges from 0 to 30; lower score indicates greater disease severity. LS Mean value was adjusted for basis expansion terms (two terms), basis expansion term-by-treatment interaction, and covariates for age at baseline, pooled investigator, baseline tau level, and baseline AchI/Memantine use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 76
Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and at least one postbaseline MMSE data point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Overall Population) | -2.47 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Overall Population) | -2.94 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
Number or Participants With Anti-Donanemab Antibodies
Number of participants with treatment-emergent positive Anti-Donanemab antibodies was summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 76
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable anti-drug antibody measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Number or Participants With Anti-Donanemab Antibodies | 693 Participants |
| Placebo | Number or Participants With Anti-Donanemab Antibodies | 48 Participants |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Average Serum Concentration at Steady State of Donanemab
The average serum concentration at steady state, calculated as Cav = AUCtau/tau, where tau is the dosing interval (4 weeks). AUCtau/tau was assessed at week 12, 16, 24, 36, 52, 64 and Cav for the dosing interval from week 16 to week 20 is reported.
Time frame: Week 16 to week 20
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable PK data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donanemab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Average Serum Concentration at Steady State of Donanemab | 63 micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32 |